Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 115, Issue 1, pp 57–67 | Cite as

Fertilizer-induced fluxes dominate annual N2O emissions from a nitrogen-rich temperate fen rewetted for paludiculture

  • Tanka P. KandelEmail author
  • Sandhya Karki
  • Lars Elsgaard
  • Poul Erik Lærke
Original Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

Rewetted peatlands are weak to negligible sources of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). However, rewetted peatlands in use for paludiculture may require nitrogen (N) fertilization potentially creating hot moments for denitrification and N2O emissions. In this study, we measured N2O emissions from an N-rich riparian fen for two consecutive years using static chambers. The field experiment included side-by-side plots cultivated with reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) under different degrees of manipulated rewetting. The treatments were defined as control, semi-flooded and flooded conditions corresponding to 2-year weighted mean groundwater table (GWT) depths of 9, 3 and 1 cm below soil surface, respectively. The crop was fertilized and harvested twice a year (160 kg N ha−1 year−1 in two equal splits). Large N2O emissions were observed from all treatments after each fertilization event, which contributed to cumulative annual emissions of 3.2–6.0 kg N2O–N ha−1 in the first year and 1.8–4.2 kg N2O–N ha−1 in the second year. Emissions outside the fertilization periods were negligible. Annual N2O emissions were similar (P > 0.05) among the treatments in the first year whereas control treatments had the lowest emissions in the second year. Nitrogen removal in harvested biomass (197–218 kg N ha−1 year−1) exceeded the fertilizer N in all treatments, indicating that the cultivated biomass utilized substantial amounts of mineralized N from the peat soil. Overall, the results indicate that fertilizer-induced N2O emissions can be high although background soil emissions are low when high GWT is maintained on N-rich riparian peatland.

Keywords

N fertilizer N2O flux Organic soil Paludiculture Rewetting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the Innovation Fund Denmark under the EU FACCE-ERA-NET+ on Climate Smart Agriculture as a part of the CAOS Project (www.caos-project.eu) and the PEATWISE Project (http://eragas.eu/index.php/research-projects/peatwise) in the frame of the ERA-NET FACCE ERA-GAS. FACCE ERA-GAS has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 696356. The authors like to express their gratitude for assistance provided by Jens B. Kjeldsen and the team of technicians from AU-Foulumgård in crop managements and harvesting. We also like to extend our gratitude for technical assistance of Bodil Stensgaard, Henrik Nørgaard, Jørgen M. Nielsen, Michael Koppelgaard, Morten Skov and Suman Thapa.

Supplementary material

10705_2019_10012_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Baggs EM, Philippot L (2011) Nitrous oxide production in terrestrial environment. In: Moir JWB (ed) Nitrogen cycling in bacteria. Molecular analysis. Caister Academic Press, pp 211–232Google Scholar
  2. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roal Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 57:289–300Google Scholar
  3. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann Stat 29:1165–1188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blain D et al (2014) Rewetted organic soils. In: Hiraishi T et al (eds) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands. Chapter 3. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  5. Drewer J, Lohila A, Aurela M, Laurila T, Minkkinen K, Penttilä T, Dinsmore KJ, McKenzie RM, Helfter C, Flechard C, Sutton MA, Skiba UM (2010) Comparison of greenhouse gas fluxes and nitrogen budgets from an ombotrophic bog in Scotland and a minerotrophic sedge fen in Finland. Eur J Soil Sci 61:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eickenscheidt T, Heinichen J, Augustin J, Freibauer A, Drösler M (2014) Nitrogen mineralization and gaseous nitrogen losses from waterlogged and drained organic soils in a black alder (Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn.) forest. Biogeosciences 11:2961–2976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellermann T, Bossi R, Nygaard J, Christensen J, Løfstrøm P, Monies C, Grundahl L, Geels C, Nielsen IE, Poulsen MB (2018) Atmosfærisk deposition 2016, NOVANA. Scientific Report no 264 from National Center for climate and energy, Aarhus University. http://dce2.au.dk/pub/SR264.pdf (in Danish)
  8. Giannini V, Silvestri N, Dragoni F, Pistocchi C, Sabbatini T, Bonari E (2017) Growth and nutrient uptake of perennial crops in a paludicultural approach in a drained Mediterranean peatland. Ecol Eng 103:478–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoffmann CC, Kronvang B, Audet J (2011) Evaluation of nutrient retention in four restored Danish riparian wetlands. Hydrobiologia 674:5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huth V, Jurasinski G, Glatzel S (2012) Winter emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide from a minerotrophic fen under nature conservation management in north–east Germany. Mires Peat 10:1–13Google Scholar
  12. Kandel TP, Elsgaard L, Karki S, Lærke PE (2013) Biomass yield and greenhouse gas emissions from a drained fen peatland cultivated with reed canary grass under different harvest and fertilizer regimes. BioEnergy Res 6:883–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kandel TP, Lærke PE, Elsgaard L (2018) Annual CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions from a temperate peat bog at natural water table and drained for permanent grass, cereals and potato. Agric For Meteorol 256:470–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kandel TP, Lærke PE, Hoffmann CC, Elsgaard L (2019) Complete annual CO2, CH4, and N2O balance of a temperate riparian wetland 12 years after rewetting. Ecol Eng 127:527–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karki S, Elsgaard L, Audet J, Lærke PE (2014) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from reed canary grass in paludiculture: effect of groundwater level. Plant Soil 383:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karki S, Elsgaard L, Lærke PE (2015) Effect of reed canary grass cultivation on greenhouse gas emission from peat soil at controlled rewetting. Biogeosciences 12:595–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Klemedtsson L, von Arnold K, Weslien P, Gundersen P (2005) Soil CN ratio as a scalar parameter to predict nitrous oxide emissions. Glob Change Biol 11:1142–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kløve B, Berglund K, Berglund Ö, Weldon S, Maljanen M (2017) Future options for cultivated Nordic peat soils: can land management and rewetting control greenhouse gas emissions? Environ Sci Policy 69:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Labouriau R (2018) Applied statistical laboratory: pairwise comparison. http://home.math.au.dk/rodrigo/astatlab/software/pairwisecomparisons/. Accessed 8 Mar 2019
  20. Lohila A, Aurela M, Hatakka J, Pihlatie M, Minkkinen K, Penttilä T, Laurila T (2010) Responses of N2O fluxes to temperature, water table and N deposition in a northern boreal fen. Eur J Soil Sci 61:651–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maljanen M, Hytönen J, Mäkiranta P, Alm J, Minkkinen K, Laine J, Martikainen PJ (2007) Greenhouse gas emissions from cultivated and abandoned organic croplands in Finland. Boreal Environ Res 12:133–140Google Scholar
  22. Maljanen M, Sigurdsson BD, Guðmundsson J, Óskarsson H, Huttunen JT, Martikainen PJ (2010) Greenhouse gas balances of managed peatlands in the Nordic countries—present knowledge and gaps. Biogeosciences 7:2711–2738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ministry of Environment and Food of Denmark (2015) Bekendtgørelse om tilskud til naturprojekter på kulstofrige lavbundsjorder [Executive Order on Subsidies for Nature Projects on Carbon-rich Lowlands]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=176431 (in Danish)
  24. Myhre G et al (2013). Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Stocker TF et al (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen AL, Hald AB, Larsen SU, Lærke, PE Møller HB (2013) Potassium as a mean to increase production and NP-capture from permanent grassland on organic soils. Grassland science in Europe 18:569–571. In: Proceedings of the 17th symposium of the European grassland federation, Akureyri, Iceland, 23–26 June 2013Google Scholar
  26. Pedersen AR, Petersen SO, Schelde K (2010) A comprehensive approach to soil-atmosphere trace-gas flux estimation with static chambers. Eur J Soil Sci 61:888–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petersen SO, Hoffmann CC, Schäfer C-M, Blicher-Mathiesen G, Elsgaard L, Kristensen K, Larsen SE, Torp SB, Greve MH (2012) Annual emissions of CH4 and N2O, and ecosystem respiration, from eight organic soils in Western Denmark managed by agriculture. Biogeosciences 9:403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  29. Regina K, Syväsalo E, Hannukkala A, Esala M (2004) Fluxes of N2O from farmed peat soils in Finland. Eur J Soil Sci 55:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saari P, Saarnio S, Heinonen J, Alm J (2013) Emissions and dynamics of N2O in a buffer wetland receiving water flows from a forested peatland. Boreal Environ Res 18:164–180Google Scholar
  31. Silvan N, Regina K, Kitunen V, Vasander H, Laine J (2002) Gaseous nitrogen loss from a restored peatland buffer zone. Soil Biol Biochem 34:721–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Snyder CS, Davidson EA, Smith P, Venterea RT (2014) Agriculture: sustainable crop and animal production to help mitigate nitrous oxide emissions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 9:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Venterea RT, Parkin TB, Cardenas L, Petersen SO, Pedersen AR (2012) Data analysis considerations. In: de Klein CAM, Harvey MJ (eds) Nitrous oxide chamber methodology guidelines. Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases, Wellington, pp 95–121Google Scholar
  34. Vinther FP (1984) Total denitrification and the ratio between N2O and N2 during the growth of spring barley. Plant Soil 76:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wichtmann W, Schäfer A  (2007) Alternative management options for degraded fens—utilisation of biomass from rewetted peatlands. In: Okruszko T, Maltby E, Szatylowicz J, Swiatek D, Kotowski W (eds) Wetlands: monitoring, modeling and management. Taylor & Francis, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  36. Wilson D et al (2016) Greenhouse gas emission factors associated with rewetting of organic soils. Mires Peat 17:1–28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgroecologyAarhus University Interdisciplinary Centre for Climate ChangeTjeleDenmark
  2. 2.Noble Research Institute, LLCArdmoreUSA
  3. 3.Delta Water Management Research UnitUSDA-ARSJonesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations