, 215:94 | Cite as

Two-stage selection in tea breeding

  • G. K. Tuwei
  • R. H. V. CorleyEmail author


In breeding a clonal crop such as tea, selection is a two-stage process. In the first stage the highest yielding individual seedlings are chosen; these are then propagated and planted in clone trials in the second stage. A high selection intensity at the first stage risks eliminating most of the superior genotypes. The optimal proportion to be selected depends on the correlation between seedling ortet and clone performance. For yield this correlation is often fairly low, and in our trials with tea, selection of the highest yielding 15–25% of seedlings appears optimal. The ortet-clone correlation may be improved by more precise recording of ortet yields; in tea, this can be done by extending the recording period, to reduce the influence of year-to-year and seasonal variation. The relevance of these observations to other clonally propagated crops is discussed.


Breeding progress Camellia sinensis Clones Heritability 



We thank Unilever Tea Kenya Ltd for permission to publish.


  1. Carr MKV (2018) Advances in tea agronomy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Corley RHV (2018) Studies of bunch analysis 2—bunch sampling to estimate oil yield. J Oil Palm Res 30:206–218Google Scholar
  3. Corley RHV, Tinker PB (2016) The oil palm. Wiley Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Corley RHV, Tuwei GK (2018) The well-bred tea bush—developing high-yielding clones. In: Carr MKV (ed) Advances in tea agronomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 106–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kamunya SM, Wachira FN (2003) Alternative means for rapid muliplication of tea: use of shoots in tea propagation—preliminary indications. Tea 24:66–68Google Scholar
  6. Lockwood G (1971) Early results from a trial of Upper Amazon cocoa clones in Ghana. Expl Agric 7:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mphangwe NIK, Nyirenda HE (2001) Procedures for the propagation of plucking shoots and composites in speedling trays. Q Newslett Tea Res Found Cent Afr 142:12–15Google Scholar
  8. Simmonds NW (1985) Two-stage selection strategy in plant breeding. Heredity 55:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tan H (1987) Strategies in rubber tree breeding. In: Abbott AJ, Atkin RK (eds) Improving vegetatively propagated crops. Academic Press, London, pp 27–62Google Scholar
  10. TRFK (1986) Annual technical report. Tea Research Foundation of Kenya, KerichoGoogle Scholar
  11. Tuwei GK, Corley RHV (2017) Pollination methods and inbreeding of tea. Tea 38:3–8Google Scholar
  12. Tuwei GK, Kaptich FKK, Langat MC, Chomboi KC, Corley RHV (2008) Effects of grafting on tea 1—growth, yield and quality. Expl Agric 44:521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Visser T (1969) Tea—Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze. In: Ferwerda FP, de Wit F (eds) Outlines of perennial crop breeding in the tropics. Wageningen Univ, Wageningen, pp. 459–493Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unilever Tea Kenya LtdKerichoKenya
  2. 2.HighlandsBedfordUK

Personalised recommendations