Comparison of seven colchicine-induced tetraploid clones with their original diploid clones in purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea L.)
- 341 Downloads
Seven clones of colchicine-induced tetraploid purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea L.) plants were grown on a farm for comparison with their corresponding original diploid plants. In the first year of cultivation, the plant height, number of capitula, and inflorescence (branched flower stalk) were significantly reduced in all of the tetraploid plants, while the length-to-width leaf ratio, pollen size, and root thickness were significantly increased. Although the tetraploid plants had larger seeds, most of the seeds of tetraploid plants were not fully filled and the naked seeds (i.e., seeds observed without the outer seed coat) were noticeably smaller than those of the diploid plants. In the second year of cultivation, the phenological stages were markedly delayed in the tetraploid plants; the number of capitula increased much more in tetraploid plants than in diploid plants. Among the seven tetraploid clones, two yielded significantly higher plant biomass and higher cichoric acid content per gram dry weight as well as per plant. The results of the present experiments indicate that some effects of tetraploidization of diploid E. purpurea are genotype-dependent, suggesting that the tetraploidization of more genotypes of the diploid is needed to breed better tetraploid varieties.
KeywordsPurple coneflower Tetraploid Cultivation Growth In vitro culture Cichoric acid
This research was funded by a grant from Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (2011B031700026).
- Ade R, Rai MK (2010) Review: colchicine, current advances and future prospects. Bioscience 2:90–96Google Scholar
- Ault JR (2007) Coneflower, Echinacea species. In: Anderson NO (ed) Flower breeding and genetics: issues, challenges and opportunities for the 21 century. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 801–824Google Scholar
- Chen R, Chen XL, Li QL, Yang YS, Wu H (2012) Micropropagation by repeatedly inducing axillary bud formation of different gene dosage purple coneflower plants. In: Proceedings of the international conference on biomedical engineering and biotechnology, Macao, pp 1056–1059. May 28–30 2012Google Scholar
- Chen R, Jin YH, Li QL, Chen XL, Yang YS, Wu H (2013) Some effective methods for dealing with the problem of hyperhydricity in cloning purple coneflower. In: 2013 International conference on biological, medical and chemical engineering (BMCE2013), Dec. 1-2, 2013, Hong Kong, pp 319–325Google Scholar
- Chen XL, Chen R, Li QL, Yang YS, Wu H (2013) Cytological comparison of diploid, triploid, tetraploid and hexaploid in purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea L.). 2013 International conference on biological, medical and chemical engineering (BMCE2013), Dec. 1-2, 2013, Hong Kong, pp 212–220Google Scholar
- Grange S, Leskovar DI, Pike LM, Cobb BG (2003) Seed coat structure and oxygen-enhanced environments affect germination of triploid watermelon. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:253–259Google Scholar
- Koul S, Sambyal M, Kitchlu SK, Bakshi SK, Kaul MK (2010) Development, micropropagation and characterization of colchiploid of Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench. Indian J Biotechnol 9:221–224Google Scholar
- Majdi M, Karimzadeh G, Malboobi MA, Omidbaigi R, Mirzaghaderi G (2010) Induction of tetraploidy to feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium Schulz-Bip.): morphological, physiological, cytological, and phytochemical changes. HortScience 45:16–21Google Scholar
- Sejdler LK, Dabrowska J (1998) Studies on the biology of flowering and fruiting of purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea Moench). Part 1. Biology of flowering and fruiting. Herba Polonica 42:83–87Google Scholar
- Stephens LC (2008) Self-incompatibility in Echinacea purpurea. HortScience 43:1350–1354Google Scholar