International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 215, Issue 1–2, pp 77–89 | Cite as

Finite strain theory of a Mode III crack in a rate dependent gel consisting of chemical and physical cross-links

  • Chung Yuen HuiEmail author
  • Jingyi Guo
  • Mincong Liu
  • Alan Zehnder
Original Paper


In previous works we developed a three-dimensional large deformation constitutive theory for a dual cross-link hydrogel gel with permanent and transient bonds. This theory connects the breaking and reforming kinetics of the transient bonds to the nonlinear elasticity of the gel network. We have shown that this theory agrees well with experimental data from both tension and torsion tests. Here we study the mechanics of a Mode III or anti-plane shear crack for this particular class of rate dependent solids. We first show that our constitutive model admits a non-trivial state of anti-plane shear deformation. We then establish a correspondence principle for the special case where the chains in the network obey Gaussian statistics. For this special case there is a one to one analogy between our model and standard linear viscoelasticity. We also study the asymptotic behavior of the time dependent crack tip field, and show that for a wide class of network energy density functions, the spatial singularities of these fields are identical to a hyper-elastic, cracked body with the same but undamaged networks.


Self-healing hydrogel Mode III crack Asymptotics Rate dependence Correspondence principle 



The authors acknowledge support by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CMMI -1537087.


  1. Brown HR (2007) A model of the fracture of double network gels. Macromolecules 40:3815–3818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chitaley AD, McClintock FA (1971) Elastic-plastic mechanics of steady crack growth under anti-plane shear. J Mech Phys Solids 19:147–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cotterell B, Rice JR (1980) Slightly curved or kinked cracks. Int J Fract 16:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gong JP (2010) Why are double network hydrogels so tough? Soft Matter 6:2583–2590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gong JP, Katsuyama Y, Kurokawa T, Osada Y (2003) Double-network hydrogels with extremely high mechanical strength. Adv Mater 15:1155–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo J, Long R, Mayumi K, Hui C-Y (2016) Mechanics of a dual cross-link gel with dynamic bonds: steady state kinetics and large deformation effects. Macromolecules 49:3497–3507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo J, Liu M, Zehnder AT, Zhao J, Narita T, Creton C, Hui C-Y (2018) Fracture mechanics of a self-healing hydrogel with covalent and physical crosslinks: a numerical study. J Mech Phys Solids 120:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Henderson KJ, Zhou TC, Otim KJ, Shull KR (2010) Ionically cross-linked triblock copolymer hydrogels with high strength. Macromolecules 43:6193–6201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hui CY, Riedel H (1981) The asymptotic stress and strain field near the tip of a growing crack under creep conditions. Int J Fract 17:409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ihsan AB, Sun TL, Kurokawa T, Karobi SN, Nakajima T, Nonoyama T, Roy CK, Luo F, Gong JP (2016) Self-healing behaviors of tough polyampholyte hydrogels. Macromolecules 49:4245–4252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knowles JK (1977) The finite anti-plane shear field near the tip of a crack for a class of incompressible elastic solids. Int J Fract 13:611–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kress R (2014) Linear integral equations. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuo CK, Ma PX (2001) Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 22:511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kwon HJ, Yasuda K, Gong JP, Ohmiya Y (2014) Polyelectrolyte hydrogels for replacement and regeneration of biological tissues. Macromol Res 22:227–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2001) Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101:1869–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin W-C, Fan W, Marcellan A, Hourdet D, Creton C (2010) Large strain and fracture properties of poly(dimethylacrylamide)/silica hybrid hydrogels. Macromolecules 43:2554–2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Long R, Hui C-Y (2015) Crack tip fields in soft elastic solids subjected to large quasi-static deformation—a review. Extreme Mech Lett 4:131–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Long R, Mayumi K, Creton C, Narita T, Hui C-Y (2014) Time dependent behavior of a dual cross-link self-healing gel: theory and experiments. Macromolecules 47:7243–7250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Long R, Mayumi K, Creton C, Narita T, Hui C-Y (2015) Rheology of a dual crosslink self-healing gel: theory and measurement using parallel-plate torsional rheometry. J Rheol 59:643–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mayumi K, Marcellan A, Ducouret G, Creton C, Narita T (2013) Stress–strain relationship of highly stretchable dual cross-link gels: separability of strain and time effect. ACS Macro Lett 2:1065–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayumi K, Guo J, Narita T, Hui CY, Creton C (2016) Fracture of dual crosslink gels with permanent and transient crosslinks. Extreme Mech Lett 6:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nakajima T, Kurokawa T, Ahmed S, Wu W, Gong JP (2013) Characterization of internal fracture process of double network hydrogels under uniaxial elongation. Soft Matter 9:1955–1966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Narita T, Mayumi K, Ducouret G, Hébraud P (2013) Viscoelastic properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels having permanent and transient cross-links studied by microrheology, classical rheometry, and dynamic light scattering. Macromolecules 46:4174–4183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qiu Y, Park K (2001) Environment-sensitive hydrogels for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 53:321–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rice J (1967) Stresses due to a sharp notch in a work-hardening elastic–plastic material loaded by longitudinal shear. J Appl Mech 34:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sun J-Y, Zhao X, Illeperuma WRK, Chaudhuri O, Oh KH, Mooney DJ, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z (2012) Highly stretchable and tough hydrogels. Nature 489:133–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun TL, Kurokawa T, Kuroda S, Ihsan AB, Akasaki T, Sato K, Haque MA, Nakajima T, Gong JP (2013) Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity. Nat Mater 12:932–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang X, Hong W (2011) Pseudo-elasticity of a double network gel. Soft Matter 7:8576–8581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Webber RE, Creton C, Brown HR, Gong JP (2007) Large strain hysteresis and Mullins effect of tough double-network hydrogels. Macromolecules 40:2919–2927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zehnder AT (2012) Fracture mechanics. Springer, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Field of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations