Advertisement

Nutrient use efficiency and crop yield response to the combined application of cattle manure and inorganic fertilizer in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Gudeta W. SileshiEmail author
  • Bashir Jama
  • Bernard Vanlauwe
  • Wakene Negassa
  • Rebbie Harawa
  • Abednego Kiwia
  • David Kimani
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The combined application of cattle manure and inorganic fertilizer has been widely recommended in the context of integrated soil fertility management (ISFM) on smallholder farms in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the conditions under which this combination (hereafter ISFM) improves nutrient and water use efficiency and crop yields have not been systematically studied. Therefore, we undertook a meta-analysis of studies conducted in rain-fed maize production systems across SSA with the objective of (1) quantifying the magnitude of improvement in grain yield, rain use efficiency (RUE), agronomic efficiency of nitrogen (AEN) and phosphorus (AEP) due to ISFM; (2) determining conditions under which ISFM achieves greater yield response, RUE, AEN and AEP; and (3) compare yield responses to the substitutive and additive approaches of ISFM with sole application of cattle manure. Application of high rates of cattle manure in combination with high N fertilizer rates increased yield response only by 27.5%, but it achieved 47% lower AEN and 27% lower AEP relative to a combination of low manure and low N fertilizer rate. The substitutive approach of ISFM achieved 54% greater AEN and 16% greater AEP than the additive ISFM approach. Yield response and AEN also significantly varied with soil type. On most soil types, AEN was 2–195% lower under sole manure than under ISFM or sole fertilizer. We recommend application of moderate rates of cattle manure (5–10 t ha−1) combined with moderate doses of N fertilizer (< 50 kg N ha−1) on responsive soils to optimize AEN and maize yield response.

Keywords

Additive ISFM Agronomic efficiency Substitutive ISFM Water use efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for the generous funding for this work. We are also grateful to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on the draft manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10705_2019_9974_MOESM1_ESM.docx (140 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 140 kb)

References

  1. Batjes NH (2011) Global distribution of soil phosphorus retention potential. ISRIC—world soil information (with dataset), Wageningen, ISRIC report 2011/06Google Scholar
  2. Chikowo R, Corbeels M, Mapfumo P, Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE (2010) Nitrogen and phosphorus capture and recovery efficiencies, and crop responses to a range of soil fertility management strategies in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 88:59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chivenge P, Vanlauwe B, Six J (2011) Does the combined application of organic and mineral nutrient sources influence maize productivity? A meta-analysis. Plant Soil 342:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dick J, Kaya B, Soutoura M, Skiba U, Smith R, Niang A, Tabo R (2008) The contribution of agricultural practices to nitrous oxide emissions in semi-arid Mali. Soil Use Manag 24:292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eghball B,Wienhold BJ, Gilley JE, Eigenberg RA (2002) Mineralization of manure nutrients. Biological Systems Engineering: Papers and Publications. Paper 139. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/biosysengfacpub/139. Accessed 01 June 2016
  6. Esse PC, Buerkert A, Hiernaux P, Assa A (2001) Decomposition of and nutrient release from ruminant manure on acid sandy soils in the Sahelian zone of Niger, West Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. FAO and ITPS (2015) Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR)—main report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and Intergovernmental Technical Panel on Soils, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  8. Feise RJ (2002) Do multiple outcome measures require P value adjustment? BMC Med Res Method 2:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gardner JB, Drinkwater LE (2009) The fate of nitrogen in grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of 15N field experiments. Ecol Appl 19:2167–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrity D, Dixon J, Boffa J-M (2012) Understanding African farming systems: science and policy implications. Australia Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Sydney, p 55Google Scholar
  11. Han Z, Walter MT, Drinkwater LE (2017) N2O emissions from grain cropping systems: a meta-analysis of the impacts of fertilizer-based and ecologically-based nutrient management strategies. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 107:335–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatfield JL, Sauer TJ, Prueger JH (2001) Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agron J 93:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heathcote A, Brown S, Wagenmakers EJ, Eidels A (2010) Distribution-free tests of stochastic dominance for small samples. J Math Psychol 54:454–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80:1150–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jama B, Kimani D, Kiwia A, Rebbie H, Sileshi GW (2017) Maize yield response, nitrogen use efficiency and financial returns to fertilizer on smallholder farms in southern Africa. Food Secur 9:577–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ju X, Xing G, Chen X et al (2009) Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:3041–3046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kihara J, Nziguheb G, Zingore S, Coulibaly A, Esilaba A, Kabambe V, Njoroge S, Palm C, Huising J (2016) Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 229:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kihara J, Sileshi WG, Nziguheba G, Kinyua M, Zingore S, Sommer R (2017) Application of secondary nutrients and micronutrients increase crop yields in sub-Saharan Africa. Agron Sustain Dev 37:25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0431-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim D-G, Kirschbaum MUF, Beedy TL (2016) Carbon sequestration and net emissions of CH4 and N2O under agroforestry: synthesizing available data and suggestions for future studies. Agric Ecosyst Environ 226:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ladha JK, Pathak H, Krupnik TJ, Six J, van Kessel C (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospect and prospects. Adv Agron 87:85–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lekasi JK, Tanner JC, Kimani SK, Harris PJC (2003) Cattle manure quality in Maragua District, Central Kenya: effect of management practices and development of simple methods of assessment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linquist BA, Ruark MD, Hill JE (2011) Soil order and management practices control soil phosphorus fractions in managed wetland ecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 90:51–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maeda K, Hanajima D, Morioka R, Toyoda S, Yoshida N, Osada T (2013) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emission from the cattle manure composting process by use of a bulk agent. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 59:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maillard É, Angers DA (2014) Animal manure application and soil organic carbon stocks: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 20:666–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mapanda F, Wuta M, Nyamangara J, Rees RM (2012) Nitrogen leaching and indirect nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized croplands in Zimbabwe. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 94:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masaka J, Wuta M, Nyamangara J, Mugabe FT (2013) Effect of manure quality on nitrate leaching and groundwater pollution in wetland soil under field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill var. Heinz) rape (Brassica napus, L var. Giant). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 96:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Masaka J, Nyamangara J, Wuta M (2016) Nitrous oxide emissions from wetland soil amended with two types of cattle manure. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric 5:125–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mori A, Hojito M (2015) Effect of dairy manure type and supplemental synthetic fertilizer on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a grassland in Nasu, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mugwira LM, Murwira HK (1997) Use of cattle manure to improve soil fertility in Zimbabwe. Soil fertility network research results working paper 2, CIMMYT, Harare, ZimbabweGoogle Scholar
  30. Mujuru L, Rusinamhodzi L, Nyamangara J, Hoosbeek MR (2016) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and manure application on storage of carbon and nitrogen under continuous maize cropping in Arenosols and Luvisols of Zimbabwe. J Agric Sci 154:242–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murwira HR (1994) Synchrony relationships of nitrogen release and plant uptake in a Zimbabwean sand soil amended with manure and fertilize nitrogen. Afr Crop Sci J 2:69–77Google Scholar
  32. Musinguzi P, Tenywa JS, Ebanyat P, Tenywa MM, Mubiru DN, Basamba TA, Leip A (2013) Soil organic carbon thresholds and nitrogen management in tropical agroecosystems: concepts and prospects. J Sustain Dev 6:31–43Google Scholar
  33. Negassa W, Sileshi GW (2018) Integrated soil fertility management reduces termite damage to crops on degraded soils in western Ethiopia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 251:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyamangara N, Bergström LF, Piha MI, Giller KE (2003) Fertilizer use efficiency and nitrate leaching in a tropical sandy soil. J Environ Qual 32:599–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nziguheba G, Zingore S, Kihara J, Merckx R, Njoroge S, Otinga A, Vandamme A, Vanlauwe B (2016) Phosphorus in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa: implications for agricultural intensification. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 104:321–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Petersen SO, Sommer SG (2011) Ammonia and nitrous oxide interactions; roles of manure organic matter management. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:503–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rockström J (2003) Water for food and nature in drought–prone tropics: vapour shift in rain-fed agriculture. Philos Trans R Soc B 358:1997–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Russo TA, Tully K, Palm C, Neill C (2017) Leaching losses from Kenyan maize cropland receiving different rates of nitrogen fertilizer. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 108:195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sanchez PA (2015) En route to plentiful food production in Africa. Nat Plants 1:1–2Google Scholar
  40. Sanchez PA, Denning GL, Nziguheba G (2009) The African Green Revolution moves forward. Food Secur 1:37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-009-0011-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sileshi GW, Nhamo N, Mafongoya PL, Tanimu J (2017) The stoichiometry of animal manure and its implications for nutrient cycling and agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 107:91–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sterne JAC, Egger M (2001) Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1046–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vanlauwe B, Aihou K, Aman S, Iwuafor ENO, Tossah BK, Diels J, Sanginga N, Lyasse O, Merckx R, Deckers J (2001) Maize yield as affected by organic inputs and urea in the West African moist savanna. Agron J 93:1191–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vanlauwe B, Kihara J, Chivenge P, Pypers P, Coe R, Six J (2011) Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management. Plant Soil 339:35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vanlauwe B, Descheemaeker K, Giller KE, Huising J, Merckx R, Nziguheba G, Wendt J, Zingore S (2015) Integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: unravelling local adaptation. Soil 1:491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang X, Jia Z, Liang L, Yang B, Ding R, Nie J, Wang J (2016) Impacts of manure application on soil environment, rainfall use efficiency and crop biomass under dryland farming. Sci Rep 6:20994.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang W, Liu K, Wang J, Shao X, Xu M, Li J, Wang X, Murphy DV (2015) Relative contribution of maize and external manure amendment to soil carbon sequestration in a long term intensive maize cropping system. Sci Rep 5:10791.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gudeta W. Sileshi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Bashir Jama
    • 3
  • Bernard Vanlauwe
    • 4
  • Wakene Negassa
    • 5
  • Rebbie Harawa
    • 6
  • Abednego Kiwia
    • 6
  • David Kimani
    • 6
  1. 1.LusakaZambia
  2. 2.School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalPietermaritzburgSouth Africa
  3. 3.Islamic Development BankJeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  4. 4.International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)NairobiKenya
  5. 5.Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental SciencesUniversity of RostockRostockGermany
  6. 6.Alliance for Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA)Westlands, NairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations