Advertisement

Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 311–321 | Cite as

The Care of Our Hybrid Selves: Ethics in Times of Technical Mediation

  • Steven DorrestijnEmail author
Article

Abstract

What can the art of living after Foucault contribute to ethics in relation to the mediation of human existence by technology? To develop the relation between technical mediation and ethics, firstly the theme of technical mediation is elaborated in line with Foucault’s notion of ethical problematization. Every view of what technology does to us at the same time expresses an ethical concern about technology. The contemporary conception of technical mediation tends towards the acknowledgement of ongoing hybridization, not ultimately good or bad but ambivalent, which means for us the challenge of taking care of ourselves as hybrid beings. Secondly, the work of Foucault provides elements for imagining this care for our hybrid selves, notably his notions of freedom as a practice and of the care of the self. A conclusions about technical mediation and ethics is that whereas the approaches of the delegation of morality to technology by Latour and mediated morality by Verbeek see technical mediation of behavior and moral outlook as an answer in ethics, this should rather be considered the problem that ethics is about.

Keywords

Philosophy of technology Technical mediation Art of living Care of the self Michel Foucault 

References

  1. Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American philosophers of technology. In Idem, American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (pp. 1–10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Canguilhem, G. (1965). Machine et organisme. In Idem, La connaissance de la vie (2nd ed., pp. 101–127). Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  3. Chamayou, G. (2007). “Présentation”. In Kapp, E. (Ed.), Principes d’une philosophie de la technique (trans. G. Chamayou) (pp. 7–40). Paris: Vrin (Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Braunsweig: Westermann, 1877).Google Scholar
  4. Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  5. Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revised. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1990). The care of the self: The history of sexuality (Vol. 3). London: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  8. Foucault, M. (1992). The use of Pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. 2). London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (2000a). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics. Subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 19541984 (Vol. I, pp. 281–302). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (2000b). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics. Subjectivity and truth: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. I, pp. 303-319). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Habermas, J. (1987). Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Haraway, D. (1985). Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80, 65–108.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Huijer, M., & Smits, M. (Eds.). (2010). Moralicide: Nieuwe morele vocabulaires voor technologie. Kampen: Klement.Google Scholar
  15. Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Illies, C., & Meijers, A. (2009). Artefacts without agency. The Monist, 92(3), 420–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonas, H. (1984). The imperative of responsibility: In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kapp, E. (1877). Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Braunsweig: Westermann.Google Scholar
  19. Kapp, E. (2007). Principes d’une philosophie de la technique (trans. G. Chamayou). Paris: Vrin (Grundlinien einer Philosophie der Technik. Braunsweig: Westermann, 1877).Google Scholar
  20. Kockelkoren, P. (2003). Technology: Art, fairground, and theatre. Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: Creations of mind and matter. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Latour, B. (2013). An inquiry into modes of existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1970). The German ideology. Part one. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding media: The extensions of man (Critical edition by W. T. Gordon). Corte Madera, CA: Gingko Press.Google Scholar
  28. Selinger, E., et al. (2014). Confronting the moral dimensions of technology through mediation theory. Philosophy & Technology, 27(2), 287–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winner, L. (1993). Upon opening the black box and finding it empty: Social constructivism and the philosophy of technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(3), 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospitality Business SchoolSaxion University of Applied SciencesDeventerNetherlands

Personalised recommendations