Serendipity as an emerging design principle of the infosphere: challenges and opportunities
Underestimated for a long time, serendipity is an increasingly recognized design principle of the infosphere. Being influenced by environmental and human factors, the experience of serendipity encompasses fundamental phases of production, distribution and consumption of information. On the one hand, design information architectures for serendipity increases the diversity of information encountered as well as users’ control over information processes. On the other hand, serendipity is a capability. It helps individuals to internalize and adopt strategies that increase the chances of experiencing it. As such, the pursuit for serendipity can help to burst filter bubbles and weaken echo chambers in social media. The article reviews the literature on emerging issues surrounding serendipity in human–computer interactions. By doing so, it firstly presents the study of serendipity and the debate about its role in digital environments. Then, it introduces the main features of a preliminary architecture for serendipity. Finally, it analyzes from an interdisciplinary perspective the values that embraces and sustains. The conclusion is that serendipity can be conceived as an emerging design and ethical principle able to strengthen media pluralism and other emerging human rights in the context of online personalization. Main limitations and potential unintended consequences are also discussed.
KeywordsSerendipity Design ethics Nudging Personalization Filter bubbles Echo chambers
This research is funded by the ERASMUS MUNDUS program in Law, Science and Technology (LAST-JD) coordinated by University of Bologna.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Research for this paper did not involve animal or human participants; neither was there a need to request informed consent from anyone.
- Albanie, S., Shakespeare, H., & Gunter, T. (2017). Unknowable manipulators: Social network curator algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.04895.Google Scholar
- Auray, N. (2007). Folksonomy: The new way to serendipity. International Journal of Digital Economics, 65, 67–88.Google Scholar
- Backstrom, L. (2013). News feed FYI: A window into news feed (p. 6). Menlo Park: Facebook for Business.Google Scholar
- Bodo, B., Helberger, N., Irion, K., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., Moller, J., van de Velde, B., … de Vreese, C. (2017). Tackling the algorithmic control crisis—The technical, legal, and ethical challenges of research into algorithmic agents. Yale JL & Tech., 19, 133.Google Scholar
- Bogers, T., & Björneborn, L. (2013). Micro-serendipity: Meaningful coincidences in everyday life shared on Twitter. iConference, 2013, 196–208.Google Scholar
- Bozdag, E., & Timmermans, E. (2011). Values in the filter bubble Ethics of Personalization Algorithms in Cloud Computing. In Proceedings, 1st International Workshop on Values in Design–Building Bridges between RE, HCI and Ethics, Lisbon.Google Scholar
- Campos, J., & Figueiredo, A. D. (2002). Programming for serendipity. In Proceedings of the AAAI fall symposium on chance discovery—The discovery and management of chance events.Google Scholar
- Carr, N. (2016). Utopia is creepy: And other provocations. New York: W W Norton & Co Inc.Google Scholar
- Carson, A. B. (2015). Public discourse in the age of personalization: Psychological explanations and political implications of search engine bias and the filter bubble. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 7(1).Google Scholar
- Cobo, C., & Moravec, J. (2011). Invisible Learning. Toward a New Ecology of Education. Col·lecció Transmedia XXI. Laboratori de Mitjans Interactius/Publicacions i Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona. Barcelona.Google Scholar
- Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier?. In Ecai (Vol. 2012, pp. 16–21).Google Scholar
- Cunningham, D. J. (2001). Fear and loathing in the information age. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 8(4), 64–74.Google Scholar
- Danezis, G., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Hansen, M., Hoepman, J. H., Metayer, D. L., Tirtea, R., & Schiffner, S. (2015). Privacy and data protection by design-from policy to engineering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.03726.Google Scholar
- de Melo, R. M. C. (2018). On serendipity in the digital medium: Towards a framework for valuable unpredictability in interaction Design.Google Scholar
- Delacroix, S. (2018). Taking turing by surprise? Designing digital computers for morally-loaded contexts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04548.Google Scholar
- Derakhshan, H. (2016). Social Media Is Killing Discourse Because It’s Too Much Like TV in MIT Technology Review. Accessed Jan 15, 2018, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/602981/social-media-is-killing-discourse-because-its-too-much-like-tv/.
- Domingos, P. (2015). The master algorithm: How the quest for the ultimate learning machine will remake our world. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Dunbar, K., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, 705–725.Google Scholar
- Erdelez, S. (1997). Information encountering: a conceptual framework for accidental information discovery. In Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context (pp. 412–421). Taylor Graham Publishing, London.Google Scholar
- Erdelez, S., & Jahnke, I. (2018). Personalized systems and illusion of serendipity: A sociotechnical lens. In Workshop of WEPIR 2018.Google Scholar
- Fogg, B. J., Lee, E., & Marshall, J. (2002). Interactive technology and persuasion. The Handbook of Persuasion: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Forsyth, M. (2014). The unknown unknown: Bookshops and the delight of not getting what you wanted. London: Icon Books Ltd.Google Scholar
- Friedman, B., Kahn, P., & Borning, A. (2002). Value sensitive design: Theory and methods. University of Washington technical report, pp. 02–12.Google Scholar
- Gal, M. S. (2017). Algorithmic challenges to autonomous choice. Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 2017.Google Scholar
- Ge, M., Delgado-Battenfeld, C., & Jannach, D. (2010). Beyond accuracy: Evaluating recommender systems by coverage and serendipity. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems (pp. 257–260). ACM, New York.Google Scholar
- Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, p. 167.Google Scholar
- Gup, T. (1997). Technology and the end of serendipity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(21), A52.Google Scholar
- Helberger, N., Karppinen, K., & D’Acunto, L. (2016). Exposure diversity as a design principle for recommender systems. Information, Communication & Society, 21, 1–17.Google Scholar
- Hildebrandt, M. (2017). Privacy as protection of the incomputable self: Agonistic machine learning.Google Scholar
- Hoffmann, C. P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M., & Ranzini, G. (2015). Diversity by choice: Applying a social cognitive perspective to the role of public service media in the digital age. International Journal of Communication, 9(1), 1360–1381.Google Scholar
- Hoven, J. van den, Miller, S., & Pogge, T. (Eds.). (2017). Designing in ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Karppinen, K. (2008). Media and the paradoxes of pluralism. The Media and Social Theory, 27–42.Google Scholar
- Keymolen, E. (2016). Trust on the line: A philosophycal exploration of trust in the networked era.Google Scholar
- Kroes, P., & van de Poel, I. (2015). Design for values and the definition, specification, and operationalization of values. Handbook of Ethics, Values, and Technological Design: Sources, Theory, Values and Application Domains, 151–178.Google Scholar
- Krotoski, A. (2011). Digital serendipity: Be careful what you don’t wish for in The Guardian International Edition. Accessed Jan 15, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/21/google-serendipity-profiling-aleks-krotoski.
- Loepp, B., Hussein, T., & Ziegler, J. (2014). Choice-based preference elicitation for collaborative filtering recommender systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, 2014), pp. 3085–3094.Google Scholar
- Lupo, L. (2012). Filosofia della serendipity (Vol. 73). Napoli: Guida Editori.Google Scholar
- Lynch, M. P. (2016). The Internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Makri, S. (2014). Serendipity is not Bullshit. Paper presented at the EuroHCIR 2014, The 4th European Symposium on Human-Computer Interaction and Information Retrieval, 13 Sep 2014, London, UK.Google Scholar
- Marcus, G. E. (2010). Sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
- Matt, C., Benlian, A., Hess, T., & Weiß, C. (2014). Escaping from the Filter Bubble? The Effects of Novelty and Serendipity on Users’ Evaluations of Online Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS2014), Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- McCay-Peet, L., & Toms, E. G. (2013). Proposed facets of a serendipitous digital environment. In Teoksessa iConference 2013 Proceedings, ss. 688–691.Google Scholar
- Meckel, M. (2011). “Sos—save our serendipity”, Personal Blog. https://www.miriammeckel.de/2011/10/11/sos-save-our-serendipity/.
- Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (2006). The travels and adventures of serendipity: A study in sociological semantics and the sociology of science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Olma, S. (2016). In Defence of Serendipity. Watkins Media Limited, 2016.Google Scholar
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Pentland, A. (2015). Social physics: How social networks can make us smarter. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Polly, J. A. (1992). Surfing the internet. An Introduction. Wilson Library Bulletin, 66(10), 38.Google Scholar
- Quattrociocchi, W., Scala, A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2016). Echo chambers on Facebook. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2795110.
- Race, T., & Makri, S. (2016). Accidental information discovery: Cultivating serendipity in the digital age. Cambridge: Chandos Publishing.Google Scholar
- Reviglio, U. (2017). Serendipity by design? How to turn from diversity exposure to diversity experience to face filter bubbles in social media. In International Conference on Internet Science (pp. 281–300). Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Rubin, V. L., Burkell, J., & Quan-Haase, A. (2011). Facets of serendipity in everyday chance encounters: A grounded theory approach to blog analysis. Information Research, 16(3), 27Google Scholar
- Schmidt, E. (2006). How we’re doing and where we’re going. Google Inc. Press Day 2006.Google Scholar
- Shearer, E., & Gottfried, J. (2017). News use across social media platforms 2017. Pew Research Center, Journalism and Media.Google Scholar
- Smith, A. (2018). Many Facebook users don’t understand how the site’s news feed works. Pew Research Center, Journalism and Media.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sunstein, C. R. (2017c). In praise of serendipity in The Economist, Accessed Feb 4, 2018, from https://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21718464-social-media-should-encourage-chance-encounters-not-customised-experiences-praise.
- Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder (Vol. 3). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- van den Hoven, J., & Rooksby, E. (2008). Distributive justice and the value of information: A (broadly) Rawlsian approach. Information Technology and Moral Philosophy, p. 376. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
- Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.Google Scholar
- Zarsky, T. Z. (2002). Mine your own business: Making the case for the implications of the data mining of personal information in the forum of public opinion. Yale JL & Tech, 5, 1.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, E. (2013). Rewire: Digital cosmopolitans in the age of connection. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. J., Trilling, D., Moeller, J., Bodó, B., De Vreese, C. H., & Helberger, N. (2016). Should we worry about filter bubbles? Internet Policy Review. Journal on Internet Regulation, 5(1), 16.Google Scholar