GeoJournal

, Volume 83, Issue 2, pp 237–255 | Cite as

Using Volunteered Geographic Information to measure name changes of artificial geographical features as a result of political changes: a Libya case study

Article

Abstract

Over the past few years, political systems have changed in several countries of the Middle East as a result of citizen revolutions on the ruling regimes. These geopolitical changes have had effects on the names of artificial geographical features, such as roads and schools. Many of the names, especially those that were associated with previous regimes, were changed to become associated with the revolutions, their dates, their leaders, or their martyrs. The recent change in the paradigm of Web use towards data sharing and crowd-sourcing in the Web 2.0 provides new opportunities to get insight into a local community’s perception of political events. Crowd-sourced spatial data, often referred to as Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), can be contributed and accessed through various websites and data repositories. These data can supplement traditional data sources, such as road maps hosted by governmental offices. Libya’s governmental maps of urban infrastructure are scarce and incomplete. This provides an incentive for citizens and grassroots groups to collect and generate spatial data on their own and to express changed realities of feature names by the means of crowd-sourced mapping. Using two districts in Libya this study evaluates for five Web 2.0 platforms (OpenStreetMap, Wikimapia, Google Map Maker, Panoramio, and Flickr) to which extent VGI reflects name changes of geographical features as a result of the revolution in 2011. Other data sources, such as school directories posted by teachers on Facebook, serve as additional information for feature name change detection. Results show that the extent to which VGI reflects name changes based on the 2011 revolution in Libya varies strongly between VGI data sources. VGI provides a useful supplement to limited governmental resources to better understand how names of artificial geographical features are affected by changes in political systems.

Keywords

Volunteered Geographic Information Web 2.0 Name change Crowd-sourcing Political change Libya 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This chapter does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Alderman, D. H. (1996). Creating a new geography of memory in the South:(Re) naming of streets in honor of Martin Luther King, Jr. Southeastern Geographer, 36(1), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alderman, D. H. (2008). Place, naming, and the interpretation of cultural landscapes. In B. J. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), The Ashgate research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 195–213). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  3. Alderman, D. H., & Inwood, J. (2013). Street naming and the politics of belonging: spatial injustices in the toponymic commemoration of Martin Luther King Jr. Social and Cultural Geography, 14(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ames, M., & Naaman, M. (2007). Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 971–980). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azaryahu, M. (1997). German reunification and the politics of street names: The case of East Berlin. Political Geography, 16(6), 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azaryahu, M., & Golan, A. (2001). (Re) naming the landscape: The formation of the Hebrew map of Israel 1949–1960. Journal of Historical Geography, 27(2), 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azaryahu, M., & Kook, R. (2002). Mapping the nation: Street names and Arab-Palestinian identity: Three case studies. Nations and Nationalism, 8(2), 195–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittner, C. (2016). Diversity in Volunteered Geographic Information: comparing OpenStreetMap and Wikimapia in Jerusalem. GeoJournal. doi: 10.1007/s10708-016-9721-3.Google Scholar
  9. Brewer, G. A., Neubauer, B. J., & Geiselhart, K. (2006). Designing and Implementing E-government systems critical implications for public administration and democracy. Administration & Society, 38(4), 472–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budhathoki, N. R., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2013). Motivation for open collaboration: Crowd and community models and the case of OpenStreetMap. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(5), 548–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burns, R. (2014). Moments of closure in the knowledge politics of digital humanitarianism. Geoforum, 53, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chow, T. E. (2012). “We know who you are and we know where you live”: A research agenda for web demographics. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in theory and practice (pp. 265–285). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. B., & Kliot, N. (1992). Place-names in Israel’s ideological struggle over the administered territories. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 82(4), 653–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, D. J., Georgiadou, Y., & Labonte, J. (2009). Volunteered Geographic Information: The nature and motivation of produsers. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 4(1), 332–358.Google Scholar
  15. Couclelis, H. (2003). The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Transactions in GIS, 7(2), 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, C. E. (2007). Participatory GIS—a people’s GIS? Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 616–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elwood, S. (2008). Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: Challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elwood, S. (2010). Geographic information science: Emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Progress in Human Geography, 34(3), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elwood, S., Goodchild, M. F., & Sui, D. Z. (2012). Researching Volunteered Geographic Information: Spatial data, geographic research, and new social practice. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102(3), 571–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraser Taylor, D., & Caquard, S. (2006). Cybercartography: Maps and mapping in the information era. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 41(1), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glasze, G., & Perkins, C. (2015). Social and political dimensions of the OpenStreetMap Project: Towards a critical geographical research agenda. In J. Jokar Arsanjani, A. Zipf, P. Mooney, & M. Helbich (Eds.), OpenStreetMap in GIScience (pp. 143–166). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Goodchild, M. F. (2007a). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodchild, M. F. (2007b). Citizens as voluntary sensors: Spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0 (editorial). International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research (IJSDIR), 2, 24–32.Google Scholar
  24. Guyot, S., & Seethal, C. (2007). Identity of place, places of identities: Change of place names in post-apartheid South Africa. South African Geographical Journal, 89(1), 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and typology of participation. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 105–122). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hauthal, E., & Burghardt, D. (2016). Using VGI for analyzing activities and emotions of locals and tourists. Paper presented at the Link-VGI workshop in connection with the AGILE 2016, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  27. Hecht, B. J., & Gergle, D. (2010). On the “Localness” of user-generated content. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 229–232). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  28. Heipke, C. (2010). Crowdsourcing geospatial data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(6), 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hochmair, H. H., & Zielstra, D. (2015). Analysing user contribution patterns of drone pictures to the dronestagram photo sharing portal. Journal of Spatial Science, 60(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hollenstein, L., & Purves, R. (2010). Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr tags to describe city cores. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 1(1), 21–48.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2013). Situating the adoption of VGI by government. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 65–81). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones, C. B., Purves, R. S., Clough, P. D., & Joho, H. (2008). Modelling vague places with knowledge from the Web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(10), 1045–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Light, D. (2004). Street names in Bucharest, 1990–1997: Exploring the modern historical geographies of post-socialist change. Journal of Historical Geography, 30(1), 154–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Longueville, B., Luraschi, G., Smits, P., Peedell, S., & Groeve, T. (2010). Citizens as sensors for natural hazards: A VGI integration workflow. Geomatica, 64(1), 41–59.Google Scholar
  35. Map Maker. (2015). Countries being mapped. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/mapmaker/answer/155415?topic=1094318&hl=en. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
  36. Map Maker. (2016). Google Map Maker graduates to Google Maps. Retrieved from https://support.google.com/mapmaker/answer/7195127. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.
  37. Monmonier, M. (2006). From squaw tit to whorehouse meadow: How maps name, claim, and inflame. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012a). The annotation process in OpenStreetMap. Transactions in GIS, 16(4), 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mooney, P., & Corcoran, P. (2012b). Characteristics of heavily edited objects in OpenStreetMap. Future Internet, 4(1), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mummidi, L. N., & Krumm, J. (2008). Discovering points of interest from users’ map annotations. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neis, P., Goetz, M., & Zipf, A. (2012). Towards automatic vandalism detection in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 1(3), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neis, P., & Zielstra, D. (2014). Recent developments and future trends in Volunteered Geographic Information research: The case of OpenStreetMap. Future Internet, 6(1), 76–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neis, P., Zielstra, D., & Zipf, A. (2013). Comparison of Volunteered Geographic Information data contributions and community development for selected world regions. Future Internet, 5(2), 282–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perkins, C. (2014). Plotting practices and politics: (Im)Mutable narratives in OpenStreetMap. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39(2), 304–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poore, B. S., Wolf, E. B., Korris, E. M., Walter, J. L., & Matthews, G. D. (2012). Structures data collection for The National Map using Volunteered Geographic Information. Reston, Virginia, US Geological Survey. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2012/1209/pdf/ofr2012-1209.pdf.
  46. Rose-Redwood, R. S. (2008). From number to name: Symbolic capital, places of memory and the politics of street renaming in New York City. Social and Cultural Geography, 9(4), 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stephens, M. (2013). Gender and the GeoWeb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, 78(6), 981–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tulloch, D. L. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  50. Zelinsky, W. (1983). Nationalism in the American place-name cover. Names, 31(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zielstra, D., & Hochmair, H. H. (2013). Positional accuracy analysis of Flickr and Panoramio images for selected world regions. Journal of Spatial Science, 58(2), 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zielstra, D., Hochmair, H. H., & Neis, P. (2013). Assessing the effect of data imports on the completeness of OpenStreetMap—a United States case study. Transactions in GIS, 17(3), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zielstra, D., Hochmair, H. H., Neis, P., & Tonini, F. (2014). Areal delineation of home regions from contribution and editing patterns in OpenStreetMap. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 3(4), 1211–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zook, M., Graham, M., Shelton, T., & Gorman, S. (2010). Volunteered Geographic Information and crowdsourcing disaster relief: A case study of the Haitian earthquake. World Medical & Health Policy, 2(2), 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geomatics Program, Fort Lauderdale Research and Education CenterUniversity of FloridaFort LauderdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations