GeoJournal

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 207–222 | Cite as

The nexus between income inequality, economic growth and environmental degradation in Pakistan

  • Amdadullah Baloch
  • Said Zamin Shah
  • Zaleha Mohd Noor
  • Hussian Bakhsh Magsi
Article
  • 357 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the impact of income inequality and economic growth on environmental degradation in Pakistan using ARDL bounds testing approach for the period 1966–2011. Empirical results for the aggregate CO2 emissions and its four sources such as CO2 emissions from solid fuel, liquid fuel and gaseous fuel consumption as well as electricity and heat production confirm the existence of long run co-integrated relationship between income inequality, economic growth and environment degradation. The estimated results indicate that carbon emissions increase as the income gap expands in Pakistan. Besides the negative impact of industrial share and population density on CO2 emissions, we also confirm that economic growth in Pakistan comes up with higher emissions. Hence, the hypothesis of EKC is not valid for Pakistan during the study period. Our empirical findings are robust as evidenced by dynamic ordinary least squared and the U-tests. Overall, this study suggests that the distribution of income matters to aggregate carbon emissions and focus should be made on sustained economic growth to reduce pollutants and hence CO2 emission in the study area.

Keywords

Income inequality Economic growth CO2 emissions EKC ARDL Pakistan 

References

  1. Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pakistan: An empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance, 1(12), 4–13. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00003-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, K., & Long, W. (2013). An empirical analysis of CO2 emission in Pakistan using EKC hypothesis. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 12(2), 188–200. doi: 10.1108/JITLP-10-2012-0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, H. S., Hassan, S., & Kofarmata, Y. I. (2016). Dynamic impact of income inequality on carbon dioxide emissions in Africa: New evidence from heterogeneous panel data analysis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 6(4), 760–766.Google Scholar
  4. Ali, A., Khatoon, S., Ather, M., & Akhtar, N. (2015). Modeling energy consumption, carbon emission and economic growth: Empirical analysis for Pakistan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 5(2).Google Scholar
  5. Aslanidis, N. (2009). Environmental Kuznets Curves for carbon emissions: A critical survey. Working Paper No 51. University Rovira Virgili.Google Scholar
  6. Aslanidis, N., & Iranzo, S. (2009). Environment and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions? Applied Economics, 41(6), 803–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Auffhammer, M., & Carson, R. T. (2008). Forecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 55(3), 229–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2007.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baek, J., & Gweisah, G. (2013). Does income inequality harm the environment? Empirical evidence from the United States. Energy Policy, 62(Nov), 1434–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Begum, R. A., Sohag, K., Abdullah, S. M. S., & Jaafar, M. (2015). CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 594–601. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(3), 169–178. doi: 10.1016/0921-8009(94)90198-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cobham, A., Schlögl, L., & Sumner, A. (2016). Inequality and the tails: The Palma proposition and ratio revisited. Global Policy, 7(1), 25–36. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coondoo, D., & Dinda, S. (2008). Carbon dioxide emission and income: A temporal analysis of cross-country distributional patterns. Ecological Economics, 65(2), 375–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickey, D., & Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431. doi: 10.2307/2286348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinda, S. (2004). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4), 431–455. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golley, J., & Meng, X. (2012). Income inequality and carbon dioxide emissions: The case of Chinese urban households. Energy Economics, 34(6), 1864–1872. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2012.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(May), 353–377. doi: 10.2307/2118443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halicioglu, F. (2009). An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37(3), 1156–1164. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.11.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hao, Y., Chen, H., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Will income inequality affect environmental quality? Analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Ecological Indicators, 67(8), 533–542. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heerink, N., Mulatu, A., & Bulte, E. (2001). Income inequality and the environment: Aggregation bias in Environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 38(3), 359–367. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00171-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IEA. (2015). Key trends in CO2 emissions except from: Co2 emissions from fuel combustion. International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  21. Islam, S. N. (2015). Inequality and environmental sustainability. DESA Working Paper No. 145, 30.Google Scholar
  22. Jaunky, V. C. (2011). The CO2 emissions-income nexus: Evidence from rich countries. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1228–1240. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.11.050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasuga, H., & Takaya, M. (2016). Does inequality affect environmental quality? Evidence from major Japanese cities. Journal of Cleaner Production. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.099.
  24. Kijima, M., Nishide, K., & Ohyama, A. (2010). Economic models for the Environmental Kuznets Curve: A survey. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(7), 1187–1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2010.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
  26. Lind, J. T., & Mehlum, H. (2010). With or without u? The appropriate test for a U-shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Magnani, E. (2000). The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 431–443. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00115-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martinez-Alier, J. (1995). Environmental policy and distributional conflicts. In R. Costanza (Ed.), Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability (pp. 118–136). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Martínez-Zarzoso, I., Bengochea-Morancho, A., & Morales-Lage, R. (2007). The impact of population on CO2 emissions: Evidence from European countries. Environmental & Resource Economics, 38(4), 497–512. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9096-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990. doi: 10.1080/00036840500278103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Narayan, P. K., & Narayan, S. (2010). Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: Panel data evidence from developing countries. Energy Policy, 38(1), 661–666. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nasir, M., & Ur Rehman, F. (2011). Environmental Kuznets Curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: An empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 39(3), 1857–1864. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NEAA. (2014). Trends in global CO2 emissions: 2014 Report. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency; Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (Vol. 1490).Google Scholar
  34. Panayotou, T., Peterson, A., & Sachs, J. (2000). Is the Environmental Kuznets Curve driven by structural change? What extended time series may imply for developing countries. CAER II Discussion Paper. doi: 10.1177/016001799761012334.Google Scholar
  35. Perman, R., & Stern, D. (1999). The environmental Kuznets curve: Implications of non-stationarity. Australian National University, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Ecological Economics Program.Google Scholar
  36. Perman, R. J., & Stern, D. (2003). Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the Environmental Kuznets Curve does not exist. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.. doi: 10.1111/1467-8489.00216.Google Scholar
  37. Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom (Ed.), Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century (Vol. 31, pp. 371–413). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CCOL521633230.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phillips, P. P., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ravallion, M., Heil, M., & Jalan, J. (2000). Carbon emissions and income inequality. Oxford Economic Papers, 52(4), 651–669. doi: 10.1093/oep/52.4.651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sasabuchi, S. (1980). A test of a multivariate normal mean with composite hypotheses determined by linear inequalities. Biometrika, 67(2), 429–439. doi: 10.1093/biomet/67.2.429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selden, T. M., & Song, D. (1994). Environmental quality and development: Is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(2), 147–162. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1994.1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shafik, N., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (1992). Economic growth and environmental quality: Time series and cross-country evidence. Policy Research Working Paper Series, 18(5), 55. doi: 10.1108/14777830710778328.Google Scholar
  44. Shahbaz, M., Lean, H. H., & Shabbir, M. S. (2012). Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in Pakistan: Cointegration and Granger causality. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5), 2947–2953. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Slottje, D., Nieswiadomy, M., & Redfearn, M. (2001). Economic inequality and the environment. Environmental Modelling and Software, 16(2), 183–194. doi: 10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00081-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stern, D. (2004). A multicointegration model of global climate change. Working Paper in Economics, Number 0406. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Google Scholar
  47. Stern, N. (2006). What is the economics of climate change? World Economics, 7(2), 1–10.Google Scholar
  48. Torras, M., & Boyce, J. K. (1998). Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 25(2), 147–160. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00177-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UNDESA. (2009). A global green new deal for climate, energy and development: Technical note. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. December. Google Scholar
  50. Wagner, M. (2012). The Phillips unit root tests for polynomials of integrated processes. Economics Letters, 114(3), 299–303. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, S. S., Zhou, D. Q., Zhou, P., & Wang, Q. W. (2011). CO 2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in China: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 39(9), 4870–4875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Bank. (2006). Pakistan-strategic country environmental assessment: Main report. Country environmental analysis (CEA) (Vol. I: Main Re). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  53. Zhang, Y.-J. (2011). Interpreting the dynamic nexus between energy consumption and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Russia. Energy Policy, 39(5), 2265–2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang, Y. J., & Da, Y. B. (2015). The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1255–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, Y. J., Peng, H. R., Liu, Z., & Tan, W. (2015). Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach. Energy Policy, 87, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, Y. J., Liu, Z., Zhang, H., & Tan, T. D. (2014). The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Natural Hazards, 73(2), 579–595. doi: 10.1007/s11069-014-1091-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amdadullah Baloch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Said Zamin Shah
    • 1
    • 3
  • Zaleha Mohd Noor
    • 1
  • Hussian Bakhsh Magsi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversiti Putra Malaysia, UPMSerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsLasbela University of Agriculture, Water and Marine SciencesUthalPakistan
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsIslamia College University PeshawarKhyber PakhtunkhwaPakistan

Personalised recommendations