Advertisement

Experimental Study on the Width of the Reasonable Segment Pillar of the Extremely Soft Coal Seam in the Deep Mine

  • Bo WangEmail author
  • Fuxing Jiang
  • Chao Wang
  • Bin Zhang
Original Paper
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Various dynamic disasters will happen in the extremely soft coal seam mining process of Gob-side entry in the deep mine, including large deformation of roadways, rock burst, gas unusual, floor water invasion, spontaneous combustion of coal seam and so on. Therefore, a reasonable segment pillar will not only avoid the dynamic disasters in the excavating process, but also improve the resource utilization. Taking the goaf working face of extremely soft coal seam in the deep mine in one particular mine of Shandong Province as the engineering example, this paper first analyzes optional locations of the gob-side entry, finding that the gob-side entry should be located in the low stress block and it’s the most favorable to keep small pillars and goafs isolated. Then, it is found that small surrounding rock deformation of gob-side entry takes place in the driving process through the numerical simulation, and the deformation will increase with the increasing width of the chain pillar. The surrounding rock deformation of gob-side entry increases in the stoping stage. Small width of the chain pillar will easily result in the instability of the roadway. As the swivel angle of the basic roof increases, the surrounding rock deformation of gob-side entry will accordingly increase. Finally, the numerical calculation and on-spot mine pressure monitoring illustrate that the width of the segment pillar in the gob-side entry should be 5–7 m, with 6 m the best.

Keywords

Extremely soft coal seam Gob-side entry Segment pillar Numerical simulation Mine pressure monitoring 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the State Key Research Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0801408) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51674014, 51634001), which are gratefully acknowledged. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for constructive comments that helped to improve the quality of the paper.

References

  1. Bai JB, Hou CJ, Huang HF (2004) Numerical simulation study on stability of narrow coal pillar of roadway driving along goaf. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(20):3475–3479Google Scholar
  2. Cai MF, He MC, Liu DY (2002) Rock mechanics and engineering. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng YH, Tang JX, Zhu XK et al (2010) Analysis and application in controlling surrounding rock of support reinforced roadway in gob-side entry with fully mechanized. Int J Min Sci Technol 6(6):841–845Google Scholar
  4. Dou LM, Lu CP, Mu ZL et al (2009) Prevention and forecasting of rock burst hazards in coal mines. Min Sci Technol 19(5):585–591Google Scholar
  5. Fei XM (2008) The status of support technology on gob-side entry retaining roadway and existing problem discussion. Chin Sci Technol Inf 7:48–49Google Scholar
  6. Han CQ, Zhang KZ, Xu XB et al (2007) Study on failure regularity and reasonable dimension of district sublevel small coal pillar. J Min Saf Eng 24(3):370–373Google Scholar
  7. He MC, Gao YB, Yang J et al (2017) An innovative approach for gob-side entry retaining in thick coal seam longwall mining. Energies 10(11):1785Google Scholar
  8. Hua XZ (2006) Development status and improved proposals on gob-side entry retaining support technology in China. Coal Sci Technol 34:78–81Google Scholar
  9. Jiang YD, Pan YS, Jiang FX et al (2014) State of the art review on mechanism and prevention of coal bumps in China. J China Coal Soc 39(2):205–213Google Scholar
  10. Lan TW, Zhang HW, Li S et al (2013) Multi-factor pattern recognition method for predicting mine rock burst risk. China Saf Sci J 23(3):33–38Google Scholar
  11. Li L, Tang C, Liang Z et al (2009) Numerical simulation on water inrush process due to activation of collapse columns in coal seam floor. J Min Saf Eng 26(2):158–162Google Scholar
  12. Li S, Li JW, Fan CJ et al (2015) Roof subsidence laws and control technology for gob-side entry retaining in fully-mechanized top-coal caving face. J China Coal Soc 40(9):1989–1994Google Scholar
  13. Li H, Bai HB, Wu JJ et al (2017) A cascade disaster caused by geological and coupled hydro-mechanical factors-water inrush mechanism from karst collapse column under confining pressure. Energies 10(12):1938Google Scholar
  14. Liu JH, Jiang FX, Wang NG et al (2012) Research on reasonable width of segment pillar of fully mechanized caving face in extra-thick coal seam of deep shaft. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 31(5):921–927Google Scholar
  15. Mallikarjun P, Satya H, Liu SM (2011) Gas diffusion behavior of coal and its impact on production from coalbed methane reservoirs. Int J Coal Geol 86(4):342–348Google Scholar
  16. Pan LY, Zhang LJ, Liu XG (2006) Burst prediction and prevention of practical techniques. China University of Mining and Technology Press, XuzhouGoogle Scholar
  17. Qi QX, Li XL, Zhao SK (2013) Theory and practices on stress control of mine pressure bumping. Coal Sci Technol 41(6):1–5Google Scholar
  18. Shi XF, Jiang FX, Zhu ST et al (2017) Mechanism of integrated dynamic disaster of rockburst and water inrush: a new type of integrated dynamic disaster in China. Geotech Geol Eng 35(3):1261–1270Google Scholar
  19. Wang Z, Yin GZ, Hu QT et al (2010) Inducing and transforming conditions from rock burst to coal-gas outburst in a high gassy coal seam. J Min Saf Eng 27(4):572–575Google Scholar
  20. Wang JC, Jiang FX, Meng XJ et al (2016a) Mechanism of rock burst occurrence in specially thick coal seam with rock parting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49(5):1953–1965Google Scholar
  21. Wang SL, Hao SP, Chen Y et al (2016b) Numerical investigation of coal pillar failure under simultaneous static and dynamic loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 84:59–68Google Scholar
  22. Wang ZK, Yang P, Lyu WS et al (2018) Study of the backfill confined consolidation law and creep constitutive model under high stress. Geotech Test J 41(2):390–402Google Scholar
  23. Yang HY, Cao SG, Wang SQ et al (2016) Adaptation assessment of gob-side entry retaining based on geological factors. Eng Geol 209:143–151Google Scholar
  24. Yavuz H (2004) An estimation method for cover pressure re-establishment distance and pressure distribution in the goaf of longwall coal mines. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(2):193–205Google Scholar
  25. Zhang KZ, Xia JM, Jiang JQ (2004) Variation law of quantity of coal dust in drill hole and its application to determination of reasonable width of coal pillars. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23(8):1307–1310Google Scholar
  26. Zhang N, Yuan L, Han CL et al (2012) Stability and deformation of surrounding rock in pillar less gob-side entry retaining. Saf Sci 50(4):593–597Google Scholar
  27. Zhang Z, Bai J, Chen Y et al (2015) An innovative approach for gob-side entry retaining in highly gassy fully-mechanized longwall top-coal caving. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:1–11Google Scholar
  28. Zhang, Canbulat I, Bruce H et al (2017) Assessing coal burst phenomena in mining and insights into directions for future research. Int J Coal Geol 179:28–44Google Scholar
  29. Zhao HC, Kaunda R (2018) Numerical assessment of the influences of gas pressure on coal burst liability. Energies 11(2):260Google Scholar
  30. Zhu S, Liu R, Zhang S et al (2016) Characteristics of deformation and failure of deep coal seam floor affected by fully mechanized mining. Geotech Test J 39(1):1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Civil and Resources EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina
  2. 2.Yanzhou Coal Mining Ordos Energy Chemical Co., LtdOrdosChina

Personalised recommendations