Advertisement

Strategic capacity portfolio planning under demand uncertainty and technological change

  • Phuc Hong Nguyen
  • Kung-Jeng WangEmail author
Article
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

High-tech industries are experiencing accelerated technological change, which causes rapid obsolescence of invested manufacturing equipment. In such environment, the impact of the new technologies must be carefully considered while making decisions involved in resource acquisition or replacement. In this study, we consider a capacity planning problem with the presence of uncertain magnitude and timing of new technologies and stochastic demands. This study targets of determining (1) the most profitable technology portfolio investment, (2) the corresponding resource levels, and (3) the production plan to fully utilize the capacity. The research problem is modeled by Markov decision process (MDP). The objective is to maximize expected profit under demand and technology uncertainties. For solution efficiency, the Intlinprog solver is utilized to find the optimal action at each decision epoch, accompanying with a parallel computing mechanism to relax the computational burden of the MDP model. Through experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model, and highlight the importance of considering uncertain factors.

Keywords

Capacity planning Markov modeling Stochastic models Technology management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by Ministry of Science & Technology of the Republic of China (Taiwan) under the Grant # MOST 105-2221-E-011-106-MY2, 107-2221-E-011-101-MY3, and 107-2811-E-011-515.

References

  1. Badri H, Bashiri M, Hejazi TH (2013) Integrated strategic and tactical planning in a supply chain network design with a heuristic solution method. Comput Oper Res 40(4):1143–1154MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Bashyam TCA (1996) Competitive capacity expansion under demand uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 95(1):89–114CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Bean JC, Lohmann JR, Smith RL (1984) A dynamic infinite horizon replacement economy decision model. Eng Econ 30(2):99–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen TL, Lin JT, Wu CH (2014) Coordinated capacity planning in two-stage thin-film-transistor liquid-crystal-display (TFT-LCD) production networks. Omega Int J Manag Sci 42(1):141–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chien C-F, Wu C-H, Chiang Y-S (2012) Coordinated capacity migration and expansion planning for semiconductor manufacturing under demand uncertainties. Int J Prod Econ 135(2):860–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hartman JC, Rogers J (2006) Dynamic programming approaches for equipment replacement problems with continuous and discontinuous technological change. IMA J Manag Math 17(2):143–158MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Hopp WJ, Nair SK (1994) Markovian deterioration and technological change. IIE Trans 26(6):74–82.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07408179408966640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ITRS (2013) International technology roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS): executive summary by the International Roadmap Committee (IRC). Retrieved 05 Sept 2018, from http://www.itrs.net/Links/2013ITRS/Summaryx2013.htm
  9. Lin JT, Chen T-L, Chu H-C (2014) A stochastic dynamic programming approach for multi-site capacity planning in TFT-LCD manufacturing under demand uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ 148:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martínez-Costa C, Mas-Machuca M, Benedito E, Corominas A (2014) A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 153:66–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MatWorks (2018) Mixed-integer linear programming algorithms. Retrieved 05 Sept 2018, from https://ww2.mathworks.cn/help/optim/ug/mixed-integer-linear-programming-algorithms.html#btwyo05
  12. Mieghem JAV (2003) Commissioned paper: capacity management, investment, and hedging: review and recent developments. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 5(4):269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moore GE (2006) Cramming more components onto integrated circuits, reprinted from Electronics, volume 38, number 8, April 19, 1965, pp.114 ff. IEEE Solid-State Circuits Soc Newsl 11(5):33–35.  https://doi.org/10.1109/n-ssc.2006.4785860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nair S, Hopp W (1992) A model for equipment replacement due to technological obsolescence. Eur J Oper Res 63(2):207–221CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Puterman ML (1994) Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Rajagopalan S, Singh MR, Morton TE (1998) Capacity expansion and replacement in growing markets with uncertain technological breakthroughs. Manag Sci 44(1):12–30.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.12 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Sethi S, Chand S (1979) Planning horizon procedures for machine replacement models. Manag Sci 25(2):140–151MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapiro A (2001) Monte Carlo simulation approach to stochastic programming. Paper presented at the proceeding of the 2001 winter simulation conference (cat. no. 01CH37304)Google Scholar
  19. Wang K-J, Wang S-M (2013) Simultaneous resource portfolio planning under demand and technology uncertainty in the semiconductor testing industry. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(5):278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang KJ, Wee HM, Gao SF, Chung S-L (2005) Production and inventory control with chaotic demands. Omega Int J Manag Sci 33(2):97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang KJ, Wang SM, Yang SJ (2007a) A resource portfolio model for equipment investment and allocation of semiconductor testing industry. Eur J Oper Res 179(2):390–403CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang S-M, Chen J, Wang KJ (2007b) Resource portfolio planning of make-to-stock products using a constraint programming based genetic algorithm. Omega Int J Manag Sci 35(2):237–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu C-H, Chuang Y-T (2010) An innovative approach for strategic capacity portfolio planning under uncertainties. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):1002–1013MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial ManagementNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Industrial ManagementCan Tho UniversityCan ThoVietnam

Personalised recommendations