, 214:225 | Cite as

Variance components and heritability of traits related to root: shoot biomass allocation and drought tolerance in wheat

  • I. MathewEmail author
  • H. Shimelis
  • L. Mwadzingeni
  • R. Zengeni
  • M. Mutema
  • V. Chaplot


Enhanced root growth in plants is fundamental to improve soil water exploration and drought tolerance. Understanding of the variance components and heritability of root biomass allocation is key to design suitable breeding strategies and to enhance the response to selection. This study aimed to determine variance components and heritability of biomass allocation and related traits in 99 genotypes of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and one triticale (X. Triticosecale Wittmack) under drought-stressed and non-stressed conditions in the field and greenhouse using a 10 × 10 alpha lattice design. Days to heading (DTH), days to maturity (DTM), number of tillers (NPT), plant height (PH), spike length (SL), shoot and root biomass (SB, RB), root to shoot ratio (RS), thousand kernel weight (TKW) and yield (GY) were recorded. Analyses of variance, variance components, heritability and genetic correlations were computed. Significant (p < 0.05) genetic and environmental variation were observed for all the traits except for spike length. Drought stress decreased heritability of RS from 47 to 28% and GY from 55 to 17%. The correlations between RS with PH, NPT, SL, SB and GY were weaker under drought-stress (r ≤ − 0.50; p < 0.05) compared to non-stressed conditions, suggesting that lower root biomass allocation under drought stress compromises wheat productivity. The negative association between GY and RS (r = − 0.41 and − 0.33; p < 0.05), low heritability (< 42%) and high environmental variance (> 70%) for RS observed in this population constitute several bottlenecks for improving yield and root mass simultaneously. However, indirect selection for DTH, PH, RB, and TKW, could help optimize RS and simultaneously improve drought tolerance and yield under drought-stressed conditions.


Correlation Genetic variance Heritability Root-to-shoot ratio Water stress Wheat 

Supplementary material

10681_2018_2302_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)


  1. Ahmad N, Khan AS, Kashif M, Rehman A (2017) Genetic studies of biomass partitioning in wheat underwater stress conditions. J Anim Plant Sci 27(1):144–152Google Scholar
  2. Allard RW (1999) Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Aparicio AG, Zuki SM, Azpilicueta MM, Barbero FÁ, Pastorino MJ (2015) Genetic versus environmental contributions to variation in seedling resprouting in Nothofagus obliqua. Tree Genet Genomes 11(23):1–14Google Scholar
  4. Bai C, Liang Y, Hawkesford MJ (2013) Identification of QTLs associated with seedling root traits and their correlation with plant height in wheat. J Exp Bot 64(6):1745–1753PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benincasa P, Reale L, Tedeschini E, Ferri V, Cerri M, Ghitarrini S, Porfiri O (2017) The relationship between grain and ovary size in wheat: an analysis of contrasting grain weight cultivars under different growing conditions. Field Crops Res 210:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bo W, Fu G, Wang Z, Xu F, She Y, Xu J, Wu R (2013) Systems mapping: how to map genes for biomass allocation toward an ideotype. Brief Bioinform 15:660–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenton ZW, Cooper EA, Myers MT, Boyles RE, Shakoor N, Zielinski KJ, Kresovich S (2016) A genomic resource for the development, improvement, and exploitation of sorghum for bioenergy. Genetics 204:21–33PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burton GW (1952) Quantitative inheritance in grasses. In Proceedings of 6th international grassland congress, Reading, UK pp 277–283Google Scholar
  9. Busemeyer L, Ruckelshausen A, Möller K, Melchinger AE, Alheit KV, Maurer HP, Würschum T (2013) Precision phenotyping of biomass accumulation in triticale reveals temporal genetic patterns of regulation. Sci Rep 3(2442):1–6Google Scholar
  10. Ceccarelli S (1989) Wide adaptation: how wide? Euphytica 40(3):197–205Google Scholar
  11. Curran-Everett D (2013) Explorations in statistics: the analysis of ratios and normalized data. Adv Physiol Educ 37(3):213–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DAFF (Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries) (2010) Wheat production guideline. DAFF, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalal A, Attia Z, Moshelion M (2017) To produce or to survive: how plastic is your crop stress physiology? Front Plant Sci 8(2067):1–6Google Scholar
  14. Davies WJ, Zhang J (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Biol 42:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards CE, Ewers BE, Weinig C (2016) Genotypic variation in biomass allocation in response to field drought has a greater effect on yield than gas exchange or phenology. BMC Plant Biol 16(1):185–204PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehdaie B, Layne AP, Waines JG (2012) Root system plasticity to drought influences grain yield in bread wheat. Euphytica 186:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eid MH (2009) Estimation of heritability and genetic advance of yield traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under drought condition. Int J Genet Mol Bio 1(7):115–120Google Scholar
  18. Ekanayake IJ, O’Toole JC, Garrity DP, Masajo TM (1985) Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought resistance in rice. Crop Sci 25:927–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fang Y, Du Y, Wang J, Wu A, Qiao S, Xu B, Zhang S, Siddique KH, Chen Y (2017) Moderate drought stress affected root growth and grain yield in old, modern and newly released cultivars of winter wheat. Front Plant Sci 8(672):1–14Google Scholar
  20. Gillespie JH, Turelli M (1989) Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of polygenic variation. Genetics 21(1):129–138Google Scholar
  21. Govindaraj M, Rai KN, Shanmugasundaram P (2016) Intra-population genetic variance for grain iron and zinc contents and agronomic traits in pearl millet. Crop J 4:48–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gowda M, Hahn V, Reif JC, Longin CFH, Alheit K, Maurer HP (2011a) Potential for simultaneous improvement of grain and bio-mass yield in Central European winter triticale germplasm. Field Crops Res 121:153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gowda VR, Henry A, Yamauchi A, Shashidhar HE, Serraj R (2011b) Root biology and genetic improvement for drought avoidance in rice. Field Crops Res 122:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grewal KS, Buchan GD, Tonkin PJ (1990) Estimation of field capacity and wilting point of some New Zealand soils from their saturation percentages. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 18(4):241–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Griffiths CA, Paul MJ (2017) Targeting carbon for crop yield and drought resilience. J Sci Food Agric 97(14):4663–4671PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herzig P, Maurer A, Draba V, Sharma R, Draicchio F, Bull H, Milne L, Thomas WT, Flavell AJ, Pillen K (2018) Contrasting genetic regulation of plant development in wild barley grown in two European environments revealed by nested association mapping. J Exp Bot 69(7):1517–1531PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirte J, Leifeld J, Abiven S, Oberholzer HR, Mayer J (2018) Below ground carbon inputs to soil via root biomass and rhizodeposition of field-grown maize and wheat at harvest are independent of net primary productivity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 265:556–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar R, Sarawagi AK, Ramos C, Amarante ST, Ismail AM, Wade LJ (2006) Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res 98:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liermann M, Steel A, Rosing M, Guttorp P (2004) Random denominators and the analysis of ratio data. Environ Ecol Stat 11(1):55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu C, Yang Z, Hu YG (2015) Drought resistance of wheat alien chromosome addition lines evaluated by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought resistance index of grain yield. Field Crops Res 179:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu Y, Lin Y, Gao S, Li Z, Ma J, Deng M, Zheng Y (2017a) A genome-wide association study of 23 agronomic traits in Chinese wheat landraces. Plant J 91:861–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Zhang J, Hu YG, Chen J (2017b) Dwarfing genes Rht4 and Rht-B1b affect plant height and key agronomic traits in common wheat under two water regimes. Field Crops Research 204:242–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lopes MS, Reynolds MP (2010) Partitioning of assimilates to deeper roots is associated with cooler canopies and increased yield under drought in wheat. Funct Plant Biol 37:147–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ludewig F, Flügge UI (2013) Role of metabolite transporters in source-sink carbon allocation. Front Plant Sci 4(231):1–16Google Scholar
  35. Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, Reay D, Robertson GP, Smith P (2016) Climate-smart soils. Nature 532:49–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Payne RW, Murray DA, Harding SA (2017) An introduction to the GenStat command language. VSN International, Hemel HempsteadGoogle Scholar
  37. Pronyk C, Mazza G (2011) Optimization of processing conditions for the fractionation of triticale straw using pressurized low polarity water. Bioresour Technol 102:2016–2025PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rattey A, Shorter R, Chapman S, Dreccer F, van Herwaarden A (2009) Variation for and relationships among biomass and grain yield component traits conferring improved yield and grain weight in an elite wheat population grown in variable yield environments. Crop Pasture Sci 60:717–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richards RA, Rebetzke GJ, Watt M, Condon AT, Spielmeyer W, Dolferus R (2010) Breeding for improved water productivity in temperate cereals: phenotyping, quantitative trait loci, markers and the selection environment. Funct Plant Biol 37(2):85–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robinson HF, Comstock RE, Harvey PH (1955) Genetic variances in open pollinated varieties of corn. Genetics 40:45–60PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Saeed M, Khalil IH (2017) Combining ability and narrow-sense heritability in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rainfed environment. Sarhad J Agric 33:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanjari PA, Yazdansepas A (2010) Evaluation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under pre-and post-anthesis drought stress conditions. J Agric Sci Technol 10:109–121Google Scholar
  43. Sharma JR (1998) Statistical and biometrical techniques in plant breeding. New Age International (P) Limited Publishers, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharp RE, Davies WJ (1989) A restricted supply of water. In: Hamlyn G. In: Jones HG (ed) Plants, under stress: biochemistry, physiology and ecology and their application to plant improvement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shimelis H, Shiringani R (2010) Variance components and heritabilities of yield and agronomic traits among cowpea genotypes. Euphytica 176:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smith DM, Inman-Bamber NG, Thorburn PJ (2005) Growth and function of the sugarcane root system. Field Crops Res 92:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Snedecor GW (1946) Statistical methods, 4th. edn. Iowa State College Press, Ames, pp 134–136Google Scholar
  48. Solomon G, Basazen F, Balcha Y, Bedada G (2007) Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack)-a new addition to the Ethiopian cereals. Afr Crop Sci J 8:1991–1995Google Scholar
  49. Song L, Li FM, Fan XW, Xiong YC, Wang WQ, Wu XB et al (2009) Soil water availability and plant competition affect the yield of spring wheat. Eur J Agron 31:51–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Steel RG, Torrie J (1960) Principals and procedures of statistics. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Subira J, Ammar K, Álvaro F, Del Moral LF, Dreisigacker S, Royo C (2016) Changes in durum wheat root and aerial biomass caused by the introduction of the Rht-B1b dwarfing allele and their effects on yield formation. Plant Soil 403(1–2):291–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tian X, Wen W, Xie L, Fu L, Xu D, Fu C, He Z (2017) Molecular mapping of reduced plant height gene Rht24 in bread wheat. Front Plant Sci 8:1379PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsegaye D, Dessalegn T, Dessalegn Y, Share G (2012) Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in durum wheat germplasm (Triticum durum Desf). Agric Res Rev 1(4):107–112Google Scholar
  54. Weiner J (2004) Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Syst 6(4):207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. White AC, Rogers A, Rees M, Osborne CP (2016) How can we make plants grow faster? A source–sink perspective on growth rate. J Exp Bot 67(1):31–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan W, Hunt LA (2001) Interpretation of genotype × environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario. Crop Sci 41:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalScottsvilleSouth Africa
  2. 2.Agricultural Research Council-Institute of Agricultural EngineeringSilvertonSouth Africa
  3. 3.Laboratoire d’Océanographie et du Climat: Expérimentations et approches numériques (LOCEAN)UMR 7159, IRD/C NRS/UPMC/MNHN, IPSLParisFrance

Personalised recommendations