Development of a Lunar Scintillometer as part of the national large optical telescope site survey

Avinash Surendran; Padmakar S. Parihar; Ravinder K. Banyal; Anusha Kalyaan

doi:10.1007/s10686-017-9567-9

Experimental Astronomy

March 2018, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 57–79 | Cite as

Development of a Lunar Scintillometer as part of the national large optical telescope site survey

Authors
Authors and affiliations

Avinash SurendranEmail author
Padmakar S. Parihar
Ravinder K. Banyal
Anusha Kalyaan

Original Article

First Online: 31 January 2018

Received: 13 April 2017

Accepted: 18 December 2017

2 Shares
74 Downloads

Abstract

Ground layer turbulence is a very important site characterization parameter used to assess the quality of an astronomical site. The Lunar Scintillometer is a simple and effective site-testing device for measuring the ground layer turbulence. It consists of a linear array of photodiodes which are sensitive to the slight variations in the moon’s brightness due to scintillation by the lower layers of the Earth’s atmosphere. The covariance of intensity values between the non-redundant photodiode baselines can be used to measure the turbulence profile from the ground up to a height determined by the furthest pair of detectors. The six channel lunar scintillometer that has been developed at the Indian Institute of Astrophysics is based closely on an instrument built by the team led by Andrei Tokovinin of Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO), Chile (Tokovinin et al., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404(3), 1186–1196 2010). We have fabricated the instrument based on the existing electronic design, and have worked on the noise analysis, an EMI (Electromagnetic Induction) resistant PCB design and the software pipeline for analyzing the data from the same. The results from the instrument’s multi-year campaign at Mount Saraswati, Hanle is also presented.

Keywords

Site survey Atmospheric turbulence Ground-layer seeing

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Andrei Tokovinin for his valuable correspondence and advice. We would like to thank the staff at IAO-Hanle, notably Mr. Dorje Angchuk and Mr. Sonam Jorphali. We would also like to thank Mr. Urgyan Dorjey, Mr. Dadul and Mr. Phunchok Angchok for the endless nights spent in monitoring the working of the instrument and the prompt despatch of data from the site. We are thankful to the staff at the IIA mechanical workshop including Mr. P.M.M. Kemkar and Mr. Periyanayagam for the mechanical design and fabrication of the instrument and the LX200 piggyback mount. We are also thankful to the Indian Institute of Astrophysics and the Department of Science and Technology for funding this project.

Appendix: Computation of the Signal-to-noise Ratio Due to Photon Noise

The extremely low signal strength requires us to ascertain the contribution of photon noise and the associated signal-to-noise ratio. Important parameters like the photocurrent generated by the full moon and the signal output due to the weakest of scintillations are also computed in this section.

Cramer et al. [3] has created a spectral irradiance profile of the moon with a combined standard uncertainty of less than 1%, between the wavelengths of 420 nm to 1000 nm, unaffected by strong molecular absorption. Although the differences in the locations of observation and the corresponding sky conditions will result in a difference in the observed spectral irradiance, we can use the spectral response generated in Cramer et al. [3] to estimate a rough value of the signal-to-noise ratio at the lower limits of the covariance of normalized intensity fluctuations (close to 10^− 4). The upper plot in Fig. 19 shows the spectral irradiance of moonlight (the data for which is derived from Cramer et al. [3]) in units of μW m^− 2 nm^− 1, and the responsivity of the FDS1010 photdiode (the data for which is derived from the FDS1010 datasheet [18]) in units of A/W. The lower plot in Fig. 19 shows the spectral response of the photodiode to moonlight, in units of A nm^− 1, which is the product of the spectral irradiance of moonlight with the responsivity of the FDS1010 photodiode (both of which are given in the upper plot of Fig. 19) and the area of the photodiode (10^− 4 m²). The area under the curve shown in the lower plot (of Fig. 19) would give an approximation of the current generated by the unbiased FDS1010 photodiode when exposed to the full moon at zenith. The area under the curve gives a current of I_{d c} = 52.36 nA. The spectral irradiance data given in Cramer et al. [3] only covers the wavelength range of 420 - 1000 nm. Hence, the actual current generated will be higher than the calculated DC photocurrent (I_{d c}) due to the full moon, if we include the photoelectrons generated for the wavelengths at which the data is not available. For the sake of computing the signal-to-noise ratio, we have taken the I_{d c}, which is computed for the area under the curve shown in the lower plot of Fig. 19.

Fig. 19
Upper plot shows the spectral irradiance of moonlight (in μW m^− 2 nm^− 1) and the responsivity of the FDS1010 photdiode (in A/W). The lower plot shows the spectral response of the photodiode to moonlight (in A nm^− 1)

For an integration time of t = 2 ms, the total photoelectrons generated by the direct current,

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} N_{s}&=& \frac{I_{dc} \times t}{e}=\frac{52.36 \times 10^{-9} \times 0.002}{1.6 \times 10^{-19}} \\ &=&6.55 \times 10^{8} \end{array} $$

(5)

The number of photoelectrons contributing to photon noise is given by,

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \sigma&=&\sqrt{N_{s}}= 2.56 \times 10^{4}, \end{array} $$

(6)

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} I_{\sigma}&=&\frac{\sigma \times e}{t}= 2.05 \times 10^{-12}A \end{array} $$

(7)

The output voltage contribution of the photon noise (after amplification) is given by,

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} V_{o\sigma}&=&I_{\sigma} \times K_{trans} \times K_{ac} \\ &=&2.05 \times 10^{-12} \times 9.1 \times 10^{6} {\Omega} \times 90 \\ &=&1.68 mV, \end{array} $$

(8)

where K_{t r a n s} is the gain of the transimpedance amplifier and K_{a c} is the AC gain of the inverting amplifier.

The amplitude of scintillations can be as low as 10^− 4 times the average flux amplitude of the moon. From (5), the number of photoelectrons generated by the smallest of scintillations can be given by,

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} N_{sc}&=&N_{s} \times 10^{-4} \\ &=&6.55 \times 10^{4} \end{array} $$

(9)

From (7) and (9), for the lowest range of scintillation amplitudes, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) because of photon noise is given by

$$ S_{p}=\frac{N_{sc}}{\sigma}= 3.2 $$

(10)

References

1.
Beckers, J.M., Leon, E., Mason, J., Wilkins, L.: Solar scintillometry: Calibration of signals and its use for seeing measurements. Sol. Phys. 176(1), 23–36 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Berdja, A., Prieto, G., Thomas-Osip, J.: First results from optical turbulence measurements at Cerro Las Campanas in 2010. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416(1), 553–558 (2011)ADSGoogle Scholar
3.
Cramer, C., Lykke, K., Woodward, J., Smith, A.: Precise measurement of lunar spectral irradiance at visible wavelengths. J. Res. Nat. Inst. Stand. Technol. 118, 396 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.
Goodwin, M., Jenkins, C., Lambert, A.: Characterisation of the optical turbulence at siding spring, p. 30 . Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/pasa.2012.009
5.
Hickson, P., Lanzetta, K.: Measuring atmospheric turbulence with a lunar scintillometer array. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116(826), 1143 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.
Karki, J.: Effect of Parasitic Capacitance in Op Amp Circuits. Tech. rep., Texas Instruments. http://www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa013a/sloa013a.pdf (2000)
7.
Lombardi, G., Navarrete, J., Sarazin, M.: Combining turbulence profiles from MASS and SLODAR: A statistical study of the evolution of the seeing at Paranal. In: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation, pp. 701,221–701,221. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2008)Google Scholar
8.
Lombardi, G., Sarazin, M., Char, F., Gonzales Avila, C., Navarrete, J., Tokovinin, A., Wilson, R., Buttlerey, T.: Surface Layer turbulence profiling with the SL-SLODAR and LuSci at ESO Paranal Observatory. In: Esposito, S., Fini, L. (eds.) Third AO4ELT Conference Adaptive Optics for ELTs Proc. (2013)Google Scholar
9.
Newman, K., Hart, M., Bendek, E., Bustos, E.: Lunar scintillometer to validate GLAO turbulence distribution measurements (2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.927127
10.
Pant, P., Stalin, C., Sagar, R.: Microthermal measurements of surface layer seeing at Devasthal site. Astron. Astrophysi. Suppl. Series 136(1), 19–25 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.
Parihar, P., Sharma, T., Surendran, A., Kemkar, P., Stanzin, U., Anupama, G., et al.: Characterization of sites for Indian large optical telescope project. J. Phys. Conf. Series IOP Publ. 595, 012025 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.
Prabhu, T.: Indian astronomical observatory, Leh-Hanle. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. Part A 80, 887–912 (2014). https://doi.org/10.16943/ptinsa/2014/v80i4/55174 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.
Roddier, F.J., Cowie, L.L., Graves, J.E., Songaila, A., McKenna, D.L., Vernin, J., Azouit, M., Caccia, J., Limburg, E.J., Roddier, C.A., et al.: Seeing at Mauna Kea: A joint UH-UN-NOAO-CFHT study. In: Astronomy’90, Tucson AZ, 11-16 Feb 90, pp. 485–491. In: International Society for Optics and Photonics (1990)Google Scholar
14.
Seykora, E.: Solar scintillation and the monitoring of solar seeing. Sol. Phys. 145(2), 389–397 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.
Skidmore, W., Els, S., Travouillon, T., Riddle, R., Bustos, E., Seguel, J., Walker, D., et al.: Thirty meter telescope site testing V: Seeing and isoplanatic angle. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 121(884), 1151 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.
Thomas-Osip, J., Bustos, E., Goodwin, M., Jenkins, C., Lambert, A., Prieto, G., Tokovinin, A.: Two campaigns to compare three turbulence profiling techniques at Las Campanas Observatory. In: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation, pp. 70,145I–70,145I. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2008)Google Scholar
17.
Thomas-Osip, J., Prieto, G., Berdja, A., Cook, K., Villanueva, S., DePoy, D., Marshall, J., Rheault, J., Allen, R., Carona, D.: Characterizing optical turbulence at the GMT Site with MooSci and MASS-DIMM. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 124(911), 84 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.
Thorabs: FDS1010 specifications sheet. Tech. rep.. https://www.thorlabs.com/drawings/490e7b8a9a384fc8-7B110152-BECE-B9D1-7D9CCE6480F25B1E/FDS1010-CAL-SpecSheet.pdf (2017)
19.
Tokovinin, A.: Seeing improvement with ground-layer adaptive optics. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 116(824), 941 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.
Tokovinin, A.: Turbulence profiles from the scintillation of stars, planets and moon. In: Cruz-González, I, Echevarría, J., Hiriart, D. (eds.) Workshop on Astronomical Site Evaluation, vol. 31, pp 61–70 (2007)Google Scholar
21.
Tokovinin, A.: Restoration of continuous turbulence profile from lunar scintillation. Tech. rep., CTIO, NOAO. http://www.ctio.noao.edu/atokovin/profiler/restor3.pdf (2008)
22.
Tokovinin, A.: Where is the surface-layer turbulence? In: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation, pp. 77,331N–77,331N. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2010)Google Scholar
23.
Tokovinin, A., Bustos, E., Berdja, A.: Near-ground turbulence profiles from lunar scintillometer. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 404(3), 1186–1196 (2010)ADSGoogle Scholar
24.
Uraguchi, F., Takato, N., Iwata, I., Koyano, H., Mikami, Y.: First results from turbulence profiling with SODAR at Subaru Telescope (2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.789971
25.
Vernin, J., Muñoz-Tuñón, C.: Optical seeing at La Palma Observatory. I-General guidelines and preliminary results at the Nordic Optical Telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 257, 811–816 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
26.
Vernin, J., Muñoz-Tuñón, C.: Optical seeing at La Palma Observatory. 2: Intensive site testing campaign at the Nordic optical telescope. Astron. Astrophys. 284, 311–318 (1994)ADSGoogle Scholar
27.
Villanueva, S. Jr, Depoy, D., Marshall, J., Berdja, A., Rheault, J., Prieto, G., Allen, R., Carona, D.: MooSci: A lunar scintillometer. In: SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation, pp. 773,547–773,547. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Avinash Surendran
- 1
Email authorView author's OrcID profile
Padmakar S. Parihar
- 1
Ravinder K. Banyal
- 1
Anusha Kalyaan
- 2

1.Indian Institute of AstrophysicsBangaloreIndia
2.School of Earth and Space ExplorationArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Development of a Lunar Scintillometer as part of the national large optical telescope site survey

Abstract

Keywords

Notes

Acknowledgements

References

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Cookies