Advertisement

Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 443–446 | Cite as

Critical Theory of Digital Media

  • Ian AngusEmail author
Commentary
  • 512 Downloads

Abstract

Recalling the phenomenological and Hegelian bases of the critique of misplaced concreteness, and supplementing these by the contribution of Gregory Bateson, it is possible to say that a contemporary critique of digital media cannot appeal to an irrevocable concreteness nor finally defeat abstraction. Since the digital media complex is characterized by temporal decay, transversality, and singularity, a new departure for a critical theory of digital media must centre on the cultural unconscious (non-dominant translations) and the limit, or edge, of the cultural complex.

Keywords

Critical theory Phenomenology Digital media Cultural studies Bateson Technology studies 

References

  1. Angus, I. (1984). Technique and enlightenment: Limits of instrumental reason. Washington, DC: Centre for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America. https://www.academia.edu/720747/Technique_and_Enlightenment_Limits_of_Instrumental_Reason.
  2. Angus, I. (2000). Primal scenes of communication: Communication, consumerism, social movements. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Angus, I. (2005). Media, expression and a new politics: Eight theses. Media and Cultural Politics, 1(1), 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angus, I. (2009). Love the questions: University education and enlightenment. Winnipeg: Arbeiter Ring.Google Scholar
  5. Angus, I. (Forthcoming). The institution of digital culture. In R. Foshay (Ed.), Identity, agency, and the digital nexus. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HumanitiesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations