Advertisement

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 39–58 | Cite as

An investigation into school inspection policies in Western Australian state education performed by the Expert Review Group

  • Christine CunninghamEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The aim of this work is to learn more about the Expert Review Group (ERG), a small but powerful team of bureaucrats in Western Australia’s Department of Education whose role is to inspect the quality and standards of pre-K to year 12 government schools. Critical education policy analysis is utilised. Iterative understandings were developed through historical and contemporary document analysis of legislature, policy documents, department reports, academic journal articles, media reports and social media information. This study makes transparent why the ERG was created and how it functions today. ERG school inspections are of proportional, risk-based type, targeting only those schools operating extraordinarily below or above the official measurements of adequate school performance. Very limited public analysis of the ERG had been undertaken prior to this study; thus, the data explored here are original and new to the public record. The ERG’s work and influence have expanded over its first decade of operation. However, there is no publicly available evidence that draws a link between ERG inspections and subsequent improvement in school performance for any ERG-inspected school.

Keywords

School inspection Western Australia Government education 

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the “Right” way: Markets, standards, god and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barcan, A. (2011). Public schools in Australia from the late 1970s to the late 1980s: The seeds of change. Education Research and Perspectives, 37(2), 1–37.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, J., & Clarke, J. (2013). Farewell to the tick box inspector: Ofsted and the changing regime of school inspection in England. Oxford Review of Education, 39(5), 702–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biesta, G. J. J. (2010). Good education in an age of measurement: Ethics, politics, democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  5. Blackmore, J. (2011). Bureaucratic, corporate/market and network governance: Shifting spaces for gender equity in education. Gender, Work & Organization, 18, 443–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne, P. (2016). A fair go? Reviewing schools and leaders. Retrieved http://www.sstuwa.org.au/news-home/2016/september/fair-go-reviewing-schools-and-leaders. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  7. Cowie, M., Taylor, D., & Croxford, L. (2007). ‘Tough, intelligent accountability’ in Scottish secondary schools and the role of standard tables and charts (STACS): A critical appraisal. Scottish Educational Review, 39(1), 29–50.Google Scholar
  8. Cuttance, P., Harman, G., Macpherson, R. J. S., Pritchard, A., & Smart, D. (1998). The politics of accountability in Australian education. Educational Policy, 12(1&2), 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701366207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Education and Training. (2008). School improvement and accountability framework. Western Australia: Department of Education and Training.Google Scholar
  11. Diem, S., & Young, M. (2015). Considering critical turns in research on educational leadership and policy. International Journal of Educational Management, 29(7), 838–850.Google Scholar
  12. Diem, S., Young, M. D., Welton, A. D., Mansfield, K. C., & Lee, P. L. (2014). The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(9), 1068–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Du, M., & Zhang, Q. (Ed.) (2013). Chinese schools get independent education inspectors, people’s daily. http://en.people.cn/203691/8408056.html. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  14. Duggan, M. (2009). School accountability in the Western Australian public education sector: Perceptions of leaders in the field. PhD Thesis: Murdoch University.Google Scholar
  15. Ehren, M., & Shackleton, N. (2016). Risk-based school inspections: Impact of targeted inspection approaches on Dutch secondary schools. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(4), 299–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9242-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehren, M., & Visscher, A. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 51–72.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehren, M., & Visscher, A. (2008). The relationship between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2008.00400.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Exley, S. (2014). Scrapping schools inspections is a bad idea, warns Finnish expert, tes connect. Retrieved https://www.tes.co.uk/news/school-news/breaking-news/scrapping-school-inspections-a-bad-idea-warns-finnish-expert. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  19. Franklyn, M. (2016). SSTUWA submission to the inquiry into the Department of Education’s IPS Initiative. Perth, WA: State School Teachers of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Gilbert, I. (2012). Foreword. In J. Beere (Ed.), The perfect Ofsted inspection: 2012 Ofsted framework. UK: Independent Thinking.Google Scholar
  21. Gobby, B. (2013). Enacting the independent public schools program in Western Australia. Issues in Educational Research, 23(1), 19–34.Google Scholar
  22. Grimley, J. (1986). Critical educational policy analysis: A discussion of perspectives. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2), 19–26.  https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.1986v11n2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoffman, N. (1994). Devolution of decision-making authority in the government school system of Western Australia: A report by the Ministerial Independent Assessment Group on Devolution. Perth, WA: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school. Maidenhead: McGrawHill and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hunt, B., Deacon, H., Harris, J., & Shuttleworth, D. (2015). [Name] senior high school: Performance study report. Expert Review Group (August 2015).Google Scholar
  26. Hutchings, M. (2015). Exam factories? The impact of accountability measures on children and young people. London, UK: Communications Department of the National Union of Teachers.Google Scholar
  27. Kimber, M., & Ehrich, L. C. (2011). The democratic deficit and school-based management in Australia. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Misich, T. (1996). Options for self managing schools in Western Australia: A discussion paper for WA school leaders. Report on New Zealand and Australian Principals’ experience and recommendations for self management by schools. A discussion document for the WA Primary Principal Association.Google Scholar
  29. Monje Herrero, F., & Onega Onega, J. (2006) The inspectorate of education of Spain, p. 1–22. Retrieved http://www.sici-inspectorates.eu/getattachment/1b37e769-a3d4-44d0-88f2-4f977e2b2a42. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  30. O’Neill, S. (2016). Department of Education annual report 2015–2016. Western Australia: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  31. O’Neill, S. (2017). Department of Education annual report 2016–2017. Western Australia: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Phillips, Y. (2012). The best and worst of WA schools. Sunday Times (online). Retrieved 25/08/2016 http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/the-best-and-worst-of-wa-schools/story-e6frg13u-1226347574382. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  33. Prunty, J. (1984). A critical reformulation of educational policy analysis. Victoria: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rata, E. (2014). The three stages of critical policy methodology: An example from curriculum analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 12(3), 347–358.  https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2014.12.3.347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sahlberg, P. (2012). Quality and equity in Finnish school. School Administrator, 69(8), 27–30.Google Scholar
  36. Shine, R. (2016). [Name of] school violence: Damning report finds inadequate leadership. ABC News Online. Retrieved 23/01/2017 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-07-20/damning-report-on-kalgoorlie-school-released/7646064. Accessed 28 February 2018.
  37. Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. State School Teachers of Western Australia (SSTUWA). (2012). Expert Review Group: School review process. Power Point presentation.Google Scholar
  39. Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Häkkinen, K., & Hämäläinen, S. (1998). External inspection or school self-evaluation? A comparative analysis of policy and practice in primary schools in England and Finland. British Educational Research Journal, 24(5), 539–556.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192980240504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Edith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations