Enhanced Oil Spill Clean-Up Using Immersed Thermally Conductive Objects
A method for rapid burning of hazardous oil spills on water is investigated with the ultimate goal of designing a burner for faster clean-up of hazardous spills in offshore and other remote environments. A thermally conductive object, which comprises of a 0.25 cm thick copper porous mesh, with or without conical copper coils, is used. The influence of this object on the burning rate of an Alaska North Slope crude oil slick (1 cm thick) on saline water is studied. For the mesh-alone case, heat from flame is transferred to the mesh, which rapidly gets heated up and transmits the heat to the oil slick. This heat transfer is much higher than that in the baseline case. In the case with conical coils, which are engulfed in the flame, the heated up coils transfer the heat to the copper mesh more effectively. Thus, the object enhances the mass burning rate. Experimental results reveal that the copper mesh reaches a temperature higher than the boiling point of the oil, such that onset of nucleate boiling is possible. The mesh-coil system is able to burn thin slick of oil resting on water achieving an efficiency of ~ 400% above baseline. A simple integral model is also proposed to predict the temperature profiles in mesh, oil, and water layers. The predicted temperature profiles show good agreement with the experimental results. A parametric study using the integral model is also reported. The model can be used as a guideline to optimize the mesh porosity and thickness for different hazardous spill scenarios.
KeywordsOil spill clean-up Pool fire Thermally conductive objects Nucleate boiling Integral model
This study is funded by the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, US Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., under Contract Number E15PC00004. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the BSEE, nor does mention of the trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
- 1.Trannum HC, Bakke T (2012) Environmental effects of the deepwater horizon oil spill—focus on effects on fish and effects of dispersants. Report No. 6283, Norwegian Institute for Water ResearchGoogle Scholar
- 2.Fritt-Rasmussen J (2014) Marine oil pollution: response methods in encyclopedia of environmental management. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 3.Fritt-Rasmussen J (2010) In situ burning of arctic marine oil spills. ignitability of various oil types weathered at different ice conditions. a combined laboratory and field study. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark, LyngbyGoogle Scholar
- 4.Guenette CC, Sveum P (1995) In-situ burning of uncontained crude oil and emulsions. In: Proceedings of the 18th Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar, Environment Canada, Edmonton, Alberta, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 997–1010Google Scholar
- 5.Walavalkar AY, Kulkarni AK (1996) Comprehensive review of oil spill combustion studies. In: Proceedings of the 9th Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program Technical Seminar, Environment Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 1081–1103Google Scholar
- 17.Rangwala AS, Arsava KS, Mahnken G, Shi X. (2015) A novel experimental approach to enhance burning of oil-water emulsions by immersed objects. Report No. 1049, Bureau of Environmental and Safety Enforcement, Department of Interior, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 18.Sezer H, Arsava KS, Kozhumal SP, Rangwala AS (2017) The effect of embedded objects on pool fire burning behavior. Int J Heat Mass Transf 108(A):537–548Google Scholar
- 19.Drysdale D (2011) Figure 5.1 and Table 5.1. In: An Introduction to fire dynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fingas M (2010) Review of the north slope oil properties relevant to environmental assessment and prediction. Repot, Prince William Sound Regional Citizens’ Advisory Council (PWSRCAC) Anchorage, AlaskaGoogle Scholar
- 22.Holman JP (2009) Heat Transfer. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar