Advertisement

Prediction of Pile Capacity of Socketed Piles Using Different Approaches

  • Aradhana MishraEmail author
  • V. A. Sawant
  • V. B. Deshmukh
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents the analysis of formerly available pile load test data of different places in Mumbai region to estimate the ultimate load carrying capacity using different empirical methods. Conducting a load test is the best way to analyse the load settlement behaviour of rock-socketed pile. But because of support reaction and time limitation, the test can’t be conducted till failure of pile. The load settlement database of six pile load test are extrapolated using different empirical methods like De Beer’s method (1967), Chin-Kondner Extrapolation method (1970), Vander Veen’s method (1953), Decourt’s method (1999) and Shen method (1980). These methods determine the yield limit load and Decourt’s method is showing satisfactory result as compared to previous case studies. The relationship between ultimate load carrying capacity and different pile diameter can be used for estimation of ultimate capacity of large diameter piles which can’t be tested using field pile load test due to economical constraints. Safe load capacity of piles is calculated according to IS 14593. For further advancement of study, relationship between socket friction and pile diameter can be recognized and comparisons between static and dynamic safe load can be illustrated.

Keywords

Rock socketed piles Load settlement curve Ultimate pile capacity Safe load Empirical methods Factor of safety 

Notes

References

  1. Basarkar SS, Dewaikar DM (2005) An empirical design approach for socketed piles in Mumbai region. Indian Geotech J 35(4):365–387Google Scholar
  2. Carrubba P (1997) Skin friction of large-diameter piles socketed into rock. Can Geotech Jr 34:230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chin FK (1970) Estimation of the ultimate load of pile not carried to failure. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Southeast Asian Conference on soil engineering, Singapore, pp 81–90Google Scholar
  4. Davisson MT (1972) High capacity piles. In: Proceedings, Lecture Series, Innovations in Foundation Construction, ASCE, Illinois Section, p 52Google Scholar
  5. De Beer EE (1967) Proefondervindliikje bijdrage tot de studie van het grensdrag vermogen van zandonder funderingen op staal. Tijdshift der Openbar Verken van Belgie, No, p 6Google Scholar
  6. Decourt L (1999) Behavior of foundations under working load conditions. In: Proceedings of the 11th pan American conference on soil mechanics and Geotechnical engineering, Foz Dulguassu, Brazil, vol 04, pp 453–488Google Scholar
  7. Dewaikar DM, Pallavi MJ (2000) Analysis of pile load tests data. J South-East Asian Geotech Soc 6(4):27–39Google Scholar
  8. Fellenius BH (2015) Basics of foundation design. Electronic edn, www.fellenius.net, p 432
  9. IS: 14593 (1998) Reaffirmed 2003. Design and construction of bored cast-in situ Piles founded on rocks guidelines, BIS, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  10. IS: 2911 Part-4 (1985) Reaffirmed 2010. Code of practice for design and construction of pile foundations. Part 4 load test on piles, BIS, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  11. Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress-strain response: cohesive soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 89(1):115–144Google Scholar
  12. Khare MG, Mhaiskar SY (2010) Pile termination criteria for rock socketed piles in Mumbai. A new approach Indian geotechnical conference IGS Mumbai Chapter, Mumbai, 16–18 Dec 2010Google Scholar
  13. Kulkarni RU, Dewaikar DM (2016a) A numerical approach to assess the capacity of rock-socketed piles subjected to axial compression in Mumbai region based on the pile load test data. Int J Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1231390 Google Scholar
  14. Kulkarni RU, Dewaikar DM (2016b) An empirical approach to assess socket friction and point resistance of axially loaded rock-socketed piles of Mumbai region. Int J Geotech Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2016.1237607 Google Scholar
  15. Kulkarni RU, Dewaikar DM (2017) Analysis of rock-socketed piles loaded in axial compression in Mumbai region based on load transfer characteristics. Int J Geotech Eng 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1343262 Google Scholar
  16. Sethna SF (1999) Geology of Mumbai and surrounding areas and its position in the Deccan Volcanic Stratigraphy. India, Journal of the Geological Society of India 53:359–365Google Scholar
  17. Stuedlein AW, Reddy SC, Evans TM (2014) Interpretation of augured cast in place pile capacity using static loading tests. DFI J 8(1):39–47.  https://doi.org/10.1179/1937525514Y.0000000003 Google Scholar
  18. Van Der Veen C (1953) The bearing capacity of the pile. In: Proceedings of the third ICSM FE, pp 84–90Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aradhana Mishra
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. A. Sawant
    • 1
  • V. B. Deshmukh
    • 2
  1. 1.Indian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia
  2. 2.Veermata Jijabai Technological InstituteMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations