Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 51–62 | Cite as

Greenhouse gas emissions from rice field cultivation with drip irrigation and plastic film mulch

  • Oluwasegun Olamide FawibeEmail author
  • Kanako Honda
  • Yuki Taguchi
  • Sangsoo Park
  • Akihiro Isoda
Original Article


Ground cover rice production system is a promising technique with potentials to alleviate the effect of the increasing water-scarcity on rice production. Hence, finding appropriate management practices under this system is crucial for reducing global warming without yield loss. In this study, CH4 and N2O were quantified and contrasted in drip irrigation with plastic-film-mulch system (DP) and a continuous flooded rice cultivation system (CF) during two rice growing seasons of 2016 and 2017. The range of methane fluxes observed between irrigation regimes was (− 0.36 to 0.43 mg m−2 h−1) and (− 0.77 to 4.66 mg m−2 h−1) in 2016 and 2017 respectively. The cumulative CH4 emissions in 2017 under CF and DP were 16 times and 5 times higher than in 2016 respectively. DP reduced cumulative CH4 flux by 194% and 69% in 2016 and 2017 respectively compared to CF. Emissions of N2O were low and insignificant for both irrigation regimes. Grain yields were comparable between irrigation regimes with an insignificant reduction of 19% and 5% under DP in 2016 and 2017 respectively. The GWP of the 2-year average was 89% reduced under DP compared to CF. Our findings demonstrated that the DP mitigated GHGs while sustaining rice yield as a result of low nitrogen fertilization application and intermittent soil saturation level.


CH4 Drip irrigation with plastic mulch GWP N2Rice yield 



We express our gratitude to Xinjiang Tianyuan Institute of Rice Drip Irrigation System, for a financial support to construct an experimental paddy. We sincerely appreciate the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions which help to improve the earlier version of the manuscript. We also thank Professor Inubushi, K. of Soil Science Laboratory, Chiba University for providing laboratory assistance, and for his contributions to this study.


This study was partly funded by JSPS KAKENHI (JP 16K07570).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. Ahn J, Choi M, Kim B, Lee J, Song J, Kim G, Weon H (2014) Effect of water-saving irrigation on emissions of greenhouse gases and prokaryotic communities in rice paddy soil. Microb Ecol 68:271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angel R, Matthies D, Conrad R (2011) Activation of methanogenesis in arid biological soil crusts despite the presence of oxygen. PLoS ONE 6:e20453. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker T, Bashmakov I, Bernstein L et al (2007) Technical summary. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Battle M, Bender M, Sowers T, Tans PP, Butler JH, Elkins JW, Ellis JT, Conway T, Zhang N, Lang P, Clarke AD (1996) Atmospheric gas concentrations over the past century measured in air from fin at the south pole. Nature 383:231–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger S, Jang I, Seo J, Kang H, Gebauer G (2013) A record of N2O and CH4 emissions and underlying soil processes of Korean rice paddies as affected by different water management practices. Biogeochemistry 2013:1–16Google Scholar
  6. Cai Z, Xing G, Yan X, Xu H, Tsuruta H, Yagi K, Minami K (1997) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice paddy fields as affected by nitrogen fertilizers and water management. Plant Soil 196:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai ZC, Xing GX, Shen GY, Xu H, Yan XY (1999) Measurements of CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddies in Fengqiu, China. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 45:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicerone RJ, Oremland RS (1998) Biogeochemical aspects of atmospheric methane. Global Biogeochem Cycles 2:299–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson EA, Swank WT (1986) Environmental parameters regulating gaseous nitrogen losses from two forested ecosystems via nitrification and denitrification. Appl Environ Microb 52:1287–1292Google Scholar
  10. FAO (2006) Guidelines for soil description, 4th edn. Publishing Management Service. FAO, Rome, pp 1–109Google Scholar
  11. Hadi A, Inubushi K, Yagi K (2010) Effect of water management on greenhouse gas emissions and microbial properties of paddy soils in Japan and Indonesia. Paddy Water Environ, 8:319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He H, Ma F, Yang R, Chen L, Jia B, Cui J, Fan H, Wang X, Li L (2013) Rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation. PLoS ONE 8(12):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inubushi K, Cheng W, Aonuma S, Hoque MM, Kobayashi K, Miura S, Kim YH, Okadas M (2003) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on CH4 emission from a rice paddy field. Global Change Biol 9:1458–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2007) The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2014) Fifth Assessment Report, 2014 (AR5). Global warming potential values. Greenhouse Gas Protocol, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  16. Jain N, Pathak H, Mitra S, Bhatia A (2004) Emission of methane from rice fields—a review. J Sci Ind Res 63:101–115Google Scholar
  17. Kanno T, Miura Y, Tsuruta H, Minami K (1997) Methane emission from rice paddy fields in all Japanese prefecture: relationship between emission rates and soil characteristics, water treatment, and organic matter application. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 49:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kima AS, Chung WG, Wang Y (2014) Improving irrigated lowland rice water use efficiency under saturated soil culture for adoption in tropical climate conditions. Water 6:2830–2846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreye C, Dittert K, Zheng X, Zhang X, Lin S, Tao H, Sattelmacher B (2007) Fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide in water-saving rice production in north China. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 77:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Zhang R, Wang X, Chen F, Lai D, Tian C (2014) Effect of plastic film mulching with drip irrigation on N2O and CH4 emissions from cotton fields in arid land. J Agric Sci 152:534–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mancosu N, Snyder RL, Kyriakakis G, Spano D (2015) Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water 7:975–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maris SC, Teira-Esmatges MR, Arbones A, Rufat J (2015) Effect of irrigation, nitrogen application and nitrification inhibitor on nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide and methane emissions from olive (Olea europaea L.) orchard. Sci Total Environ 538:966–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Millar N, Baggs EM (2005) Relationships between N2O emissions and water-soluble C and N contents of agroforestry residues after their addition to soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:605–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minamikawa K, Yagi K, Tokida T, Sander BO, Wassmann R (2012) Appropriate frequency and time of day to measure methane emissions from an irrigated rice paddy in Japan using the manual closed chamber method. Greenhouse Gas Meas Manage 2:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Minamikawa K, Tokida T, Sudo S, Padre A, Yagi K (2015) Guidelines for measuring CH4 and N2O emissions from rice paddies by a manually operated closed chamber method. National Institute for Agro-Environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, pp 38–60Google Scholar
  26. Naser HM, Nagata O, Tamura S, Hatano R (2007) Methane emissions from five paddy fields with different amount of rice straw application in central Hokkaido, Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 53(1):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oo AZ, Sudo S, Inubushi K, Mano M, Yamamoto A, Ono K, Osawa T, Hayashida S, Patra PK, Terao Y, Elayakumar P, Vanitha K, Umamageswari C, Jothimani P, Ravi V (2018) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from conventional and modified rice cultivation systems in South India. Agric Ecosyst Environ 252:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Qin Y, Liu S, Guo Y, Liu Q, Zou J (2010) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from organic and conventional rice cropping systems in Southeast China. Biol Fertil Soils 46:825–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rath CK, Das SN, Thakur RS (2000) Methane emission from the flooded rice field. J Sci Ind Res 59:107–113Google Scholar
  30. Rickman JF, Pyseth M, Bunna S (2001) Direct seeding of rice in Cambodia. In: Fukai S, Basnayake J (eds) Increased lowland rice production in the Mekong Region: Proceedings of an International Workshop held in Vientiane, Laos, 30 October–2 November 2000. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR), Canberra, pp 60–65Google Scholar
  31. Ruser R, Sehy U, Weber A, Gutser R, Munch JC (2008) Main driving variables and effect of soil management on climate or ecosystem-relevant trace gas fluxes from fields of the FAM in perspectives for agroecosystem management: balancing environmental and socio-economic demands. Elsevier, London, pp 79–120Google Scholar
  32. Schjonning P, Thomsen IK, Moldrup P, Christensen BT (2003) Linking soil microbial activity to water- and air-phase contents and diffusivities. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:156–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Skiba U, Smith KA (2000) The control of nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural and natural soils. Chemosphere 2:379–386Google Scholar
  34. Suddick EC, Steenwerth GM, Smart DR, Six J (2011) Discerning agricultural management effects on nitrous oxide emissions from conventional and alternative cropping systems: a California case study. In: Chapter 4 of ACS symposium series of American Chemical Society, pp 204–226Google Scholar
  35. Tao Y, Zhang Y, Jin X, Saiz G, Jing R, Guo L, Liu M, Shi J, Zuo Q, Tao H, Butterbach-Bahl K, Dittert K, Lin S (2015) More rice with less water-evaluation of yield and resource use efficiency in ground cover rice production system with transplanting. Eur J Agron 68:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson P, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang JY, Jia JX, Xiong ZQ, Khalil MAK, Xing GX (2011) Water regime-nitrogen fertilizer-straw incorporation interaction: a field study on nitrous oxide emissions from a rice agroecosystem in Nanjing, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang W, Dalal R, Reeves S, Butterbach-Bahl K, Kiese R (2011) Greenhouse gas fluxes from an Australian subtropical cropland under long-term contrasting management regimes. Glob Change Biol 17:3089–3101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Watanabe AT (2010) Changes in community structure and transcriptional activity of methanogenic archaea in a paddy field soil brought about by a water-saving practice-estimation by PCR-DGGE and qPCR of 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA. In: 19th World Congress of Soil ScienceGoogle Scholar
  40. Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH, Dokken DJ (1996) Climate Change 1995, impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific–technical analyses, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 879Google Scholar
  41. Weller S, Kraus D, Ayag KRP, Wassmann R, Alberto MCR, Butterbach-Bahl K, Kiese R (2015) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice and maize production in diversified rice cropping systems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 101:37–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu J, Guo W, Feng J, Li L, Yang H, Wang X, Bian X (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions from cotton field under different irrigation methods and fertilization regimes in arid northwestern China. Sci World J 2014:1–10Google Scholar
  43. Yagi K, Minami K (1990) Effect of organic matter application on methane emission from some Japanese paddy fields. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 36(4):599–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yang S, Peng S, Xu J, Luo Y, Li D (2012) Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy field as affected by water-saving irrigation. Phys Chem Earth 53:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yao Z, Du Y, Tao Y, Zheng X, Liu C, Lin S, Butterbach-Bahl K (2014) Water-saving ground cover rice production reduces net greenhouse gas fluxes in an annual rice-based cropping system. Biogeosciences 11:6221–6236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oluwasegun Olamide Fawibe
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kanako Honda
    • 1
  • Yuki Taguchi
    • 1
  • Sangsoo Park
    • 1
  • Akihiro Isoda
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate School of HorticultureChiba UniversityMatsudoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Pure and Applied BotanyFederal University of Agriculture, AbeokutaAbeokutaNigeria

Personalised recommendations