On the Proper Treatment of the Churchlands
To a significant extent, mainstream Western philosophy is not empirically minded. The neurophilosophy of the Churchlands seems to exhibit the greatest divergence from this orientation by far. Extending and neuralizing Quine’s naturalism, the Churchlands have been known to challenge most assumptions and principles of contemporary mainstream analytic and even existing naturalistic philosophies. Even the philosophers who identify themselves as full-blown naturalists have an inexplicably negative attitude toward the Churchlands. For many philosophers of the mind, the Churchlands’ problem is not that they are philosophically wrong, but that they have no philosophical approach that could be wrong. They are nonphilosophers working at philosophy departments. Proper philosophy is not what they do or think they are doing. In this article, I argue to the contrary. The Churchlands would seem surprisingly moderate, and neither trivial nor near-trivial, when closely scrutinized.
- Bickle, J., Mandik, P., & Landreth, A. (2012). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 201). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/neuroscience/. Accessed 29 Mar 2019.
- Churchland, P. S. (1986a). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. M. (1988). Matter and consciousness: A contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind (Revised). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. M. (1994). Folk psychology (2). In S. Guttenplan (Ed.), A companion to the philosophy of mind (pp. 308–316). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. S. (2002). Brain-wise: Studies in neurophilosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. S. (2007). Neurophilosophy: The early years and new directions. Functional Neurology, 22(4), 185–195.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. S., & Churchland, P. M. (1996). Do we propose to eliminate consciousness? In R. N. McCauley (Ed.), The churchlands and their critics (pp. 297–300). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. M., & Churchland, P. S. (1998). Intertheoretic reduction: A neuroscientist’s field guide. In Y. Christen & P. Churchland (Eds.), Neurophilosophy and alzheimer’s disease (pp. 65–79). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1990). Making mind matter more. In A theory of content and other essays (pp. 137–159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- McGinn, C. (2014). Review of touching a nerve (storm over the brain). The New York Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/04/24/storm-over-the-brain/. Accessed 29 Mar 2019.
- Northoff, G. (2004b). What is neurophilosophy? A methodological account. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 35, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JGPS.0000035153.89143.4c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Northoff, G. (2014b). Unlocking the brain: Volume 1: Coding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Northoff, G. (2016). Neuro-philosophy of the healthy mind: Learning from the unwell brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Quine, W. V. O. (1948). On what there is. The Review of Metaphysics, 2(5), 21–38.Google Scholar