Advertisement

Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 493–527 | Cite as

A procedure for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy preference relations

  • Jie Tang
  • Fanyong MengEmail author
  • Francisco Javier Cabrerizo
  • Enrique Herrera-ViedmaEmail author
Article

Abstract

To express the uncertain preferred and non-preferred qualitative judgments of decision makers, interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy sets (IVILFSs) are proposed in a similar way as Atanassov and Gargov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Considering the application of IVILFSs, the concept of interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy variables (IVILFVs) is defined and a ranking order is offered. Then, we introduce interval-valued intuitionistic linguistic fuzzy preference relations (IVILFPRs) whose elements are IVILFVs. Furthermore, an additive consistency concept is presented and a model for judging the consistency of IVILFPRs is built. Meanwhile, optimization models for deriving additively consistent IVILFPRs and for determining missing linguistic variables in incomplete IVILFPRs are constructed, respectively. For group decision making, optimization models for determining the weights of the decision makers and for improving the consensus level are established, respectively. A procedure for group decision making with IVILFPRs is developed that can cope with inconsistent and incomplete IVILFPRs. Finally, a practical group decision-making problem about evaluating express companies is selected to show the application of the new results.

Keywords

Decision making IVILFPR Consistency Consensus Optimization model 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Grant from the FEDER funds provided by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (No. TIN2016-75850-R), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71571192, and 71671188), the Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University (No. 2018CX039), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (No. 2018zzts094), the Major Project for National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 91846301, 71790615), and the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (No. 71431006).

References

  1. Atanassov, K. T. (1986). Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87–96.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atanassov, K. T., & Gargov, G. (1989). Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 31, 343–349.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beliakov, G., James, S., & Wilkin, T. (2017). Aggregation and consensus for preference relations based on fuzzy partial orders. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16, 409–428.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabrerizo, F. J., Al-Hmouz, R., Morfeq, A., Balamash, A. S., Martínez, M. A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Soft consensus measures in group decision making using unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Soft Computing, 21, 3037–3050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, Z. C., Liu, P. H., & Pei, Z. (2015). An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 8, 747–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goyal, R. K., & Kaushal, S. (2018). Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17, 195–209.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996). A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78, 73–87.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, W., Dong, Y. C., Chiclana, F., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Group decision-making based on heterogeneous preference relations with self-confidence. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 16, 429–447.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Meng, F. Y., & Chen, X. H. (2018). A robust additive consistency-based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 17, 49–73.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meng, F. Y., Tang, J., Wang, P., & Chen, X. H. (2018). A programming-based algorithm for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 144, 122–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meng, F. Y., Tang, J., & Xu, Z. S. (2017a). A 0-1 mixed programming model based method for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 112, 289–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Meng, F. Y., Tang, J., & Xu, Z. S. (2017b). Exploiting the priority weights from interval linguistic fuzzy preference relations. Soft Computing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2878-y.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Park, J. H., Gwak, M. G., & Kwun, Y. C. (2011). Uncertain linguistic harmonic mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute group decision making. Computing, 93, 47–64.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tang, J., Meng, F., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency analysis. Information Sciences, 467, 115–134.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tapia García, J. M., del Moral, M. J., Martinez, M. A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2012). A consensus model for group decision making problems with linguistic interval fuzzy preference relations. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 10022–10030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Xu, Z. S. (2004a). EOWA and EOWG operators for aggregating linguistic labels based on linguistic preference relations. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 12, 791–810.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu, Z. S. (2004b). Uncertain linguistic aggregation operators based approach to multiple attribute group decision making under uncertain linguistic environment. Information Sciences, 168, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu, Z. S. (2006). An approach based on the uncertain LOWG and induced uncertain LOWG operators to group decision making with uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Decision Support Systems, 41, 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Xu, Z. S. (2007a). Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Information Sciences, 177, 2363–2379.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu, Z. S. (2007b). A survey of preference relations. International Journal of General Systems, 36, 179–203.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Xu, Z. S. (2010). An integrated model-based interactive approach to FMAGDM with incomplete preference information. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 9, 333–357.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning–Part I. Information Sciences, 8, 199–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zeng, S. Z., Merigo, J. M., & Su, W. H. (2013). The uncertain probabilistic OWA distance operator and its application in group decision making. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37, 6266–6275.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhou, L. G., He, Y. D., Chen, H. Y., & Liu, J. P. (2014a). On compatibility of uncertain multiplicative linguistic preference relations based on the linguistic COWGA. Applied Intelligence, 40, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhou, L. G., Wu, J. X., & Chen, H. Y. (2014b). Linguistic continuous ordered weighted distance measure and its application to multiple attributes group decision making. Appl. Soft Computing, 25, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringKing Abdulaziz UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  4. 4.School of Management Science and EngineeringNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations