Advertisement

Ratna Kapur: Gender, Alterity, and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fish Bowl

Edward Elgar, London, 2018, 328 pp, ISBN: 978 1 78811 252 9
  • Swethaa S. Ballakrishnen
Book Review

Ratna Kapur’s latest book Gender, Alterity, and Human Rights: Freedom in a Fish Bowlmasterfully tackles a normative claim that has been gaining increasing momentum over the last few decades: the human rights agenda has hit an impasse and needs serious transformation. Using unique comparative contexts, Kapur illustrates how the liberal rights regime—despite gesturing towards freedom enhancement—operates as a counter hegemonic governance system furthering mainly state and market interests. But unlike other critical scholars who have similarly criticized the rights project from the perspective of reviving or resurrecting it, Kapur’s contribution is decidedly committed to a retreat altogether. “The grim truth” Kapur asserts, “is that, on some level, our rights-related liberal projects are on life support and further palliation is pointless” (2018: 172). The weighty metaphor of a fish bowl is pointed because it highlights the trapped, contingent freedom that the rights agenda offers,...

Notes

Acknowledgment

I thank Kathryn McNeilly for thoughts and comments on earlier drafts. This review was especially enriched by conversations with Peter Goodrich, Alejandra Azuero Quijano (who introduced me to the work of Zenju Earthlyn Manuel), and my Appa (who was my first source of initiation to Sankara’s advaita).

References

  1. Ahmed, Sara. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Devji, Faisal. 2012. The impossible Indian: Gandhi and the temptation of violence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Douzinas, Costas. 2007. Human rights and empire: The political philosophy of cosmopolitanism. London: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kennedy, David. 2005. The dark sides of virtue: Reassessing international humanitarianism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Manuel, Zenju Earthlyn. 2015. The way of tenderness: Awakening through race, sexuality, and gender. Somerville: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Natarajan, Usha, John Reynolds, Amar Bhatia, and Sujith Xavier. 2017. Third World approaches to international law: On praxis and the intellectual. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2011. Economies of abandonment: Social belonging and endurance in late liberalism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 2015. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Spivak, Gayatri. 1994. Bonding in difference. In An other tongue: Nation and ethnicity in the linguistic borderlands, ed. Alfred Arteaga, 273–285. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California Irvine School of LawIrvineUSA
  2. 2.New York University Abu DhabiAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations