Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 48, Issue 11, pp 1617–1647 | Cite as

How Problematic is the Near-Euclidean Spatial Geometry of the Large-Scale Universe?

  • M. Holman
Article
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

Modern observations based on general relativity indicate that the spatial geometry of the expanding, large-scale Universe is very nearly Euclidean. This basic empirical fact is at the core of the so-called “flatness problem”, which is widely perceived to be a major outstanding problem of modern cosmology and as such forms one of the prime motivations behind inflationary models. An inspection of the literature and some further critical reflection however quickly reveals that the typical formulation of this putative problem is fraught with questionable arguments and misconceptions and that it is moreover imperative to distinguish between different varieties of problem. It is shown that the observational fact that the large-scale Universe is so nearly flat is ultimately no more puzzling than similar “anthropic coincidences”, such as the specific (orders of magnitude of the) values of the gravitational and electromagnetic coupling constants. In particular, there is no fine-tuning problem in connection to flatness of the kind usually argued for. The arguments regarding flatness and particle horizons typically found in cosmological discourses in fact address a mere single issue underlying the standard FLRW cosmologies, namely the extreme improbability of these models with respect to any “reasonable measure” on the “space of all spacetimes”. This issue may be expressed in different ways and a phase space formulation, due to Penrose, is presented here. A horizon problem only arises when additional assumptions—which are usually kept implicit and at any rate seem rather speculative—are made.

Keywords

Cosmological flatness problem General relativity FLRW solutions Initial conditions Fine-tuning Inflation Horizon problem Second law of thermodynamics Quantum gravity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication was made possible through the support of a Grant from the John Templeton Foundation. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. I thank the organizers of the Fourth International Conference on the Nature and Ontology of Spacetime, in Varna, Bulgaria, for providing an opportunity for me to present (most of) this work. Financial support from Stichting FOM (Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter) in the Netherlands to attend the Conference is also gratefully acknowledged. Finally, I thank Andy Albrecht, Feraz Azhar, George Ellis, David Garfinkle and especially Phillip Helbig and Chris Smeenk for comments and/or discussions pertaining to the contents of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Hume, D.: An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (1748), reprinted in Classics of Western Philosophy, Cahn, S.M. (ed.), (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2012, Eighth Edition)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Euclid: The elements (300 B.C.), reprinted as The Thirteen Books of the Elements, Heath, T.L. (Transl.), (Mineola: Dover Publications, Inc., 2002, Second Edition Unabridged)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riemann, G.F.B.: Über die Hypothesen, Welche der Geometrie Zugrunde Liegen. Göttingen Inaugural Lecture (1854)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Einstein, A.: Zur elektrodynamik bewegter körper. Annalen der Physik 17, 891–921 (1905)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Einstein, A.: Die feldgleichungen der gravitation. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Sitzber., pp. 844–847 (1915)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ade, P.A.R. et al.: Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594:A13, Planck Collaboration (2016) arXiv:1502.01589
  7. 7.
    Einstein, A.: Kosmologische betrachtungen zur allgemeinen relativitätstheorie. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin Sitzber., pp. 142–152 (1917)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedmann, A.: Über die krümmung des raumes. Z. Phys. 10, 377–386 (1922)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lemaître, G.: Un Univers Homogène de Masse Constante et de Rayon Croissant Rendant Compte de la Vitesse Radiale des Nébuleuses Extragalactiques. Ann. de la Soc. Sci. de Brux. A47, 49–59 (1927)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hubble, E.: A relation between distance and radial velocity among extragalactic nebulae. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 15, 169–173 (1929)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ade, P.A.R. et al.: Planck 2015 Results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594:A16, Planck Collaboration (2016) arXiv:1506.07135
  12. 12.
    Wu, K.K.S., Lahav, O., Rees, M.J.: The large-scale smoothness of the Universe. Nature 397, 225–230 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Longair, M.S.: Observational cosmology. Rep. Prog. Phys. 34, 1125–1248 (1971)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hogg, D.W., et al.: Cosmic homogeneity demonstrated with luminous red galaxies. Astrophys. J. 624, 54–58 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0411197 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarkar, P., Yadav, J., Pandey, B., Bharadwaj, S.: The scale of homogeneity of the galaxy distribution in SDSS DR6. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 399, L128–L131 (2009). arXiv:0906.3431 [astro-ph]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hawking, S.W., Ellis, G.F.R.: The Large Scale Structure of Spacetime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Uzan, J.P., Clarkson, C., Ellis, G.F.R.: Time drift of cosmological redshifts as a test of the Copernican principle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 191303 (2008). arXiv:0801.0068 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clifton, T., Clarkson, C., Bull, P.: The isotropic blackbody CMB as evidence for a homogeneous universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 051303 (2012). arXiv:1111.3794 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wald, R.M.: General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rindler, W.: Relativity: Special, General and Cosmological. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robertson, H.P.: Kinematics and world structure. I. Astrophys. J. 82, 284–301 (1935)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walker, A.G.: On Milne’s theory of world-structure. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 42, 90–127 (1936)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stabell, R., Refsdal, S.: Classification of general relativistic world models. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 132, 379–388 (1966)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wainwright, J., Ellis, G.F.R. (eds.): Dynamical Systems in Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uzan, J.-P., Lehoucq, R.: A dynamical study of the Friedmann equations. Eur. J. Phys. 22, 371–384 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dicke, R .H., Peebles, P.J .E.: The Big Bang Cosmology—Enigmas and Nostrums. In: Hawking, S .W., Israel, W. (eds.) General Relativity. An Einstein Centenary Survey, Chap. 9, pp. 504–517. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guth, A.H.: Inflationary universe: a possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems. Phys. Rev. D23(2), 347–356 (1981)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Linde, A.D.: A new inflationary universe scenario: a possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems. Phys. Lett. 108B, 389–393 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Albrecht, A., Steinhardt, P.J.: Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1220–1223 (1982)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Guth, A.H.: Time Since the Beginning, vol. 245. ASP Conf. Ser., pp. 3–17 (2001) arXiv:astro-ph/0301199
  31. 31.
    Guth, A.H.: Inflation. In: W.L. Freeman (ed.) Measuring and Modeling the Universe, vol. 2 , pp. 31–52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0404546
  32. 32.
    Linde, A.D.: Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology (Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers), (1990) also available online. arXiv:hep-th/0503203
  33. 33.
    Ryden, B.: Introduction to Cosmology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baumann, D.: Lectures on inflation. In: Csabi, C., Dodelson, S. (eds.) Physics of the Large and the Small. Conf. Proc. TASI Elementary Particle Physics 2009, pp. 523–686. World Scientific, Singapore (2011) arXiv:0907.5424
  35. 35.
    Hawley, J.F., Holcomb, K.A.: Foundations of Modern Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Coles, P., Ellis, G.F.R.: Is the Universe Open or Closed? The Density of Matter in the Universe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kirchner, U., Ellis, G.F.R.: A probability measure for FLRW models. Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 1199–1213 (2003)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Adler, R.J., Overduin, J.M.: The nearly flat Universe. Gen. Relat. Gravit. 37, 1491–1503 (2005). arXiv:gr-qc/0501061 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lake, K.: The flatness problem and \(\Lambda \). Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 201102 (2005). arXiv:astro-ph/0404319 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Helbig, P.: Is there a flatness problem in classical cosmology? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 561–569 (2012). arXiv:1112.1666 ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Helbig, P.: Is there a flatness problem in classical cosmology? In: Bičák, J., Ledvinka, T. (eds.) Relativity and Gravitation–100 Years After Einstein in Prague, pp. 355–361. Springer, Cham (2014)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Carroll, S.M.: In what sense is the early Universe fine-tuned? (2014) arXiv:1406.3057 [astro-ph.CO]
  43. 43.
    Evrard, G., Coles, P.: Getting the measure of the flatness problem. Class. Quant. Grav. 12, L93–L97 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Misner, C.W.: Mixmaster universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 1071–1074 (1969)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weinberg, S.: Cosmology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Smeenk, C.: Philosophy of cosmology. In: Batterman, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, pp. 607–652. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smeenk, C., Ellis, G.: Philosophy of cosmology. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2017)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Spergel, D.N., et al.: First year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations : determination of cosmological parameters. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 148, 175–194 (2003). arXiv:astro-ph/0302209 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Riess, A.G., et al.: Type Ia supernova discoveries at \(z>1\) from the Hubble Space Telescope: evidence for past deceleration and constraints on dark energy evolution. Astrophys. J. 607, 665–687 (2004). arXiv:astro-ph/0402512 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Witzemann, A., et al.: Model-independent curvature determination with 21 cm intensity mapping experiments. MNRAS Lett. 477, L122–L127 (2018). arXiv:astro-ph/1711.02179 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lake, K.: Integration of the Friedmann equation for universes of arbitrary complexity. Phys. Rev. D74, 123505 (2006). arXiv:gr-qc/0603028 ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Carr, B .J.: The anthropic principle revisited. In: Carr, B .J. (ed.) Universe or Multiverse, pp. 77–89. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Penrose, R.: The Road to Reality. Jonathan Cape, London (2004)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ehlers, J., Rindler, W.: A phase-space representation of Friedmann-Lemaître universes containing both dust and radiation and the inevitability of a big bang. Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 238, 503–521 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hawking, S.W., Penrose, R.: The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A314, 529–548 (1970)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Joshi, P.S.: On the genericity of spacetime singularities. Pramana-J. Phys. 69, 119–136 (2007). arXiv:gr-qc/0702116 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ellis, G.F .R.: Issues in the philosophy of cosmology. In: Earman, J., Butterfield, J. (eds.) Philosophy of Physics (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science), pp. 1183–1286. Elsevier, North Holland (2007). arXiv:astro-ph/0602280 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Holman, M.: Electroweak symmetry breaking, intermediate regulators and physics beyond the standard model (2015) arXiv:1507.08214 [hep-ph]
  59. 59.
    Penrose, R.: Singularities and time-asymmetry. In: Hawking, S., Israel, W. (eds.) General Relativity, an Einstein Centenary Survey. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1979)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Penrose, R.: Time-asymmetry and quantum gravity. In: Isham, C .J., Penrose, R., Sciama, D .W. (eds.) Quantum Gravity 2, pp. 244–272. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1981)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Feynman, R .P.: The Character of Physical Law. MIT Press, Cambridge (1967)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wald, R.M.: The arrow of time and the initial conditions of the Universe. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 37, 394–398 (2006). arXiv:gr-qc/0507094 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Holman, M.: Foundations of quantum gravity : the role of principles grounded in empirical reality. Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 46, 142–153 (2014). arXiv:1308.5097 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Belinskiĭ, V.A., Khalatnikov, I.M., Lifshitz, E.M.: Oscillatory approach to a singular point in the relativistic cosmology. Adv. Phys. 19, 525–573 (1970)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Uggla, C., van Elst, H., Wainwright, J., Ellis, G.F.R.: Past attractor in inhomogeneous cosmology. Phys. Rev. D68, 103502 (2003). arXiv:gr-qc/0304002 ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Berger, B.: Singularities in cosmological spacetimes. In: Ashtekar, A., Petkov, V. (eds.) Springer Handbook of Spacetime, pp. 437–460. Springer, Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Collins, C.B., Hawking, S.W.: Why is the Universe isotropic? Astrophys. J. 180, 317–334 (1973)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wainwright, J., Coley, A.A., Ellis, G.F.R., Hancock, M.: On the isotropy of the Universe: do Bianchi \(\text{ VII }_h\) cosmologies isotropize? Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 331–350 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wald, R.M.: Correlations beyond the horizon. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 24, 1111–1116 (1992)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Preskill, J.P.: Cosmological production of superheavy magnetic monopoles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1365–1368 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Steinhardt, P.J., Turner, M.S.: Prescription for successful new inflation. Phys. Rev. D62, 2162–2172 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Rothman, T., Ellis, G.F.R.: Can inflation occur in anisotropic cosmologies ? Phys. Lett. B180, 19–24 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Raychaudhuri, A.K., Modak, B.: Cosmological inflation with arbitrary initial conditions. Class. Quant. Grav. 5, 225–232 (1988)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Madsen, M.S., Ellis, G.F.R.: The evolution of \(\Omega \) in inflationary universes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 234, 67–77 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Penrose, R.: Difficulties with inflationary cosmology. In: Fenyves, E. (ed.) Fourteenth Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, pp. 249–264. New York Academy of Sciences, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Linde, A.D.: Chaotic inflation. Phys. Lett. 129B, 177–181 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Rees, M.J.: Origin of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation in a chaotic universe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 1669–1671 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Hu, B.L., O’Connor, D.J.: Mixmaster inflation. Phys. Rev. D34, 2535–2538 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Futamase, T., Rothman, T., Matzner, R.: Behavior of chaotic inflation in anisotropic cosmologies with nonminimal coupling. Phys. Rev. D39, 405–411 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Albrecht, A.: Cosmic inflation and the arrow of time. In: Barrow, J.D. (ed.) Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology and Complexity, pp. 363–401. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004). arXiv:astro-ph/0210527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Wald, R.M.: Asymptotic behaviour of homogeneous cosmological models in the presence of a positive cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D28, 2118–2120 (1983)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Barrow, J.D.: The deflationary universe: an instability of the de sitter universe. Phys. Lett. B180, 335–339 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Padmanabhan, T.: Advanced topics in cosmology: a pedagogical introduction. AIP Conf. Proc. 843, 111–166 (2006). arXiv:astro-ph/0602117 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Guth, A.: Eternal inflation and its implications. J. Phys. A40, 6811–6826 (2007). arXiv:hep-th/0702178 ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Hollands, S., Wald, R.M.: An alternative to inflation. Gen. Relativ. Grav. 34, 2043–2055 (2002). arXiv:gr-qc/0205058 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P.J., Loeb, A.: Pop Goes the Universe. Scientific American, pp. 32–39 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Ijjas, A., Steinhardt, P.J., Loeb, A.: Inflationary paradigm in trouble after Planck 2013. Phys. Lett. B723, 261–266 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Hollands, S., Wald, R.M.: Quantum field theory is not merely quantum mechanics applied to low energy effective degrees of freedom. Gen. Relativ. Grav. 36, 2595–2603 (2004). arXiv:gr-qc/0405082 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Wald, R.M.: Quantum gravity and time irreversibility. Phys. Rev. D21(10), 2742–2755 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rotman Institute of PhilosophyWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations