Advertisement

Effect Rate of Strain on In Situ Horizontal Coefficient of Consolidation from Pressuremeter

  • Radhi AlzubaidiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The conventional methods for evaluating the values of the coefficient of consolidation of soils usually carried out by Odometer or triaxial testing in laboratory by observing time rates of sample compression or pore water pressure dissipation during the application of a constant pressure. Attaching a small pore water pressure transducer to the membrane of the pressuremeter, enabling the measurement of the horizontal coefficient of consolidation of Glasgow glacial till. The horizontal coefficient of consolidation can be deduced in situ using the pressuremeter from the” holding tests “with the direction of pore water pressure drainage sensibly radial. The conventional method for carrying pressuremeter holding tests for measuring the horizontal coefficient of consolidation is by holding the diameter constant and allow the dissipation of pore water, the author developed a new method for measuring horizontal coefficient of consolidation by holding the pressure constant. Different rates were arranged to expand the membrane. The rate of strain showed distinctive discrepancies on the deduced values of the horizontal coefficient of consolidation during pressuremeter testing for Glasgow till.

Keywords

Pressuremeter holding tests Horizontal coefficient of consolidation Pore water Rate of strain 

Notes

References

  1. Alzubaidi R (1984) Pressuremeter practice in testing glacial till. PhD thesis, University of Strathclyde , Glasgow, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Baguelin F, Lay L, Ung SY, Sanfratello P (2009) Pressuremeter, consolidation state and settlement in fine grained soils. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. The Academia andPractice of Geotechnical Engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, pp 5–9, October 2009Google Scholar
  3. Chu J, Myint B, Chang MF, Choa V (2002) Consolidation and permeability properties of Singapore Marine Clay. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 129(9)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke BG, Carter JP, Wroth CP (1979) In-situ determination of consolidation characteristics of saturated clays. In: Proceeding of 7th European conference of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Brighton, vol 2, 2077–2212Google Scholar
  5. Dayakar P, Arumugam S, Chameau J (1998) Strain-rate effects in pressuremeter testing using a cuboidal shear device: experiments and modeling. Can Geotech J 35(1):27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jang IS, Chung CK, Kim MM, Cho MC (2003) Numerical assessment on the consolidation characteristics of clays from strain holding, self-boring pressuremeter test. Comput Geotech 30:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Randolph MF, Wroth CP (1979) An analytical solution for the consolidation around a driven pile. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 3:217–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Yin ZY (2008) Identifying parameters controlling soil delayed behavior from laboratory and in situ pressuremeter testing. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(12):1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil and Environmental Engineering, Center of Continuous Education and Professional Development, College of EngineeringUniversity of SharjahSharjahUAE

Personalised recommendations