Women’s bargaining power and household expenditure in Indonesia: the role of gender-differentiated assets and social capital
- 141 Downloads
Using the Indonesian setting with its cultural heterogeneity, this paper examines women’s bargaining power in the distribution of household expenditures. Women’s share of assets and participation in community-based organizations and development in the village is used to approach bargaining power. This study employs the Indonesian longitudinal dataset from the Indonesia Family Life Survey. The results show that women’s share of assets has negative effect on adult goods expenditure. This finding confirms that women’s share of asset explicitly increase women autonomy not to allocate the budget share on adult goods expenditure which is identical to male domination. Women’s share of assets also has positive and substantial effect on richer nutrients expenditure such as meat and fish and dairy products. It is also found that women participation in the community-based organization in the village has negative and significant effect on budget share of staple food and adult goods expenditure. This finding embraces the importance of women’s power in the household particularly in terms of distribution of household expenditures to the spending that increase the welfare of the household.
KeywordsIntrahousehold power Women’s asset Social capital Expenditures
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The paper is based on data analysis of publicly available secondary data-set. The survey and its procedures have been reviewed and approved by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the USA (at RAND) and in Indonesia.
- Adato, M., de la Briere, B., Mindek, D., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2000). The impact of PROGRESA on women’s status and intra-household relations. Washington, D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., & Thomas, D. (2001). Bargaining power within couples and use of prenatal and delivery care in Indonesia, CCPR-002-01. Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research, University of California.Google Scholar
- Bhagowalia, P., Menon, P., Quisumbing, A. R., & Soundararajan, V. (2010). Unpacking the links between women’s empowerment and child nutrition: Evidence using nationally representative data from Bangladesh. In: Agricultural & Applied Economics Association 2010 AAEA, CAES, & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, Denver, July 25–27.Google Scholar
- Carter, M. R., & Katz, E. (1997). Separate spheres and the conjugal contract: Understanding the impact of gender-biased development. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Doss, C., Kovarik, C., Peterman, A., Quisumbing, A. R., & van den Bold, M. (2013). Gender inequalities in ownership and control of land in Africa: Myths versus Reality, IFPRI Discussion Paper 01308. Washington, D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The construction of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., & Alderman, H. (1997). Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayashi, F. (1995). Is the Japanese extended family altruistically linked? A test based on Engel curve, NBER working paper series, WP number 5033. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- McElroy, M. B. (1997). The policy implications of family bargaining and marriage market. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: Models, methods, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Oakley, A. (1972). Gender, sex and society. London: Maurice Temple Smith.Google Scholar
- Perdana, A. A. (2006). Better together or not? Community participation, consumption smoothing and household head employment in Indonesia. Development Economics Working Paper Number 777, East Asian Bureau Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R. (1997). Better rich, or better there? Grandparent wealth, coresidence, and intrahousehold allocation, FCND DP number 23. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R., (ed.) 2003. Household decisions, gender, and development: A synthesis of recent research. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R., & de la Briere, B. (2000). Women’s assets and intrahousehold allocation in rural Bangladesh: Testing measures of bargaining power, FCND DP number 86. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R., & Mallucio, J. A. (2000). Intrahousehold allocation and gender relations: New empirical evidence from four developing countries, FCND DP number 84. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Quisumbing, A. R., & McClafferty, B. (2006). Food security in practice: Using gender research in development. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Saptari, R. (2000). Women, family and household: Tensions in culture and practice. In J. Koenig, M. Nolten, J. Rodenburg, & R. Saptari (Eds.), Women and households in Indonesia. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (1990). Gender and cooperative conflicts. In I. Tinker (Ed.), Persistent inequalities: Women and world development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Siegmann, K. A. (2003). Gender employment and equity—Effects of foreign direct investment in rural Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Bonn.Google Scholar
- Stopnitzky, Y. (2012). The bargaining power of missing women: Evidence from a sanitation campaign in India. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/37841/1/MPRA_paper_37841.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2018.
- Strauss, J., Witoelar, F., Sikoki, B., & Wattie, A. M. (2009). User’s Guide for the Indonesia family life survey, wave 4, WR-657/2-NIA/NICHD. Santa Monica: RAND.Google Scholar
- Suryakusuma, J. (1996). The state and sexuality in new order Indonesia. In L. J. Sears (Ed.), Fantasizing the feminine in Indonesia. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Thomas, D. (1997). Incomes, expenditures, and health outcomes: Evidence on intra-household resource allocation. In L. Haddad, J. Hoddinott, & H. Alderman (Eds.), Intrahousehold resource allocation in developing countries: models, methods, and policy. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Thomas, D., Contreras, D., & Frankenberg, E. (1999). Distribution of power within the household and child health. http://www.rand.org/labor/FLS/IFLS/distpow.pdf. Accessed March 28, 2008.
- Thomas, D., & Frankenberg, E. (2001). Measuring power, FCND DP number 113. Washington D. C: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Thomas, D., & Frankenberg, E. (2004). Household responses to financial crisis in Indonesia: Longitudinal evidence on poverty, resources, and well-being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- von Braun, J., Bohm, K. B., & Puetz, D. (1994). Nutritional effects of commercialization of a woman’s crop: Irrigated rice in the Gambia. In J. von Braun & E. Kennedy (Eds.), Agricultural commercialization, economic development, and nutrition. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, L. B. (1990). Development, demography, and family decision making: The status of women in rural Java. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar