Geotechnical and Geological Engineering

, Volume 37, Issue 6, pp 4777–4787 | Cite as

Evaluation of Hydraulic Fracturing and Overcoring Methods to Determine and Compare the In Situ Stress Parameters in Porous Rock Mass

  • D. S. SubrahmanyamEmail author
Original Paper


There are various methods to determine in situ stress parameters, but each method is having its own advantages and limitations. Among the methods available, the hydraulic fracturing method is the most commonly adopted procedure for in situ stress measurements because of its simplicity, reliability and economic viability. But, the limitations with this technique are that some assumptions implicit for this method such as that the rock mass is continuous and elastic. Moreover, the reliability and validity of this method becomes questionable in porous rocks that may encounter in underground tunnels. These limitations are experienced ever since the introduction of this method, especially in porous rocks. In general, the recognition of fracture initiation in the hydraulic fracturing test has not proved difficult. The relatively slow rates of pressurisation have ensured that when fracture initiation occurs, the sudden increase in volume has led to a marked drop in pressure in the porous section, which is easily recognised from the pressure record (Sjoberg et al. in Int J Rock Mech 40:999–1010, 2003). But the drop-in pressure in a porous rock is far more difficult to recognise. This is since pressure cannot be developed if the rate of leakage in the formation is equal to or higher than the flow rate applied for fracture initiation. This problem of non-generation of water pressure can be tackled by use of a high viscosity fluid. Stress measurement were conducted by hydraulic fracturing method by using high viscous liquid in porous rocks. The stresses evaluated by this technique were correlated with stress measured by overcoring method. The stress measured by overcoring method was used as bench-mark as this method does not suffer from the presence of porosity of the rock. This new technique will be helpful in conducting the stress measurements in porous rocks, which will be highly beneficial to both mining and hydropower related excavation.


Hydraulic fracturing Porous rocks High viscous liquid Normal stress Fracture initiation Overcoring 



Author is extremely thankful to Secretary and other staff of Ministry of Mines, Govt. of India and 40th Standing Scientific Advisory Group for sanctioning the project. All the fieldwork under this project was done at Singareni Collieries Company Ltd. This involved lot of planning, co-ordination and concentrated efforts of the management and ground staff at the test sites. Author is also thankful to Mr. C. Nagaraj and Mr. D. Joseph, Mr. G. Shyam and Mr. K. Vamshidhar, Scientists of NIRM for associating in the field work and their cooperation for successful completion of the report. Author is also thankful to our Director, National Institute of Rock Mechanics for providing encouragement and valuable suggestions as the work is progressed, and for extending the facilities for carrying out the work.


  1. Amadei B (1985) Applicability of the theory of hollow inclusions for overcoring stress measurements in rock. J Rock Mech Rock Eng 18:107–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cornet FH (1986) Stress determination from hydraulic tests on preexisting fractures method. In: International symposium on rock stress & rock stress masurements, Stockholm, Centek Publications, Lulea, pp 301–312Google Scholar
  3. Cornet FH, Burlet D (1992) Stress field determinations in France by hydraulic tests in boreholes. J Geophys Res 97:11829–11849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dean AK (1978) Manufacturing procedures for the tri-axial hollow inclusion stress gauge. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research organisation, Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
  5. Doe T, et al. (1981) Hydraulic fracturing and overcoring stress measurements in a deep borehole at Stripa test mine. In: Proceedings of United States symposium on rock mechanics. MIT Publications. Cambridge, pp 373–378Google Scholar
  6. Haimson BC (1968) Hydraulic fracturing in porous and nonporous rock and its potential for determining in situ stresses at great depth. Ph.D. thesis. University of Minnesota. p 234Google Scholar
  7. Price Jones A, Whittle RA, Hobbs NB (1984) Measurement of in situ rock stresses by overcoring. Tunn Tunn Int 16:12–14Google Scholar
  8. Rummel F (1986) Fracture mechanics approach to hydraulic fracturing stress measurements. Fracture mechanics rocks. Academic press, London, pp 217–239Google Scholar
  9. Sjoberg J, Christiansson R, Hudson JA (2003) ISRM Suggested methods for rock stress estimation—Part 2: overcoring methods. Int J Rock Mech 40:999–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Stephansson O (1983) State of the art and future plans about hydraulic fracturing stress measurements in Sweden. In: Proceedings of hydrofracture stress measurements. Monterey. National Academy Press. Washington DC, pp 260–267Google Scholar
  11. Worotnicki G, Walton RJ (1976) Triaxial hollow inclusion gauges for determination of rock stresses in situ. In: ISRM symposium advances of stress measurements, Sydney, The Institution of Engineers, Australia, Suppl. pp 1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geotechnical Engineering DepartmentNational Institute of Rock MechanicsBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations