Advertisement

Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 385–394 | Cite as

ICT Literacy: An Imperative of the Twenty-First Century

  • Søren RiisEmail author
Article

Abstract

The entanglement of ethics and technology makes it necessary for us to understand and reflect upon our own practices and to question technological hypes. The information and communication technology (ICT) literacy required to navigate the twenty-first century has to do with recognizing our own human limitations, developing critical measures and acknowledging feelings of estrangement, puzzlement as well as sheer wonder of technology. ICT literacy is indeed all about visions of the good life and the art of living in the twenty-first century. The main focus of this paper is to explore and discuss ICT in relation to pupils and teachers and try to understand why and how these technologies are implemented in the school system. This focus not only allows us to better understand how concepts and habits with respect to ICT are shaped in numerous children, but teaches us to acquire an enhanced sensitivity with regard to ICT in the ‘classic’ literacy context of the educational system.

Keywords

Philosophy Education Teaching Learning Progress Risk 

References

  1. Bernasconi, M., et al. (2006). High-tech entrepreneurship: Managing innovation, variety and uncertainty. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Danish Board of Technology. (2011). Skoler og medier—it-understøttelse af læring. http://www.tekno.dk/pdf/projekter/p11_skole_og_medier/p11_Rapport_Skole_og_medier-it_understoettelse_af_laering.pdf
  3. Hasse. (2015). Indledning. In TEK-U Modellen: Teknologiforståelse i professionerne (pp. 9–26). Copenhagen: Narayana Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hasse, C., & Brok, L. S. (2015). TEK-U Modellen: Teknologiforståelse i professionerne.Google Scholar
  5. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ihde, D. (2010). Heidegger’s technologies: Postphenomenological perspectives. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Monday Morning. (2011). Nye lærerkompetencer er nøglen til den digitale folkeskole. MM09.Google Scholar
  8. Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Riis, S. (2008). Postphenomenology—“Festschrift” for Don Ihde. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 34(4), 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Riis, S. (2011). Towards the origin of modern technology: Reconfiguring Martin Heidegger’s thinking. Continental Philosophy Review, 44, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Søndergaard, D., & Hasse, C. (2012). Teknologiforståelse. Aarhus: Århus University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Strauss, V. (2014). Why a leading professor of new media just banned technology use in class. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/09/25/why-a-leading-professor-of-new-media-just-banned-technology-use-in-class/, September 2014.
  13. UNESCO. (2014a). http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/icts/, September 2014.
  14. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roskilde UniversityRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations