Confessions of a (Cheap) Sophisticated Substantivalist
- 19 Downloads
I illustrate a challenge to a view that is a response to the Hole Argument. The view, sophisticated substantivalism, has been claimed to be the received view. While sophisticated substantivalism has many defenders, there is a fundamental tension in the view that has not received the attention it deserves. Anyone who defends or endorses sophisticated substantivalism, should acknowledge this challenge, and should either show why it is not serious or explain how to respond to it.
KeywordsHole argument Substantivalism Relationalism Determinism
I’d like to thank Gordon Belot, Laura Ruetsche, Jim Weatherall, and Frank Arntzenius for helpful discussions on these issues, and thank audiences at UCLA and University of Bristol for helpful comments on talks from which this paper is derived.
- 2.Brighouse, C.: Spacetime and holes. In: PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 1, pp. 117–125). Philosophy of Science Association (1994)Google Scholar
- 3.Maidens, A.: World enough and space–time: absolute versus relational theories of space and time (1992)Google Scholar
- 5.Pooley, O.: Relationist and substantivalist approaches to spacetime. In: Batterman, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, pp. 522–586. Oxford University Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
- 7.Hoefer, C., Cartright, N.: Substantivalism and the hole argument. In: Earman, J., Janis, A., Massey, G.J., Resche, N. (eds.) Philosophical Problems of the Internal and External Worlds, pp. 23–43. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh (1994)Google Scholar
- 17.Skow, B.: Haecceitism, anti-haecceitism and possible worlds. The Philosophical Quarterly 58(230), 98–107 (2008)Google Scholar
- 21.Norton, J. D: The hole argument. In: Zalta, E. N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2011 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/spacetime-holearg/
- 22.Friedman, M.: Foundations of Space–Time theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1983)Google Scholar
- 23.Sklar, L.: Space, Time, and Spacetime, vol. 164. University of California Press, California (1977)Google Scholar
- 25.Armstrong, D.M.: Universals. An Opinionated Introduction. West-view, London, Boulder (Colorado) (1989)Google Scholar