Advertisement

International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 216, Issue 1, pp 71–85 | Cite as

Characterization of hydraulic fracture geometry in shale rocks through physical modeling

  • Weihong Wang
  • Kan WuEmail author
  • Jon Olson
Original Paper
  • 209 Downloads

Abstract

In unconventional shale reservoirs, the presence of natural fractures is common and widespread. Multi-stage hydraulic fracture treatments are used to generate complex fracture geometry and stimulate reservoirs to unlock hydrocarbon in unconventional reservoirs. Natural fractures further complicate the complexity of the fracture geometry. In this paper, the objective is to investigate the impact of natural fractures on multiple hydraulic fracture propagation using an in-house fracture propagation model. We have developed a complex hydraulic fracture model to simulate multiple fracture propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs. The model can calculate partitioning of fluid between multiple fractures, fracture interaction within a stage and between stages, as well as the interaction between hydraulic and natural fractures. For simultaneous multiple fracture propagation, the exterior fractures generally take the majority of fluid and propagate at the expense of the interior fractures. Natural fractures can retard the growth of hydraulic fractures and change the fluid distribution between fractures and propagation trajectories of hydraulic fractures. In a reservoir with a heterogeneous natural fracture distribution, the interruption of natural fractures can complicate fracture geometry. The higher density or smaller spacing of natural fractures can mitigate stress shadow effects and favor more fluid flowing into the inner fractures. Due to the uncertainty of natural fracture distribution, the reliability of the complex fracture geometry provided by numerical models has been challenged. This paper demonstrates the potential of incorporating diagnostic results to constrain numerical results. Through combining diagnostic results with the fracture model, the accuracy of predicted fracture geometry can be improved.

Keywords

Hydraulic fracture Multi-stage fracturing Natural fractures Shale rocks Displacement discontinuity method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51804334) and the Science Foundation of Sinopec Group (Grant Numbers P16058, G5800- 17-ZS-KJB006).

References

  1. Barree RD, Fisher MK, Woodroof RA (2002) A practical guide to hydraulic fracture diagnostic technologies. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, TX, SPE Paper 77442:12.  https://doi.org/10.2118/77442-MS
  2. Blanton TL (1986) Propagation of hydraulically and dynamically induced fractures in naturally fractured reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the unconventional gas technology symposium of the Society of Petroleum Engineering, Louisville, KY, SPE Paper 15261:15.  https://doi.org/10.2118/15261-MS
  3. Castonguay Stephen T, Mear Mark E, Dean Rick H, Schmidt Joseph H (2013) Predictions of the growth of multiple interaction hydraulic fractures in three dimensions. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA, SPE Paper 166259:12.  https://doi.org/10.2118/166259-MS
  4. Cipolla CL, Warpinski NR, Mayerhofer MJ (2008) Hydraulic fracture complexity: diagnosis, remediation, and exploitation. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers Asia Pacific oil & gas conference and exhibition, Perth, Australia, SPE Paper 115771:24.  https://doi.org/10.2118/115771-MS
  5. Chipperfield ST, Wong JR, Warner DS, Cipolla CL, Mayerhofer MJ, Lolon EP, Warpinski NR (2007) Shear dilation diagnostics: a new approach for evaluating tight gas stimulation treatments. In: SPE 106289. SPE Hydraulic Fracture Technology Conference. College Station, TX, USA, 29–31 JanGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai C, Liu H, Wang Y, Li X, Wang W (2018) A simulation approach for shale gas development in China with embedded discrete fracture modeling. Mar Pet Geol (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Dahi-Taleghani A, Olson JE (2011) Numerical modeling of multistranded hydraulic fracture propagation: accounting for the interaction between induced and natural fractures. SPE J 16:575–581.  https://doi.org/10.2118/124884-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desroches J, Lecampion B, Ramakrishnan H et al (2014) Benefits of controlled hydraulic fracture placement: theory and field experiment. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers unconventional resources conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, SPE Paper 171667:14  https://doi.org/10.2118/171667-MS
  9. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under loading and transverse shear. J Fluids Eng 85:519–527Google Scholar
  10. Engelder T, Lash GG, Uzcategui RS (2009) Joint sets that ehance production from middle and upper Devonian gas shales of the Appalachian Basin. AAPG Bull 93(7):857–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gale JFW, Reed RM, Holder J (2007) Natural fractures in the Barnett shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments. AAPG Bull 91:603–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gale JFW, Laubach SE, Olson JE, Eichhubl P, Fall A (2014) Natural fractures in shale: a review and new observations. AAPG Bull 98(11):2165–2216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Teijeiro X, Rodriguez-Herrera A (2014) Dependence of stress-induced micro-seismicity on natural fracture properties and in-situ stress. In: Proceedings of The Unconventional Resources Conference-Canada, AB, Canada, SPE Paper 171632:12.  https://doi.org/10.2118/171632-MS
  14. Gu H, Weng X (2010) Criterion for fractures crossing frictional interfaces at non-orthogonal angles. In: Proceedings of the 44th US rock mechanics symposium and 5th U.S.-Canada Rock mechanics symposium, Salt Lake City, Utah, ARMA 10-198:6Google Scholar
  15. Holley EH, Zimmer U, Samson E (2010) Integrated analysis combining microseismic mapping and fiber-optic distributed temperature sensing (DTS). In: Proceedings of the Canadian unconventional resources and international petroleum conference held in Calgary, AB, Canada, CSUG/SPE Paper 136565:14.  https://doi.org/10.2118/136565-MS
  16. Inigo JF, Laubach SE, Hooker JN (2012) Fracture abundance and patterns in the Subandean fold and thrust belt, Devonian Huamampampa formation petroleum reservoirs and outcrops, Argentina and Bolivia. Mar Pet Geol 35:201–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffrey RG, Bunger AP, Lecampion B, Zhang X, Chen ZR et al (2009) Measuring hydraulic fracture growth in naturally fractured rock. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition, New Orleans, LA, USA, SPE Paper 124919:19.  https://doi.org/10.2118/124919-MS
  18. Kresse O, Weng X, Gu H, Wu R (2013) Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracture interaction in complex naturally fractured formations. Rock Mech Rock Eng 46:555–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lecampion B, Desroches J, Weng X et al (2015) Can we engineer better multistage horizontal completions? Evidence of the importance of near-wellbore fracture geometry from theory, lab and field experiments. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technology conference held in The Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 173363:19.  https://doi.org/10.2118/173363-MS
  20. McClure MW (2012) Modeling and characterization of hydraulic stimulation and induced seismicity in geothermal and shale gas reservoirs. Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer BR, Bazan LW (2011) A discrete fracture network model for hydraulically induced fractures: theory, parametric and case studies. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technology conference and exhibition, Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 140514:36.  https://doi.org/10.2118/140514-MS
  22. Medlin WL, Fitch JL (1988) Abnormal treating pressures in massive hydraulic fracturing treatments. J Pet Technol 40:633–642.  https://doi.org/10.2118/12108-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nagel N, Gil I, Sanchez-Nagel M, Damjanac B (2011) Simulating hydraulic fracturing in real fractured rock—overcoming the limits of pseudo3d models. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technology conference and exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 140480:15.  https://doi.org/10.2118/140480-MS
  24. Olson JE, Dahi-Taleghani A (2009) Modeling simultaneous growth of multiple hydraulic fractures and their interaction with natural fractures. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 119739:7.  https://doi.org/10.2118/119739-MS
  25. Olson JE, Wu K (2012) Sequential versus simultaneous multi-zone fracturing in horizontal wells: insights from a non-planar. In: Multi-frac numerical model: proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technology conference in The Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 152602:15.  https://doi.org/10.2118/152602-MS
  26. Peirce AP, Bunger AP (2015) Interference fracturing: non-uniform distributions of perforation clusters that promote simultaneous growth of multiple hydraulic fractures. SPE J 20:384–395.  https://doi.org/10.2118/172500-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Renshaw CE, Pollard DD (1995) An experimentally verified criterion for propagation across unbounded frictional interfaces in brittle, linear elastic materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Warpinski NR (1994) Interpretation of hydraulic fracture mapping experiments. In: Proceedings of the University of Tulsa Centennial petroleum engineering symposium field in Tulsa, OK, USA, 29–31 August. SPE 27985:14.  https://doi.org/10.2118/168603-MS
  29. Warpinski NR, Wolhart SL, Wright CA (2001) Analysis and prediction of microseismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference and exhibition held in New Orleans, LA, SPE Paper 71649:13.  https://doi.org/10.2118/71649-MS
  30. Warpinski NR, Mayerhofer MJ, Agarwal K (2013) Hydraulic-fracture geomechanics and microseismic-source mechanisms. SPE J 18:766–780.  https://doi.org/10.2118/158935-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Warpinski NR (2014) A review of hydraulic-fracture induced microseismicity. In: Proceedings of the 48th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium held in Minneapolis, MN, USA, ARMA 14-7774:12Google Scholar
  32. Webster PS, Cox BE, Molenaar MM (2013) Developments in diagnostic tools for hydraulic fracture geometry analysis. In: Proceedings of the unconventional resources technology conference, Denver, CO, USA, SPE Paper 168933:7.  https://doi.org/10.1190/URTEC2013-025
  33. Weng X, Kresse O, Cohen C, Wu R, Gu H (2011) Modeling of hydraulic fracture network propagation in a naturally fractured formation. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracturing technical conference and exhibition, The Woodlands, TX, USA, SPE Paper 140253:18.  https://doi.org/10.2118/140253-MS
  34. Weng X, Sesetty V, Kresse O (2015) Investigation of shear-induced permeability in unconventional reservoirs. In: 49th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, San Francisco, CA, USA, 28 June–1 JulyGoogle Scholar
  35. Wong S, Geilikman M, Xu Guanshui (2013) Interaction of multiple hydraulic fractures in horizontal wells. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers Middle East unconventional gas conference and exhibition, Muscat, Oman, SPE Paper 163982:10.  https://doi.org/10.2118/163982-MS
  36. Wu K (2014) Numerical modeling of complex hydraulic fracture development in unconventional reservoirs. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  37. Wu K, Olson JE (2015a) Simultaneous multi-frac treatments: fully coupled fluid flow and fracture mechanics for horizontal wells. SPE J 20:337–346.  https://doi.org/10.2118/167626-PA CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wu K, Olson JE (2015b) A simplified three-dimensional displacement discontinuity method for multiple fracture simulations. Int J Fract 193:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu K, Olson JE (2016) Mechanisms of simultaneous hydraulic-fracture propagation from multiple perforation clusters in horizontal wells. SPE J 21:1000–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wu R, Kresse O, Weng X, Cohen C, Gu H (2012) Modeling of interaction of hydraulic fractures in complex fracture networks. In: Proceedings of Society of Petroleum Engineers hydraulic fracture technology conference, TX, USA, SPE Paper 152052:14.  https://doi.org/10.2118/152052-MS

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective DevelopmentSINOPEC GroupBeijingChina
  2. 2.Sinopec Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production TechnologySINOPEC GroupBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of Petroleum EngineeringTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  4. 4.Department of Petroleum and Geosystems EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations