The Uses of Reason in Times of Technical Mediation
The art of living idiom suits well a practice-oriented approach in ethics of technology. But what remains or becomes of the functioning and use of reason in ethics? In reaction to the comments by Huijer this reply elaborates in more detail how Foucault’s art of living can be adapted for a critical contemporary ethics of technology. And the aesthetic-political rationality in Foucault’s ethics is compared with Wellner’s suggestions of holding on to the notion of code but with a new meaning. Foucault’s fourfold scheme of subjectivation and a distinction of “below and above reason” structure the argument.
KeywordsTechnical mediation Ethics Foucault Fourfold of subjectivation Uses of reason
- Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Dorrestijn, S. (2006). Michel Foucault et l’éthique des techniques: Le cas de la RFID (mémoire de DEA). Nanterre: Université de Paris X.Google Scholar
- Dorrestijn, S. (2012a). The design of our own lives: Technical mediation and subjectivation after Foucault. Enschede: University of Twente (Ph.D. thesis).Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1992). The use of Pleasure: The history of sexuality. Vol. 2. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2000). On the genealogy of Ethics. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics. Subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol I (pp. 253–280). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (2008). Introduction to Kant’s Anthropology (Nigro, R., trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
- Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.