Advertisement

Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

, Volume 115, Issue 2, pp 231–247 | Cite as

Agronomic effects of biochar and wastewater irrigation in urban crop production of Tamale, northern Ghana

  • Edmund Kyei Akoto-Danso
  • Delphine Manka’abusi
  • Christoph Steiner
  • Steffen Werner
  • Volker Häring
  • George Nyarko
  • Bernd Marschner
  • Pay Drechsel
  • Andreas BuerkertEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Agricultural production needs to increase, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, many rural people are undernourished, and the urban population is growing rapidly. It is worrisome that on many West African soils with low cation exchange capacity and soil organic carbon content, mineral fertilization is rather inefficient. Under these conditions, wherever available untreated wastewater is used for irrigation despite the potential health risks to producers and consumers. For intensively cultivated soils with high mineralization rates, biochar application has been advocated as a promising management option. However, the agronomic benefits of wastewater reuse in agriculture and its interaction with biochar have received only limited attention. This study therefore investigated the effects of mineral fertilizer application and biochar amendment at two water quality and quantity levels on soil moisture, plant nutrition and biomass production on a Petroplinthic Cambisol over 2 years. Rice husk biochar applied at 20 t ha−1 significantly increased fresh matter yields in the first five cropping cycles by 15%, and by 9% by the end of 2 years. Compared with clean water, wastewater irrigation increased yields 10–20-fold on unfertilized plots during the dry seasons, while a fourfold increment was observed in the wet seasons. This seasonal difference is likely a result of the high sequence of irrigation events during the dry season. In this study, fertigation with wastewater contributed significantly to plant nutrition and nutrient recovery while yield-increasing biochar effects disappeared over time. Soil moisture was enhanced by up to 9% due to biochar amendments under unfertilized conditions.

Keywords

Fertigation Soil moisture Urban agriculture Wastewater 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out within the framework of the UrbanFoodPlus Project under the GlobE-Research initiative for the Global Food Supply (FKZ: 031A242-A,B), jointly funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Federal Ministry for Economic Coorperation and Development (BMZ). We are grateful for the assistance of our laboratory technicians Eva Wiegard and Claudia Thieme-Fricke, our field technician William Danquah and the farmers Mohammed Abdallah, Abdul Rahaman, Yussif Yakubu and Mutalah Alhassan. Dr. Kofi Atiah produced and characterized the biochar, we thank the University for Development Studies (UDS) in Tamale, Ghana, in particular Prof. Dr. Gordana Kranjac-Berisavljevic for multiple support. This study contributed to the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems.

Supplementary material

10705_2018_9926_MOESM1_ESM.docx (6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 6119 kb)

References

  1. Agegnehu G, Bass AM, Nelson PN, Bird MI (2016) Benefits of biochar, compost and biochar–compost for soil quality, maize yield and greenhouse gas emissions in a tropical agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 543:295–306.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Amponsah O, Vigre H, Schou TW et al (2015) Assessing low quality water use policy framework: case study from Ghana. Resour Conserv Recycl 97:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargmann I, Rillig MC, Kruse A et al (2014) Effects of hydrochar application on the dynamics of soluble nitrogen in soils and on plant availability. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 177:48–58.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201300069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass AM, Bird MI, Kay G, Muirhead B (2016) Soil properties, greenhouse gas emissions and crop yield under compost, biochar and co-composted biochar in two tropical agronomic systems. Sci Total Environ 550:459–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.143 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Biederman LA, Harpole SW (2013) Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: a meta-analysis. GCB Bioenergy 5:202–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter S, Shackley S, Sohi S et al (2013) The impact of biochar application on soil properties and plant growth of pot grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and cabbage (Brassica chinensis). Agronomy 3:404–418.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I et al (2007) Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 45:629–634.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR07109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Climate-data.com (2016) Climate: Tamale. http://en.climate-data.org/location/667/. Accessed 1 Jan 2016
  9. Cornelissen G, Martinsen V, Shitumbanuma V et al (2013) Biochar effect on maize yield and soil characteristics in five conservation farming sites in Zambia. Agronomy 3:256–274.  https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy3020256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drechsel P, Keraita B (2014) Irrigated urban vegetable production in Ghana: characteristics, benefits and risk mitigation, 2nd edn. International Water Management Institute, ColumboGoogle Scholar
  11. Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T et al (2012) Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol 114:644–653.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. FAO (2005) Fertilizer use by crop in Ghana. Trop Agric 47Google Scholar
  13. FAO Ecocrop data sheet—Lactuca sativa var. capitata. http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srv/en/dataSheet?id=1313. Accessed 13 Oct 2016
  14. FAO, ITPS (2015) Status of the World’s Soil Resources—Main Report. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and Interfovernmental Technical Panel on Soil, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  15. Gandahi AW, Baloch SF, Sarki MS et al (2015) Impact of rice husk biochar and macronutrient fertilizer on fodder maize and soil properties. Int J Biosci 7:12–21.  https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/7.4.12-21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao S, DeLuca TH (2016) Influence of biochar on soil nutrient transformations, nutrient leaching, and crop yield. Adv Plants Agric Res.  https://doi.org/10.15406/apar.2016.04.00150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Githinji L (2014) Effect of biochar application rate on soil physical and hydraulic properties of a sandy loam. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:457–470.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2013.821698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W (2002) Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—a review. Biol Fertil Soils 35:219–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graefe S, Schlecht E, Buerkert A (2008) Opportunities and challenges of urban and peri-urban agriculture in Niamey, Niger. Outlook Agric 37:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Mukome FND et al (2015) Biochar production and applications in sub-Saharan Africa: opportunities, constraints, risks and uncertainties. J Environ Manag 150:250–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gwenzi W, Muzava M, Mapanda F et al (2016) Comparative short-term effects of sewage sludge and its biochar on soil properties, maize growth and uptake of nutrients on a tropical clay soil in Zimbabwe. J Integr Agric 15:1395–1406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61154-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haefele SM, Konboon Y, Wongboon W et al (2011) Effects and fate of biochar from rice residues in rice-based systems. F Crop Res 121:430–440.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haering V, Manka’busi D, Akoto-Danso EK, Werner S, Atiah K, Steiner C, Lompo DJP, Adiku S, Buerkert A, Marschner B (2017) Effects of biochar and waste water irrigation on soil properties in West African urban agriculture. Nat Sci Rep 7:10738.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10718-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M (2013) Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma 209–210:188–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hussain I, Raschid L, Hanjira M et al (2002) Wastewater use in agriculture. Review of impacts and methodological issues in valuing impacts. International Water Management Institute, ColumboGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeffery S, Verheijen FGA, van der Velde M, Bastos AC (2011) A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application to soils on crop productivity using meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 144:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kamara A, Kamara HS, Kamara MS (2015) Effect of rice straw biochar on soil quality and the early growth and biomass yield of two rice varieties. Agric Sci 6:798–806.  https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2015.68077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergstrom I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—Results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140:309–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiziloglu FM, Turan M, Sahin U et al (2008) Effects of untreated and treated wastewater irrigation on some chemical properties of cauliflower (Brassica olerecea L. var. botrytis) and red cabbage (Brassica olerecea L. var. rubra) grown on calcareous soil in Turkey. Agric Water Manag 95:716–724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Knicker H (2010) “Black nitrogen”—an important fraction in determining the recalcitrance of charcoal. Org Geochem 41:947–950.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2010.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kulmatiski A, Beard KH (2006) Activated carbon as a restoration tool: potential for control of invasive plants in abandoned agricultural fields. Restor Ecol 14:251–257.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00127.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lal R (2013) Climate-strategic agriculture and the water-soil-waste nexus. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176:479–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. Sci Technol 1:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lehmann J, Da Silva JP, Steiner C et al (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. Plant Soil 249:343–357.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022833116184 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lentz RD, Ippolito JA (2012) Biochar and manure affect calcareous soil and corn silage nutrient concentrations and uptake. J Environ Qual 41:1033–1043.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0126 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma N, Zhang L, Zhang Y et al (2016) Biochar improves soil aggregate stability and water availability in a mollisol after three years of field application. PLoS ONE 11:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Major J, Rondon M, Molina D et al (2010) Maize yield and nutrition during 4 years after biochar application to a Colombian savanna oxisol. Plant Soil 333:117–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0327-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Manickam T, Cornelissen G, Bachmann RT et al (2015) Biochar application in Malaysian sandy and acid sulfate soils: soil amelioration effects and improved crop production over two cropping seasons. Sustainability 7:16756–16770.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215842 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mikkelsen RL, Harthz TK, Rusan MM (2015) Challenges of increasing water and nutrient efficiency in irrigated agriculture. In: Drechsel P, Heffer P, Magen H et al (eds) Managing water and fertilizer for sustainable agricultural intensification, 1st edn. Industry Association (IFA), International Water Management Institute (IWMI), International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), and International Potash Institute (IPI), Paris pp 168–186Google Scholar
  40. Mohammad MJ, Mazahreh N (2003) Changes in soil fertility parameters in response to irrigation of forage crops with secondary treated wastewater. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 34:1281–1294.  https://doi.org/10.1081/Css.-120020444 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Munda S, Nayak A, Mishra P et al (2015) Combined application of rice husk biochar and fly ash improved the yield of low land rice. Soil Res.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR15295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Novak JM, Busscher WJ, Watts DW et al (2012) Biochars impact on soil-moisture storage in an ultisol and two aridisols. Soil Sci 177:310–320.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SS.0b013e31824e5593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nyantakyi-Frimpong H, Arku G, Inkoom DKB (2016) Urban agriculture and political ecology of health in municipal Ashaiman, Ghana. Geoforum 72:38–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paneque M, De la Rosa JM, Franco-Navarro JD et al (2016) Effect of biochar amendment on morphology, productivity and water relations of sunflower plants under non-irrigation conditions. CATENA 147:280–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.07.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pfister M, Saha S (2016) Effects of biochar and fertilizer management on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) feedstock and soil properties. Arch Agron Soil Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1228894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Qadir M, Sharma BR, Bruggeman A et al (2007) Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries. Agric Water Manag 87:2–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Quilliam RS, DeLuca TH, Jones DL (2013) Biochar application reduces nodulation but increases nitrogenase activity in clover. Plant Soil 366:83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1411-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanchez PA (2002) Ecology. Soil fertility and hunger in Africa. Science 295:2019–2020.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065256 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. SAS Institute Inc (2009) SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, CaryGoogle Scholar
  50. Sathya S, Pitchai GJ, Indirani R, Kannathasan M (2008) Effect of fertigation on availability of nutrients (N, P & K) in soil—a review. Agric Rev 29:214–219Google Scholar
  51. Schnell RW, Vietor DM, Provin TL et al (2012) Capacity of biochar application to maintain energy crop productivity: soil chemistry, sorghum growth, and runoff water quality effects. J Environ Qual.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0077 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Scott CA, Faruqui NI, Raschid-Sally L (2004) Wastewater use in irrigated agriculture: management challenges in developing countries. In: Scott C, Faraqui N, Raschid-Sally L (eds) Wastewater use in irrigated agriculture. Coordinating the livelihood and environmental realities. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh A, Agrawal M (2012) Effects of waste water irrigation on physical and biochemical characteristics of soil and metal partitioning in Beta vulgaris L. Agric Res 1:379–391.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-012-0044-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Singh PK, Deshbhratar PB, Ramteke DS (2012) Effects of sewage wastewater irrigation on soil properties, crop yield and environment. Agric Water Manag 103:100–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2011.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM et al (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41:973–989.  https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2011.0069 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Steiner C, Teixeira WG, Lehmann J et al (2007) Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant Soil 291:275–290.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9193-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steiner C, Glaser B, Teixeira WG et al (2008) Nitrogen retention and plant uptake on a highly weathered central Amazonian Ferralsol amended with compost and charcoal. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 171:893–899.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625199 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tully K, Sullivan C, Weil R, Sanchez P (2015) The state of soil degradation in sub-Saharan Africa: baselines, trajectories, and solutions. Sustainability 7:6523–6552.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. UN (2013) World population prospects: the 2012 revision, highlights and advance tables. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.228Google Scholar
  60. Xiaoa Q, Zhua L, Shena Y, Li S (2016) Sensitivity of soil water retention and availability to biochar addition in rainfed semi-arid farmland during a three-year field experiment. F Crop Res.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2008.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yamato M, Okimori Y, Wibowo IF et al (2006) Effects of the application of charred bark of Acacia mangium on the yield of maize, cowpea and peanut, and soil chemical properties in South Sumatra, Indonesia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 52:489–495.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00065.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhang D, Pan G, Wu G et al (2016) Biochar helps enhance maize productivity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions under balanced fertilization in a rainfed low fertility inceptisol. Chemosphere 142:106–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.04.088 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edmund Kyei Akoto-Danso
    • 1
  • Delphine Manka’abusi
    • 1
  • Christoph Steiner
    • 1
  • Steffen Werner
    • 2
  • Volker Häring
    • 2
  • George Nyarko
    • 3
  • Bernd Marschner
    • 2
  • Pay Drechsel
    • 4
  • Andreas Buerkert
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Organic Plant Production and Agroecosystems Research, Tropics and SubtropicsUniversität KasselWitzenhausenGermany
  2. 2.Department for Soil Science and Soil Ecology, Institute of GeographyRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany
  3. 3.Faculty of AgricultureUniversity for Development StudiesTamaleGhana
  4. 4.Rural-Urban LinkagesInternational Water Management Institute (IWMI)ColomboSri Lanka

Personalised recommendations