Skip to main content
Log in

Multivariate analysis of MLH1 c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) mismatch repair gene variant demonstrates its pathogenicity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Familial Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic testing of an Irish kindred identified an exonic nucleotide substitution c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) in the MLH1 mismatch repair (MMR) gene. This previously unreported variant is classified as a “variant of uncertain significance” (VUS). Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and microsatellite instability (MSI) studies, genetic testing, a literature and online MMR mutation database review, in silico phenotype prediction tools, and an in vitro MMR activity assay were used to study the clinical significance of this variant. The MLH1 c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) VUS co-segregated with three cases of classic Lynch syndrome-associated malignancies over two generations, with consistent loss of MLH1 and PMS2 protein expression on IHC, and evidence of the MSI-High mutator phenotype. The leucine at position 555 is well conserved across a number of species, and this novel variant has not been reported as a normal polymorphism in the general population. In silico and in vitro analyses suggest that this variant may have a deleterious effect on the MLH1 protein and abrogate MMR activity. Evidence from clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic data suggests that MLH1 c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) is likely to be the pathogenic cause of Lynch syndrome in this family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A (2003) Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 348:919–932

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kovacs ME, Papp J, Szentirmay Z et al (2009) Deletions removing the last exon of TACSTD1 constitute a distinct class of mutations predisposing to Lynch Syndrome. Hum Mutat 30(2):197–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ligtenberg MJL, Kuiper RP, Chan TL et al (2009) Heritable somatic methylation and inactivation of MSH2 in families with Lynch syndrome due to deletion of the 3′ exons of TACSTD1. Nat Genet 41(1):114–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Crépin M, Dieu M-C, Lejeune S et al (2012) Evidence of constitutional MLH1 epimutation associated to transgenerational inheritance of cancer susceptibility. Hum Mutat 33:180–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Engel C, Forberg J, Holinski-Feder E et al (2006) Novel strategy for optimal sequential application of clinical criteria, immunohistochemistry and microsatellite analysis in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 118:115–122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Peltomaki P, Vasen HF (2004) Mutations associated with HNPCC predisposition—update of ICG-HNPCC/InSiGHT mutation database. Dis Markers 20:269–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rasmussen LJ, Heinen CD, Royer-Pokora B, Drost M, Tavtigian S, Hofstra RM, de Wind N (2012) Pathological assessment of mismatch repair gene variants in Lynch syndrome: past, present and future. Hum Mutat 33(12):1617–1625

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plon SE, Eccles DM, Easton D et al (2008) Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat 29(11):1282–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goldgar DE, Easton DF, Byrnes GB et al (2008) Genetic evidence and integration of various data sources for classifying uncertain variants into a single model. Hum Mutat 29:1282–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Khan PM, Lynch HT (1991) The international collaborative group on hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (ICG-HNPCC). Dis Colon Rectum 34:424–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Woods MO, Williams P, Careen A et al (2007) A new variant database for mismatch repair genes associated with Lynch Syndrome. Hum Mutat 28(7):669–673

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ou J, Niessen RC, Vonk J et al (2008) A database to support the interpretation of human mismatch repair gene variants. Hum Mutat 29(11):1337–1341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Drost M, Zonneveld JBM, van Dijk L et al (2010) A cell-free assay for the functional analysis of variants of the mismatch repair protein MLH1. Hum Mutat 31:247–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Domingo E, Laiho P, Ollikainen M et al (2004) BRAF screening as a low-cost effective strategy for simplifying HNPCC genetic testing. J Med Genet 41:664–668

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Boland CR, Fishel R (2005) Lynch syndrome: form, function, proteins, and basketball. Gastroenterology 129(2):751–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Spurdle AB (2013) Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia (personal communication)

  17. Hofstra RMW, Spurdle AB, Eccles D et al (2008) Tumor characteristics as an analytic tool for classifying genetic variants of uncertain clinical significance. Hum Mutat 29(11):1292–1303

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cleary SP, Cotterchio M, Jenkins MA et al (2009) Germline MutY human homologue mutations and colorectal cancer: a multisite case-control study. Gastroenterology 136:1251–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boparai KS, Dekker E, Van Eeden S et al (2008) Hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas as a phenotypic expression of MYH-associated polyposis. Gastroenterology 135:2014–2018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Strachan T, Read AP (1999) Human molecular genetics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Westphalen AA, Russell AM, Buser M et al (2005) Evidence for genetic anticipation in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Hum Genet 116:461–465

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Stella A, Surdo NC, Lastella P et al (2007) Germline novel MSH2 deletions and a founder MSH2 deletion associated with anticipation effects in HNPCC. Clin Genet 71:130–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nilbert M, Timshel S, Bernstein I, Larsen K (2009) Role for genetic anticipation in Lynch Syndrome. J Clin Oncol 27:360–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spurdle AB, Thompson BA (2013) Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Brisbane, Australia (personal communication)

  25. Plotz G, Raedle J, Spina A et al (2008) Evaluation of the MLH1 I219V alteration in DNA mismatch repair activity and ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14(5):605–611

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. P. Farrell.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Amsterdam II positive Pedigree with MLH1 c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) VUS

Appendix 2

See Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Microsatellite instability analysis of ovarian tissue DNA from obligate MLH1 c.1664 (p.Leu555Pro) carrier. (Color figure online)

Appendix 3

See Fig. 3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

MMR activity of MLH1 VUS as measured in the in vitro MMR assay. Results are shown as mean ± SEM of 4 fully independent experiments. Mock: Mock expression. I219V represents an innocuous polymorphism [25]. Asterisks Significantly higher than repair-deficient control G67R. (p < 0.001, student’s one-tailed t test). For “Mock” and “PMS2 only” reactions no repair was detected in all experiments

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farrell, M.P., Hughes, D.J., Drost, M. et al. Multivariate analysis of MLH1 c.1664T>C (p.Leu555Pro) mismatch repair gene variant demonstrates its pathogenicity. Familial Cancer 12, 741–747 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9652-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9652-9

Keywords

Navigation