Evaluation of the Validity of Groutability Prediction Formulas by Means of Superfine Cement Grouts

  • Murat Mollamahmutoğlu
  • Eyubhan AvciEmail author
Original Paper


Extensive laboratory grouting tests were conducted using ultrafine cement suspensions to evaluate the validity and reliability of groutability prediction formulas proposed by several researchers for the cement based grouts of soils. Initially, such basic rheological properties as setting time, viscosity and stability of ultrafine cement suspensions with or without dispersive agent were studied. Next, the penetration performance of suspensions into various graded medium to fine sand specimens prepared at different relative densities was investigated. Finally, the grouting test results were compared with those obtained from groutability prediction formulas and it was found out that the proposed prediction formulas could not be used as a sole and exclusive criterion to predict the groutability of soils.


Groutability Prediction formulas Ultrafine cement Penetration 



  1. Akbulut S, Sağlamer A (2002) Estimating the groutability of granular soils: a new approach. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 17:371–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM C191-04 (2004) Standard test method for time of setting of hydraulic cement by vicat needle. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM C940-98A (1998) Standard test method for expansion and bleeding of freshly mixed grouts for preplaced-aggregate concrete in the laboratory. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D2196-15 (2015) Standard test methods for rheological properties of non-newtonian materials by rotational viscometer. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  5. ASTM D4222-63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  6. ASTM D4253-00 (2000) Standard test method for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  7. ASTM D4254-00 (2000) Standards test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  8. Axelsson M, Gustafson G, Fransson A (2009) Stop mechanism for cementitious grouts at different water-to-cement ratio. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:49–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Azadi MR, Taghichian A, Taheri A (2017) Optimization of cement-based grouts using chemical additives. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 4:623–637. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burwell EB (1985) Cement and clay grouting of foundations: practice of the corps of engineering. J Soil Mech Found Div 84:1551/1–1551/22Google Scholar
  11. El Mohtar CS, Ritika JY, Jaffal SH (2017) Transferring innovative research into practical wisdom: the case of permeation grouting. Innov Infrastruct Solut 2:1–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gamil Y, Bakar I, Ahmed K (2017) Simulation and development of instrumental setup to be used for cement grouting of sand soil. Ital J Sci Eng 1:16–27. Google Scholar
  13. Hashimoto K, Nishihara S, Oji S, Kanazawa T, Nishie S, Seko I, Hyodo T, Tsukamoto Y (2016) Field testing of permeation grouting using microfine cement. Gr Improv 169:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang CL, Fan JC, Yang WJ (2007) A study of applying microfine cement grout to sandy silt soil. Sino Geotech 111:71–82Google Scholar
  15. Huang CL, Fan JC, Liao KW, Lien TH (2013) A methodology to build a groutability formula via a heuristic algorithm. KSCE J Civ Eng 17:106–116. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ivanova I, Nefedov S, Pustovgar A, Adamtsevich A, Aleksey E (2016) Comparison of laboratory methods for the design of injection grouts based on microfine cements. Procedia Eng 165:1536–1541. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Krizek RJ, Liao HJ, Borden RH (1992) Mechanical properties of microfine cement/sodium silicate grouted sand. ASCE Spec Techn Publ Grouting 1:688–699Google Scholar
  18. Markou IN, Droudakis AI (2013) Shear strength of microfine cement grouted sands. Gr Improv 166:177–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Markou IN, Christodoulou DN, Papadopoulos BK (2015) Penetrability of microfine cement grouts: experimental investigation and fuzzy regression modeling. Can Geotech J 52:868–882. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell JK (1981) Soil improvement state of the art report. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Publications Committee of X. ICSMFE, Stockholm, pp 509–565Google Scholar
  21. Mozumder RA, Laskar AI, Hussain M (2018) Penetrability prediction of microfine cement grout in granular soil using Artificial Intelligence techniques. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 72:131–144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raman KV, Dayakar P, Raju KVB (2015) Study on permeation grouting with cement and chebulic myrobalan grout in sandy soils. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 4:4448–4456. Google Scholar
  23. Warner J (2004) Practical handbook of grouting. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringGazi UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringBursa Technical UniversityYıldırım-BursaTurkey

Personalised recommendations