Advertisement

Educational Research for Policy and Practice

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 17–38 | Cite as

Educational experiences of ELL educators: searching for instructional insights to promote ELL students’ learning

  • Ricardo LumbrearsJr.
  • William H. RupleyEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Sustained academic growth of the Mexican population in the public schools of the Rio Grande Valley of Texas has precipitated a need for new and innovative ways to effectively educate English-language learners (ELLs). In place of common external factors typically used such as attendance, socioeconomic status, and test scores to address ELL’s learning, this study uses the lived educational descriptions of ELL teachers, who were once ELL students, to mine for new instructional insights to promote ELL student learning. To that effect, discourse analysis was utilized to ascertain the identity(s) of ELL educators, who were once ELL students. The convergence of the N-Identity and I-Identity leads to a third, albeit just as important D-Identity that provides much needed insight for school directors, curriculum facilitators, administrators, and educators who teach ELL students every day.

Keywords

ELL Discourse Latino Identities Illustrative statements Culture Heritage Family Teaching effectiveness 

Supplementary material

10671_2017_9225_MOESM1_ESM.docx (144 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (docx 144 KB)

References

  1. Aldous, J. (2006). Family, ethnicity, and immigrant youth’s educational achievements. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1633–1637.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, M. (2013). Mexican students’ identities in their language use at a U.S. high school. Bilingual Research Journal, 36, 100–120.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.778920.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Block, N. (2011a). Perceived impact of two-way dual immersion programs on Latino students’ relationships in their families and communities. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 15(2), 235–257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.620079.Google Scholar
  5. Block, N. (2011b). The impact of two-way dual-immersion programs on initially English-dominant Latino students’ attitudes. Bilingual Research Journal: The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education, 34(2), 125–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.598059.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, L., & Durrheim, K. (2009). Different kinds of knowing: Generating qualitative data through mobile interviewing. Qualitative Inquiry, 15(5), 911–930.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800409333440.Google Scholar
  7. Chase, S. E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 421–434). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Chenail, R. J. (2011). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255–262.Google Scholar
  9. Choy, S. (2002). Nontraditional undergraduates: Findings from the Condition of Education 2002. (National Center for Education Statistics NCES-95-167). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002012.pdf.
  10. Cook, H. G., Boals, T., & Lundberg, T. (2011). Academic achievement for English learners: What can we reasonably expect? Phi Delta Kappan, 93(3), 66–69.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, E., & Kiss, A. (2011). Dealing with opposition: Uncomfortable moments in research. European Educational Research Journal, 10(2), 242–251.Google Scholar
  12. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  13. Cuban, L. (2001). How can I fix it? Finding solutions and managing dilemmas: An educator’s road map. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investigating quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.Google Scholar
  15. Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). A future worth of teaching for America. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(110), 730–736.Google Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L. & Bell, D. L. (1997). Teaching for high standards: What policy makers need to know and be able to do? National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future. Retrieved from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu.
  17. de la Piedra, M. T., & Araujo, B. (2012). Transfronterizo literacies and content in a dual language classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(6), 705–721.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.699949.Google Scholar
  18. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez, L. (2002). Telling stories about school: Using critical race and Latino critical theories to document Latina/Latino education and resistance. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 45–65.Google Scholar
  20. Fiano, D. A. (2013). Primary discourse and expressive oral language in a kindergarten student. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 61–84.Google Scholar
  21. Garrett, J. E., & Holcomb, S. (2005). Meeting the needs of immigrant students with limited English ability. International Education, 35(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (2014a). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gee, J. P. (2014b). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W. M., & Christian, D. (2006). Educating English language learners: A synthesis of research evidence. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Genishi, C. (1981). Language across the contexts of early childhood. Theory into Practice, 20(2), 109–115.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405848109542938.Google Scholar
  26. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–607.Google Scholar
  28. Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Harris, R. (2012). Caught between two languages; Middle-grades bilingual students present two challenges to schools: Teaching adequate English and increasingly tough academic content. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 78(2), 57–62.Google Scholar
  30. Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Literacy in Society, 11(1), 49–76.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500009039.Google Scholar
  31. Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  32. Holland, D., Lachiocotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Honavar, V. (2008). Teachers achieving ‘highly qualified’ status on the rise. Education Week. Retrieved from: http://edweek.org.
  34. Jinks, J., & Morgan, J. (1999). Children’s perceived academic self-efficacy: An inventory scale. The Clearing House, 72(4), 224–230.Google Scholar
  35. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (2002). Student achievement through professional development. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).Google Scholar
  36. Kao, G., & Tienda, M. (1998). Educational aspirations of minority youth. American Journal of Education, 106, 349–384.Google Scholar
  37. Karathanos, K. (2009). Exploring US mainstream teachers’ perspectives on use of the native language in instruction with English language learner students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(6), 615–633.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050802372760.Google Scholar
  38. Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, J. S., & Jeong, E. (2013). Korean-English dual language immersion: Perspectives of students, parents, and teachers. Language, Culture, and Curriculum, 26(1), 89–107.  https://doi.org/10.1080/079083318.2013.765890.Google Scholar
  40. Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 68–87). London, England: Continuum.Google Scholar
  41. Lichter, D., Qian, Z., & Crowley, M. L. (2005). Poverty and economic polarization among America’s minority and immigrant children. Ann Arbor, MI: National Poverty Center.Google Scholar
  42. Liggett, T. (2010). ‘A little bit marginalized’: The structural marginalization of English language teachers in urban and rural public schools. Teaching Education, 21(3), 217–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10476211003695514.Google Scholar
  43. Lindholm-Leary, K. (2012). Success and challenges in dual language education. Theory Into Practice, 51, 256–262.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.726053.Google Scholar
  44. Lindholm-Leary, K., & Block, N. (2010). Achievement in predominately low ses/Hispanic dual language schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 43–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902777546.Google Scholar
  45. Lindholm-Leary, K., & Hernandez, A. (2011). Achievement and language proficiency of Latino students in dual language programmes: Native English speakers, fluent English/previous ELLs, and current ELLs. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(6), 531–545.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2011.611596.Google Scholar
  46. Luster, J. (2011). A new protocol for teaching English language learners in middle and secondary schools. Journal of International Education Research, 7(4), 65–74.Google Scholar
  47. Melles, G. (2005). Beyond the romantic impulse for authentic data to coconstruction of meaning in interview-based educational research. Qualitative Research Journal, 5(2), 21–30.Google Scholar
  48. Mishler, E. (1986). Research interviews. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328.Google Scholar
  50. Neut, A. (2006). Hispanics in the US: Mobility with the US. Monitor Hispano. Retrieved from http://mediaserver.fxstreet.com/Reports/9c1b6d93-dd98-4fa6-b31a-4c881a171ed3/fab08094-62cb-4cb2-9fac-6028b70ac984.pdf.
  51. Ogbu, J. U. (1981). School ethnography: A multilevel approach. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 12(1), 3–29.Google Scholar
  52. Page, J. (2013). Hispanics: A diverse population of students to influence the landscape of higher education. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12(1), 37–48.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192712454133.Google Scholar
  53. Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Pawan, F., & Craig, D. A. (2011). ESL and content area teacher responses to discussions on English language learner instruction. TESOL Journal, 2(3), 293–311.Google Scholar
  55. Pennycock, A. (1998). English and the discourses of colonialism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Pizarro, M. (1999). “Adelante”: Toward social justice and empowerment in Chicana/o communities and Chicana/o studies. In L. Parker, D. Deyhle, & S. Villenas (Eds.), Race Is—Race isn’t: Critical race theory in qualitative studies in education (pp. 53–81). Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  58. Polat, B. (2013). Language experience interviews: What can they tell us about individual differences? System, 41(1), 70–83.Google Scholar
  59. Portes, A., & Rivas, A. (2011). The adaptation of Migrant children. The Future of Children, 21(1), 219–246.Google Scholar
  60. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social construction. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Quijada, D. A. (2006). Collegial alliances? Exploring one Chicano’s perspective on mentoring in research and academia. In J. Catellanos, A. M. Gloria, & M. Kamimura (Eds.), The Latina/o pathway to the Ph.D.: Abriendo caminos (pp. 255–268). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  62. Quintanar-Sarellana, R. (2004). Si se puede! Academic excellence and bilingual competency in a k-8 tow way dual immersion program. Journal of Latinos and Education, 3(2), 87–102.Google Scholar
  63. Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2006). Patterns of Hispanic students’ math and English literacy test scores in the early elementary grades. New York: National Task Force on Early Childhood Education for Hispanics.Google Scholar
  64. Reardon, S. F., & Galindo, C. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in Math and Reading in the elementary grades. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 853–891.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209333184.Google Scholar
  65. Rodriguez, M. A. (2012). “But they just can’t do it”: Reconciling teacher expectations of Latino students. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(25), 25–31.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458912442605.Google Scholar
  66. Rodriguez, D., Manner, J., & Darcy, S. (2010). Evolution of teacher perceptions regarding effective instruction for English language learners. Journal of Hispanic Higher education, 9(2), 130–144.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192709359423.Google Scholar
  67. Rodriguez, D., Ringler, M., O’Neal, D., & Bunn, K. (2009). English language learners’ perceptions of school environment. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 513–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540909594678.Google Scholar
  68. Romo, H. (1993). Mexican immigrants in high schools: Meeting their needs (ERIC Digest). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357-905).Google Scholar
  69. Rossman, G. B., & Rallis, S. F. (1998). Learning the field: An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Schachter, R. (2013). Are schools getting tongue-tied? ESL programs face new challenges. District Administration, 49, 57–60.Google Scholar
  71. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text, and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  72. Simon, H. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  73. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar
  74. Sue, C. A. (2011). Raceblindness in Mexico: Implications for teacher education in the United States. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(4), 537–559.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2010.547847.Google Scholar
  75. Telles, E., & Ortiz, V. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican Americans, assimilation, and race. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Texas Education Agency Adequate Yearly Progress Report—Physical Copy. Retrieved March 29, 2013.Google Scholar
  77. Texas Education Agency Public Education Grant (PEG) List—Physical Copy. Retrieved January 11, 2015.Google Scholar
  78. Texas Education Agency Snapshot Report—Physical Copy. Retrieved August 10, 2015.Google Scholar
  79. Urrieta, L. (2007). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. The Urban Review, 39(2), 107–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0051-0.Google Scholar
  80. Warhol, L., & Mayer, A. (2012). Misinterpreting school reform: The dissolution of a dual- immersion bilingual program in an urban New England elementary school. Bilingual Research Journal, 35, 145–163.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2012.703636.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tarleton State UniversityStephenvilleUSA
  2. 2.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations