Advertisement

GeoJournal

pp 1–12 | Cite as

Income heterogeneity and the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Sub-Saharan African countries

  • Muhammad Maladoh BahEmail author
  • Muhammad Mansur Abdulwakil
  • Muhammad Azam
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to empirically test the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis for ten middle income Sub-Saharan African countries over the period of 1971–2012. We observed that prior panel studies group together African countries that are heterogeneous in income levels. This study categorizes selected middle-income countries into two categories to better validate the EKC hypothesis. The study utilizes panel unit root, panel cointegration and panel dynamic ordinary least squares technique for empirical analysis. Panel cointegration results confirm the existence of a long-run relationship between environmental degradation proxied by Greenhouse gas emissions and key indicators for both middle income groups. Additionally, the long-run estimates confirm the existence of EKC hypothesis for both middle-income groups. Empirical findings suggest that it is possible for Sub-Saharan African countries to continue their efforts to spur economic growth while minimizing environmental damage at the same time.

Keywords

EKC Sub-Saharan Africa Panel data 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human and/or animal participation

This study did not involve human and/or animal participants.

References

  1. AghaKouchak, A. (2015). A multivariate approach for persistence-based drought prediction: Application to the 2010–2011 East Africa drought. Journal of Hydrology, 526, 127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akca, H., Ozturk, I., & Karaca, C. (2012). Economic development and environment pollution in high and middle income countries: A comparative analysis of Environmental Kuznets Curve. Actual Problems of Economics, 137, 238–249.Google Scholar
  3. Alam, M. M., Murad, M. W., Noman, A. H. M., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 70, 466–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albiman, M. M., Suleiman, N. N., & Baka, H. O. (2015). The relationship between energy consumption, CO2 emissions and economic growth in Tanzania. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 9(3), 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alege, P. O., & Ogundipe, A. A. (2013). Environmental quality and economic growth in Nigeria: A fractional cointegration analysis. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 2(2), 580–596.Google Scholar
  6. Ali, H. S., Law, S. H., & Zannah, T. I. (2016). Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(12), 12435–12443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Al-Mulali, U., Solarin, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Investigating the presence of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Natural Hazards, 80(3), 1729–1747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Al-Mulali, U., Tang, C. F., & Ozturk, I. (2015). Estimating the environment Kuznets Curve hypothesis: Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 918–924.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alshehry, A. S. (2015). Economic growth and environmental degradation in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 33–44.Google Scholar
  10. Avila, N., Carvallo, J. P., Shaw, B., & Kammen, D. M. (2017). The energy challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa: A guide for advocates and policy makers. Part 1: Generating energy for sustainable and equitable development. Oxfam Research Backgrounder Series.Google Scholar
  11. Awad, A., & Abugamos, H. (2017). Income-carbon emissions nexus for Middle East and North Africa Countries: A semi-parametric Approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(2), 152–159.Google Scholar
  12. Azam, M., & Khan, A. Q. (2016). Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A comparative empirical study for low, lower middle, upper middle and high income countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 556–567.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baloch, A., Shah, S. Z., Noor, Z. M., & Magsi, H. B. (2018). The nexus between income inequality, economic growth and environmental degradation in Pakistan. GeoJournal, 83(2), 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bello, A. K., & Abimbola, O. M. (2010). Does the level of economic growth influence environmental quality in Nigeria: A test of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis? Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ben Jebli, M., Ben Youssef, S., & Ozturk, I. (2015). The role of renewable energy consumption and trade: Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa Countries. African Development Review, 27(3), 288–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chowdhury, R. R., & Moran, E. F. (2012). Turning the curve: A critical review of Kuznets approaches. Applied Geography, 32(1), 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole, M. A., Rayner, A. J., & Bates, J. M. (1997). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: An empirical analysis. Environment and development economics, 2(4), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2017). Emission database for global atmospheric research (EDGAR). Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  19. De Bruyn, S. M., van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., & Opschoor, J. B. (1998). Economic growth and emissions: Reconsidering the empirical basis of Environmental Kuznets Curves. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dogan, E., & Turkekul, B. (2016). CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: Testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(2), 1203–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Egbetokun, S., Osabuohien, E. S., & Akinbobola, T. (2018). Feasible Environmental Kuznets and institutional quality in North and Southern African sub-regions. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 8(1), 104–115.Google Scholar
  23. Farhani, S., Mrizak, S., Chaibi, A., & Rault, C. (2014). The Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainability: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 71, 189–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gao, J., & Zhang, L. (2014). Electricity consumption-economic growth–CO2 emissions nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from panel cointegration. African Development Review, 26(2), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quartely Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hao, Y., Wu, Y., Wang, L., & Huang, J. (2018). Re-examine Environmental Kuznets Curve in China: Spatial estimations using environmental quality index. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 498–511.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kang, Y. Q., Zhao, T., & Yang, Y. Y. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emissions in China: A spatial panel data approach. Ecological Indicators, 63, 231–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (1995). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, R. C. Hill (Eds.), Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (pp. 179–222). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  30. Keho, Y. (2017). Revisiting the income, energy consumption and carbon emissions nexus: New evidence from quantile regression for different country groups. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 7(3), 356–363.Google Scholar
  31. Kivyiro, P., & Arminen, H. (2014). Carbon dioxide emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign direct investment: Causality analysis for Sub-Saharan Africa. Energy, 74, 595–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  33. Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lin, B., Omoju, O. E., Nwakeze, N. M., Okonkwo, J. U., & Megbowon, E. T. (2016). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa? Journal of Cleaner Production, 133, 712–724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. List, J. A., & Gallet, C. A. (1999). The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Does one size fit all? Ecological Economics, 31(3), 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maddison, D. (2006). Environmental Kuznets Curves: A spatial econometric approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 51(2), 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ogundari, K., Ademuwagun, A. A., & Ajao, O. A. (2017). Revisiting Environmental Kuznets Curve in Sub-Sahara Africa: Evidence from deforestation and all GHG emissions from agriculture. International Journal of Social Economics, 44(2), 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ogundipe, A. A., Alege, P. O., & Ogundipe, O. M. (2014). Income heterogeneity and Environmental Kuznets Curve in Africa. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Omisore, A. G. (2018). Attaining sustainable development goals in Sub-Saharan Africa; The need to address environmental challenges. Environmental Development, 25, 138–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Omojolaibi, J. A. (2010). Environmental quality and economic growth in some selected West African Countries: a panel data assessment of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa, 12(8), 35–48.Google Scholar
  41. Osabuohien, E. S., Efobi, U. R., & Gitau, C. M. W. (2014). Beyond the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Africa: Evidence from panel cointegration. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(4), 517–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oshin, S. O., & Ogundipe, A. A. (2015). An empirical examination of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) in West Africa. Euro-Asian Journal of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 18–28.Google Scholar
  43. Ouoba, Y. (2017). CO2 emissions and economic growth in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) Countries. Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 174–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Panayotou, T. (1997). Demystifying the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Turning a black box into a policy tool. Environment and Development Economics, 2(4), 465–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(3), 597–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raheem, I. D., & Yusuf, A. H. (2015). Energy consumption-economic growth nexus: Evidence from linear and nonlinear models in selected African countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(2), 558–564.Google Scholar
  48. Rupasingha, A., Goetz, S. J., Debertin, D. L., & Pagoulatos, A. (2004). The Environmental Kuznets Curve for US counties: A spatial econometric analysis with extensions. Papers in Regional Science, 83(2), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecological Indicators, 67, 623–636.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., Sbia, R., & Bibi, S. (2015). Does energy intensity contribute to CO2 emissions? A trivariate analysis in selected African countries. Ecological Indicators, 50, 215–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sharma, S. S. (2011). Determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: empirical evidence from 69 countries. Applied Energy, 88(1), 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Solarin, S. A., Al-Mulali, U., Musah, I., & Ozturk, I. (2017). Investigating the pollution haven hypothesis in Ghana: an empirical investigation. Energy, 124, 706–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stern, D. I. (2004). The rise and fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. World Development, 32(8), 1419–1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tang, C. F., Tan, B. W., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Energy consumption and economic growth in Vietnam. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, 1506–1514.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Twerefou, D. K., Adusah-Poku, F., & Bekoe, W. (2016). An empirical examination of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana: an ARDL approach. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 4(4), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United Nations. (2014). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 Revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). Available at: https://esa.un.org.
  58. Wagner, M. (2008). The carbon Kuznets Curve: A cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics? Resource and Energy Economics, 30(3), 388–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, Y., Kang, L., Wu, X., & Xiao, Y. (2013). Estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve for ecological footprint at the global level: A spatial econometric approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 15–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. World Bank. (2017). World development indicators. Available at: data.worldbank.org.Google Scholar
  61. You, W., & Lv, Z. (2018). Spillover effects of economic globalization on CO2 emissions: A spatial panel approach. Energy Economics, 73, 248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.05.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zoundi, Z. (2017). CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 1067–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversiti Putra MalaysiaSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsAbdul Wali Khan UniversityMardanPakistan

Personalised recommendations