How Science and Semantics Settle the Issue of Natural Kind Essentialism
- 41 Downloads
Standard arguments for essentialism with respect to natural kinds such as gold, star, water or tiger enlist essentialist principles or essentialist intuitions. I argue that we need neither. All it takes to establish essentialism for the kinds in question are insights from science and semantics. Semantics establishes that natural kind predicates such as “is gold” or “is a star” are paradigm terms whose application conditions are relationally determined, object involving, and actuality dependent. Science assures us that a posteriori hypotheses such as “∀x(x is gold ↔ x is Au)” are deeply explanatory, as well as true. Taken together, these results establish essentialism for kinds such as gold, star, water or tiger. I consider this a deflationary result. When it comes to natural kind essentialism, there is no need for substantial metaphysics, be it essentialist or otherwise.
I would like to thank Tim Henning, Peter Schulte, Steven Kindley, Fabian Hundertmark, Martin Korth and audiences at Bielefeld, Tampere and Edinburgh for discussions of earlier versions of this paper. I am particularly indebted to two anonymous referees for Erkenntnis whose comments allowed me to substantially improve the argument.
- Angelo, J. (2006). Encyclopedia of space and astronomy. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
- Beebee, H., & Sabbarton-Leary, N. (Eds.). (2010). The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bird, A. (2009). Essences and natural kinds. In R. Le Poidevin (Ed.), The Routledge companion to metaphysics (pp. 497–506). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Bird, A. (2010). Discovering the essences of natural kinds. Beebee/Sabbarton-Leary, 2010, 125–136.Google Scholar
- Bird, A. (2018). The metaphysics of natural kinds. Synthèse, 195(4), 1397–1426.Google Scholar
- Bird, A., & Tobin, E. (2017). Natural kinds. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/natural-kinds/. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
- Corrigan, D. (2005). Gold. In G. D. Considine (Ed.), Van Nostrand’s Encyclopedia of Chemistry (pp. 735–737). Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
- Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Gimeno, M. C. (2008). The chemistry of gold. In A. Laguna (Ed.), Modern supramolecular gold chemistry: Gold–Metal interactions and applications (pp. 1–63). Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
- Hendry, R. F. (2010). The elements and conceptual change. Beebee/Sabbarton-Leary, 2010, 137–158.Google Scholar
- Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics: A defense of conceptual analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Johnson, B. F. G., & Davis, R. (1973). Gold. In J. C. Bailar, et al. (Eds.), Comprehensive inorganic chemistry (pp. 132–186). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. (1971). Identity and necessity. In M. Munitz (Ed.), Identity and individuation (pp. 135–164). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
- Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- LaPorte, J. (2004). Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Lowe, E. J. (2007). The four-category ontology: A metaphysical foundation for natural science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Mill, J. S. (1874). A system of logic ratiocinative and inductive part II. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The collected works of John Stuart Mill (Vol. 8). Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1963.Google Scholar
- Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Renner, H., & Johns, M. (2000). Gold, gold alloys, and gold compounds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, A12, 499–533.Google Scholar
- Robertson, T., & Atkins, P. (2016). Essential vs. accidental properties. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/essential-accidental/. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
- Salmon, N. (2005). Reference and essence (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Schulz, N. S. (2007). From dust to stars. Studies of the formation and early evolution of stars. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- Slater, M. H., & Borghini, A. (2013). Introduction: Lessons from the scientific butchery. In J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke, & M. H. Slater (Eds.), Carving nature at its joints (pp. 1–31). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar