Don’t waste your time: predators avoid prey with conspicuous colors that signal long handling time
- 107 Downloads
Most studies on warning signal theory have focused on aposematic prey, which signal unpalatability through conspicuous signals. Palatable prey that are difficult to capture or process may also use conspicuous signals to advertise unprofitability to predators. Theory predicts that predators should avoid prey with long handling time, especially when other prey with shorter handling times are abundant. However, it is unclear if prey can benefit by signaling longer handling time. In experiments with dough models as prey, we show that chickens can learn to associate colors with increased handling time and avoid such prey when alternative prey are abundant. Overall, our experiment demonstrates that advertising longer handling time to predators can be advantageous to prey when other more profitable prey are abundant.
KeywordsHandling time Antipredatory strategies Conspicuous colorations
We thank Jayasooryan CS, Nawaf AM, Rohit Anand and Harshad Mayekar for help with the experiment. We thank Shaji for permitting us to carry out the experiment in his property. We thank Almut Kelber, Balamurali GS and Hema Somanathan for discussions. John Endler provided insightful comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by an INSPIRE Faculty Award from the Department of Science and Technology (DST/INSPIRE/04/2013/000476) to UK.
VPC conceived the study, designed and carried out the experiment, and analyzed the data; UK provided materials; VPC and UK wrote the paper and gave final approval.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. The experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee of Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram.
- Altwegg R, Eng M, Caspersen S, Anholt BR (2006) Functional response and prey defence level in an experimental predator–prey system. Evol Ecol Res 8:115–128Google Scholar
- Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Cott HB (1940) Adaptive coloration in animals. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68:225–252Google Scholar
- Krebs JR (1980) Optimal foraging, predation risk and territory defence. Ardea 68:83–90Google Scholar
- Liu H-X, Rajapaksha P, Wang Z et al (2018) An update on the sense of taste in chickens: a better developed system than previously appreciated. J Nutr Food Sci 8:686Google Scholar
- O’Neill HM (2008) Influence of storage and temperature treatment on nutritional value of wheat for poultry. PhD thesis, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Rajendran MV (1985) Studies in uropeltid snakes. Madurai Kamaraj University, MaduraiGoogle Scholar
- Rowe C, Skelhorn J, Halpin CG (2017) Avian cognition and the evolution of warning signals. In: Cate CT, Healy SD (eds) Avian cognition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Therneau TM (2018) coxme: mixed effects Cox models. R package version 2.2-10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=coxme. Accessed June 2019
- Veselý P, Ernestová B, Nedvěd O, Fuchs R (2017) Do predator energy demands or previous exposure influence protection by aposematic coloration of prey? Curr Zool 63:259–267Google Scholar
- Winters AE, Wilson NG, van den Berg CP et al (2018) Toxicity and taste: unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 285:20180457Google Scholar
- Zahavi A, Zahavi A (1997) The handicap principle: a missing piece of Darwin’s puzzle. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar