Association of flowering time with phenological and productivity traits in chickpea
- 61 Downloads
Phenology is an important trait for the adaption of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to various target environments. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of flowering time on other phenological traits and yield-related traits. F2 and F3 segregating populations derived from the crosses of four early-flowering lines (ICCV 96029, ICC 5810, BGD 132 and ICC 16641) with a late-flowering cultivar (CDC Frontier) were used. In all crosses, flowering time showed significant positive association with days to pod initiation, days to maturity, plant height and biomass and non-significant correlation with number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant and grain yield per plant. Flowering time had a positive correlation with 100-seed weight in all crosses, with the exception of ICC 16641 × CDC Frontier where the correlation was non-significant. Harvest index was negatively associated with flowering time. In most of the crosses, early- and late-maturing F3 bulks showed significant differences with respect to biomass and harvest index, while for grain yield and 100-seed weight the differences were found to be non-significant. These results indicate that flowering time could be used as a reliable selection criterion in breeding for early-maturing chickpea and that a reduction in the duration of flowering time and maturity may not necessarily have a yield penalty in these genetic backgrounds.
KeywordsCicer arietinum Correlation coefficient Early maturity Grain yield
This research work was supported by CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes.
PMG coordinated this project. PMG, KPV, SS guided BPM in planning and designing this study. BPM, PMG and SS were involved in developing the mapping populations, designing field experimentation, phenotyping and data analysis. BPM, PMG, and SS drafted the manuscript, and all the authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Erskine W, Kosmenuglu I, Muehlbauer FJ, Summerfield RJ (2000) Breeding for increased biomass and persistent crop residues in cool-season food legumes. In: Knight R (ed) Linking research and marketing opportunities for pulses in the 21st Century. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- FAOSTAT (2016). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
- Gaur PM, Kumar J, Gowda CLL, Pande S, Siddique KHM, Khan TN, Warkentin TD, Chaturvedi SK, Than AM, Ketema D (2008a) Breeding chickpea for early phenology: perspectives, progress, prospects. In: Kharkwal MC (ed) Food legumes for nutritional security, sustainable agriculture, vol 2. Indian Society of Genetics, Plant Breeding, New Delhi, pp 39–48Google Scholar
- Gaur PM, Samineni S, Thudi M, Tripathi S, Sajja SB, Jayalakshmi V, Mannur DM, Vijayakumar AG, Ganga Rao NVPR, Ojiewo C, Fikre A, Kimurto P, Kileo RO, Girma N, Chaturvedi SK, Varshney RK, Dixit GP (2018) Integrated breeding approaches for improving drought and heat adaptation in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Breed. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12641
- Or E, Hovav R, Abbo S (1999) A major gene for flowering time in chickpea. Crop Sci 39:315–322Google Scholar
- Siddique KHM, Khan TN (1996) Early-flowering and high yielding chickpea lines from ICRISAT ready for release in Western Australia. Int Chickpea Pigeonpea Newsl 3:22–24Google Scholar
- Sivasakthi K, Thudi M, Tharanya M, Kale SM, Kholova J, Halime MH, Jaganathan D, Baddam R, Thirunalasundari T, Gaur PM, Varshney RK, Vadez V (2018) Plant vigour QTLs co-map with an earlier reported QTL hotspot for drought tolerance while water saving QTLs map in other regions of the chickpea genome. BMC Plant Biol 18:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar