Farmyard manure improves phosphorus use efficiency in weathered P deficient soil

  • Andry AndriamananjaraEmail author
  • Tovohery Rakotoson
  • Tantely Razafimbelo
  • Lilia Rabeharisoa
  • Marie-Paule Razafimanantsoa
  • Dominique Masse
Original Article


Crop production is limited by low soil fertility in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), particularly by P deficiency due to strong fixation by Fe and Al oxyhydroxides. Organic amendments are known to increase P availability in fertilizer and in such soils by different mechanisms. This study investigated the effect of adding farmyard manure (FYM) versus mineral triple super phosphate (TSP) fertilizer on P availability in different cropping systems. Field experiments were conducted in three succeeding summer seasons to compare two different upland cropping systems: a Bambara (Vigna subterranea)–rice rotation and a rice–rice system on a highly P deficient Ferralsol. Nine treatments including sole TSP at 0, 10, 20, 30 kg P ha−1 year−1, and sole FYM at 0, 10, 20, 30 kg P ha−1 year−1 (i.e. 100% FYM substitution), and combined FYM and TSP (FYM + TSP) at 20, 30 kg P ha−1 year−1 (i.e. 50% and 67% FYM substitution, respectively) were applied. Results showed that FYM treatments increased Bambara and rice grain yields compared to TSP treatment alone particularly in year three. Phosphorus uptake efficiency was higher in FYM treatments combined or not with TSP in year three of the experiment. The notable response to FYM was associated with increased agronomic efficiency resulting from additional C originating from the FYM with a low initial soil C content, (around 2%), and the effect of liming that reduced soil P sorption thereby improving P availability from FYM. Partial (67%) substitution of TSP by FYM increased grain yields of Bambara by 1.67 Mg ha−1 and of rice by 1.01 Mg ha−1 compared to TSP alone in year three at the highest P rate (30 kg P ha−1). The effect of FYM could be linked to inputs of C and nutrients from added FYM and to the indirect effect on soil physico–chemical properties including soil pH, soil moisture, soil biological activity, low P capacity sorption. This study confirms that application of FYM can help minimize rates of TSP applied in smallholder farms in SSA.


Legume-rice cropping system Organic fertilizer P availability Triple super phosphate 



This work was funded by Corus2 N°6049. We are grateful to our colleagues from LRI who helped with the fieldwork. We acknowledge Rakotondrabesa Tiana for supervising field trials. We also thank anonymous reviewers for their helpful recommendations.

Supplementary material

10705_2019_10022_MOESM1_ESM.docx (283 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 283 kb)


  1. Andriamananjara A, Rakotoson T, Razanakoto OR et al (2018) Farmyard manure application in weathered upland soils of Madagascar sharply increase phosphate fertilizer use efficiency for upland rice. Field Crop Res 222:94–100. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriamananjara A, Chevallier T, Masse D et al (2019) Land management modifies the temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in a Ferralsol. Appl Soil Ecol 138:112–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cong PT, Merckx R (2005) Improving phosphorus availability in two upland soils of Vietnam using Tithonia diversifolia H. Plant Soil 269:11–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Core Team R (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  5. Dakora FD, Phillips DA (2002) Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low-nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245:35–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dijkstra F, Carrillo Y, Pendall E, Morgan J (2013) Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective. Front Microbiol 4:216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dobermann A (2007) Nutrient use efficiency–measurement and management. In: Kraus A, Isherwood K, Heffer P (eds) Proceeding of international fertilizer industry association, Brussels, Belgium, pp 1–22Google Scholar
  8. Drevon J-J, Abadie J, Alkama N et al (2015) Phosphorus use efficiency for N fixation in the rhizobial symbiosis with legumes. In: de Bruijn FJ (ed) Biological nitrogen fixation, 1st edn. Wiley, pp 455–464Google Scholar
  9. Föhse D, Claassen N, Jungk A (1988) Phosphorus efficiency of plants. Plant Soil 110:101–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. George TS, Fransson A-M, Hammond JP, White PJ (2011) Phosphorus nutrition: rhizosphere processes, plant response and adaptations. In: Bünemann E, Oberson A, Frossard E (eds) Phosphorus in action: biological processes in soil phosphorus cycling. Springer, Berlin, pp 245–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti MG (2011) Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: conventional vs. organic agriculture. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:95–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guppy CN, Menzies NW, Moody PW, Blamey FPC (2005) Competitive sorption reactions between phosphorus and organic matter in soil: a review. Soil Res 43:189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hao XH, Liu SL, Wu JS et al (2008) Effect of long-term application of inorganic fertilizer and organic amendments on soil organic matter and microbial biomass in three subtropical paddy soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 81:17–24. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hati KM, Mandal KG, Misra AK et al (2006) Effect of inorganic fertilizer and farmyard manure on soil physical properties, root distribution, and water-use efficiency of soybean in Vertisols of central India. Bioresour Technol 97:2182–2188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haynes RJ (1984) Lime and phosphate in the soil–plant system. Adv Agron 37:249–315. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haynes RJ, Mokolobate MS (2001) Amelioration of Al toxicity and P deficiency in acid soils by additions of organic residues: a critical review of the phenomenon and the mechanisms involved. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 59:47–63. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haynes RJ, Naidu R (1998) Influence of lime, fertilizer and manure applications on soil organic matter content and soil physical conditions: a review. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 51:123–137. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinsinger P, Betencourt E, Bernard L et al (2011) P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiol 156:1078–1086. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hue NV (1991) Effects of organic acids/anions on P sorption and phytoavailability in soils with different mineralogies. Soil Sci 152:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jiang D, Hengsdijk H, Dai T-B et al (2006) Long-term effects of manure and inorganic fertilizers on yield and soil fertility for a winter wheat-maize system in Jiangsu, China 11 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30030090) and the National High-Tech Research. Pedosphere 16:25–32. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan A, Lu G, Ayaz M et al (2018) Phosphorus efficiency, soil phosphorus dynamics and critical phosphorus level under long-term fertilization for single and double cropping systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:1–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li C, Dong Y, Li H et al (2016) Shift from complementarity to facilitation on P uptake by intercropped wheat neighboring with faba bean when available soil P is depleted. Sci Rep 6:18663. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liang Q, Chen H, Gong Y et al (2012) Effects of 15 years of manure and inorganic fertilizers on soil organic carbon fractions in a wheat-maize system in the North China Plain. Nutr Cycl Agroecosystems 92:21–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu M, Hu F, Chen X et al (2009) Organic amendments with reduced chemical fertilizer promote soil microbial development and nutrient availability in a subtropical paddy field: the influence of quantity, type and application time of organic amendments. Appl Soil Ecol 42:166–175. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liu Z, Rong Q, Zhou W, Liang G (2017) Effects of inorganic and organic amendment on soil chemical properties, enzyme activities, microbial community and soil quality in yellow clayey soil. PLoS ONE 12:1–20. Google Scholar
  26. Mahmood F, Khan I, Ashraf U et al (2017) Effects of organic and inorganic manures on maize and their residual impact on soil physico-chemical properties. J Soil Sci plant Nutr 17:22–32Google Scholar
  27. Murphy J, Riley JP (1962) A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta 27:31–36. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nawara S, Van Dael T, Merckx R et al (2017) A comparison of soil tests for available phosphorus in long-term field experiments in Europe. Eur J Soil Sci 68:873–885. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neto AP, Favarin JL, Hammond JP et al (2016) Analysis of phosphorus use efficiency traits in Coffea genotypes reveals Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora have contrasting phosphorus uptake and utilization efficiencies. Front Plant Sci 7:408. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nziguheba G, Merckx R, Palm CA, Rao MR (2000) Organic residues affect phosphorus availability and maize yields in a Nitisol of western Kenya. Biol Fertil Soils 32:328–339. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nziguheba G, Zingore S, Kihara J et al (2016) Phosphorus in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: implications for agricultural intensification. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104:321–340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Opala PA, Othieno CO, Okalebo JR, Kisinyo PO (2010) Effects of combining organic materials with inorganic phosphorus sources on maize yield and financial benefits in western Kenya. Exp Agric 46:23–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Otinga AN, Pypers P, Okalebo JR et al (2013) Partial substitution of phosphorus fertiliser by farmyard manure and its localised application increases agronomic efficiency and profitability of maize production. Field Crop Res 140:32–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Palm CA, Myers RJK, Nandwa SM (1997) Combined use of organic and inorganic nutrient sources for soil fertility maintenance and replenishment. In: Buresh RJ, Sanchez PA, Calhoun F (eds) Replenishing soil fertility in Africa. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 193–217Google Scholar
  35. Pukhovskiy AV (2013) Ability of Mitscherlich–Spillman model to estimate critical soil phosphate levels. Int J Nutr Food Sci 2:45–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pypers P, Huybrighs M, Diels J et al (2007) Does the enhanced P acquisition by maize following legumes in a rotation result from improved soil P availability? Soil Biol Biochem 39:2555–2566. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rabeharisoa L, Razanakoto OR, Razafimanantsoa M-P et al (2012) Larger bioavailability of soil phosphorus for irrigated rice compared with rainfed rice in Madagascar: results from a soil and plant survey. Soil Use Manag 28:448–456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rakotoson T, Rabeharisoa L, Smolders E (2016) Effects of soil flooding and organic matter addition on plant accessible phosphorus in a tropical paddy soil: an isotope dilution study. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 179:765–774. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ros M, Hernandez MT, Garcia C (2003) Soil microbial activity after restoration of a semiarid soil by organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 35:463–469. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schröder J (2005) Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresour Technol 96:253–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Veldhoven PP, Mannaerts GP (1987) Inorganic and organic phosphate measurements in the nanomolar range. Anal Biochem 161:45–48. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wahbi S, Prin Y, Thioulouse J et al (2016) Impact of wheat/faba bean mixed cropping or rotation systems on soil microbial functionalities. Front Plant Sci 7:1364. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire des RadioisotopesUniversité d’AntananarivoAntananarivoMadagascar
  2. 2.UMR Eco&Sols, Institut de recherche pour le développement (IRD)Univ MontpellierMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations