Advertisement

A methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts and building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project: a case study of the Waterloo County Courthouse renovations

  • Benjamin SanchezEmail author
  • Mansour Esnaashary Esfahani
  • Carl Haas
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Adaptive reuse of buildings is considered a superior alternative for the renewal of today’s built environment. However, little research has been done for assessing adaptive reuse building projects in terms of life cycle and Circular Economy. Because of the great impact that the building industry has on the environment, failing to optimize buildings’ useful life can result in their residual life cycle expectancy not being fully exploited, and with it, wasting the resources embedded therein, such as Primary Energy Demand. The aim of this study is to develop and test a methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts as well as the building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project. This paper focuses on the analysis of the structural system. Results show that the adaptive reuse of the building structure produces a considerable decrease in the environmental impacts and the construction building cost. Distribution of cost among materials and equipment is different from those for a new building, while the distribution cost for labor remains the similar. This study objectively demonstrates the considerable benefits of the adaptive reuse of the structure of an existing asset. In contrast, the non-structural building subsystems have been identified as an area with high potential for improving the existing inefficiencies during the adaptive reuse process.

Keywords

Adaptive reuse Life cycle assessment Circular economy Net environmental impact Environmental savings Primary energy demand 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the energy Council of Canada (ECC) and the Waterloo Institute for Sustainable Energy (WISE) for providing support for this research paper.

References

  1. Aigwi IE, Egbelakin T, Ingham J (2018) Efficacy of adaptive reuse for the redevelopment of underutilised historical buildings: towards the regeneration of New Zealand’s provincial town centres. Int J Build Pathol Adapt 36(4):385–407.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-01-2018-0007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asdrubali F, Baldassarri C, Fthenakis V (2013) Life cycle analysis in the construction sector: guiding the optimization of conventional Italian buildings. Energy Build 64:73–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azari R, Abbasabadi N (2018) Embodied energy of buildings: a review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends. Energy Build 168:225–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball R (1999) Developers, regeneration and sustainability issues in the reuse of vacant industrial buildings. Build Res Inf 27(3):140–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/096132199369480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beccali M, Cellura M, Fontana M et al (2013) Energy retrofit of a single-family house: life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits. Renew Sust Energy Rev 27:283–293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blengini GA, Di Carlo T (2010) The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy Build 42(6):869–880.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.12.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boyko CT, Davey CL, Cooper R et al (2006) Addressing sustainability early in the urban design process. Manag Environ Qual 17(6):689–706.  https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830610702520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullen PA (2007) Adaptive reuse and sustainability of commercial buildings. Facilities 25(1/2):20–31.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710716911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cabeza LF, Rincon L, Vilarino V et al (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renew Sust Energy Rev 29:394–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canadian Industrial Energy End‐use Data and Analysis Centre (CIEEDAC) (2016) CIEEDAC Database on Energy, Production and Intensity Indicators for Canadian Industry. http://naicsdb.rem.sfu.ca/CIEEDACweb/mod.php?mod=NAICSPublic&menu=1602. Accessed 15 July 2016
  11. Cantell SF (2005) The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: regulation barriers, best practices and case studies. Master dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  12. Chastas P, Theodosiou T, Bikas D (2016) Embodied energy in residential buildings-towards the nearly zero energy building: a literature review. Build Environ 105:267–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conejos S (2013) Designing for future building adaptive reuse. Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Sustainable Development and Architecture, Bond UniversityGoogle Scholar
  14. Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2011) Improving the implementation of adaptive reuse strategies for historic buildingsGoogle Scholar
  15. Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2013) AdaptSTAR model: a climate-friendly strategy to promote built environment sustainability. Habitat Int 37:95–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2014) Designing for better building adaptability: a comparison of adaptSTAR and ARP models. Habitat Int 41:85–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2013.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conejos S, Langston C, Smith J (2015) Enhancing sustainability through designing for adaptive reuse from the outset: a comparison of adaptstar and adaptive reuse potential (ARP) models. Facilities 33(9–10):531–552.  https://doi.org/10.1108/F-02-2013-0011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conejos S, Langston C, Chan EHW et al (2016) Governance of heritage buildings: australian regulatory barriers to adaptive reuse. Build Res Inf 44(5–6):507–519.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1156951 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Construction Industry Institute (CII) (2014) IR242-2—Front end planning of renovation and revamp projects Version 1.1Google Scholar
  20. Esther Yakubu I, Egbelakin T, Dizhur D et al (2017) Why are older inner-city buildings vacant? Implications for town centre regeneration. J Urban Regener Renew 11(1):44–59Google Scholar
  21. Hein MF, Houck KD (2008) Construction challenges of adaptive reuse of historical buildings in Europe. Int J Constr Educ Res 4(2):115–131.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15578770802229466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Highfield D, Gorse C (2009) Refurbishment and upgrading of buildings, 2nd, ed edn. Taylor & Francis Group, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huovila P (2007) Buildings and climate change: status, challenges, and opportunities. UNEP/EarthprintGoogle Scholar
  24. Intergovernamental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2015) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1997) ISO 14040 Environmental Management—Life cycle Assessment—Principles and FrameworkGoogle Scholar
  27. Jalaei F (2015) Integrate Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Sustainable Design at the Conceptual Stage of Building Projects. Doctoral Dissertation, University of OttawaGoogle Scholar
  28. Jalaei F, Jrade A (2014) An automated BIM model to conceptually design, analyze, simulate, and assess sustainable building projects. J Constr Eng 2014:672896.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/672896 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. KT Innovations® (2015) Tally Methods. http://www.choosetally.com/methods/. Accessed 15 July 2016
  30. KT Innovations®, Thinkstep®, Autodesk® (2019) Tally—methods. https://choosetally.com/methods/. Accessed 8 May 2019
  31. Kibert CJ (2007) The next generation of sustainable construction. Build Res Inf 35(6):595–601.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701467040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kokkos A (2014) Computational Modelling tools for the promotion of Design for Deconstruction. Master dissertation, Delft University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  33. Langston C (2008) The sustainability implications of building adaptive reuse. In: Feng C, Yu M, Zhao Z (eds) CRIOCM 2008 international research symposium on advancement of construction management and real estate, Beijing, China, October 31–November 3, 2008, vol 8. Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  34. Langston C, Shen L (2007) Application of the adaptive reuse potential model in Hong Kong: a case study of Lui Seng Chun. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 11(4):193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1648715X.2007.9637569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Langston C, Wong FKW, Hui ECM et al (2008) Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Build Environ 43(10):1709–1718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Larkham P (2002) Conservation and the City. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu B, Wang D, Xu Y et al (2018) Embodied energy consumption of the construction industry and its international trade using multi-regional input–output analysis. Energy Build 173:489–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Love P, Bullen P (2011) A new future for the past: a model for adaptive reuse decision-making. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 1(1):32–44.  https://doi.org/10.1108/20441241111143768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matthews J, Dyson K, Love PED (2016) Critical success factors of adapting heritage buildings: an exploratory study. Built Environ Proj Asset Manag 6(1):44–57.  https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2015-0002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mohamed R, Boyle R, Yang AY et al (2017) Adaptive reuse: a review and analysis of its relationship to the 3 Es of sustainability. Facilities 35(3/4):138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1108/F-12-2014-0108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moncaster AM, Pomponi F, Symons KE et al (2018) Why method matters: temporal, spatial and physical variations in LCA and their impact on choice of structural system. Energy Build 173:389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.05.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. National Energy Board (2016) Commodity Prices and Trade Updates. https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd/mrkt/prcstrdrtcl/index-eng.html?pedisable=true. Accessed 15 July 2016
  43. Natural Resources Canada (2016) Transportation Fuel Prices. http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/fuel-prices/4593. Accessed 15 July 2016
  44. Peuportier B (2001) Life cycle assessment applied to the comparative evaluation of single family houses in the French context. Energy Build 33(5):443–450.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(00)00101-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pinard A, Wade M (2012) Listing of non-designated properties of cultural heritage value or interest on the municipal heritage register CSD-12-036Google Scholar
  46. RSMeans (2013) Building Construction Cost Data, 71st ed. edn. R.S. Means Company, Inc, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  47. Sanchez B, Haas C (2018a) Capital project planning for a circular economy. Constr Manag Econ 36(6):303–312.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sanchez B, Haas C (2018b) A novel selective disassembly sequence planning method for adaptive reuse of buildings. J Clean Prod 183:998–1010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanstrom M (2014) Life cycle assessment of construction materials: the influence of assumptions in end-of-life modelling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):723–731.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0686-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schultmann F, Sunke N (2007) Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Build Res Inf 35(6):602–615.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210701431210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shindell DT (2015) The social cost of atmospheric release. Clim Change 130(2):313–326.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1343-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shipley R, Utz S, Parsons M (2006) Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada. Int J Herit Stud 12(6):505–520.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600940181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sugden E (2018) The Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage Buildings: A Multiple-Case Studies Approach. Master’s thesis, University of WaterlooGoogle Scholar
  54. Tan Y, Shen L, Langston C (2014) A fuzzy approach for adaptive reuse selection of industrial buildings in Hong Kong. Int J Strateg Prop Manag 18(1):66–76.  https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.864718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Unalan B, Tanrivermis H, Bulbul M et al (2016) Impact of embodied carbon in the life cycle of buildings on climate change for a sustainable future. Int J Hous Sci Appl 40(1):61–71Google Scholar
  56. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2016) Sustainable Buildings and Climate Initiative. http://www.unep.org/sbci/AboutSBCI/Background.asp. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
  57. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017) Tool for Reduction and Assessment of Chemicals and Other Environmental Impacts (TRACI). https://www.epa.gov/chemical-research/tool-reduction-and-assessment-chemicals-and-other-environmental-impacts-traci. Accessed 8 May 2019 2015
  58. Van Ast L, Maclean R, Sireyjol A (2013) White paper: Valuing water to drive more effective decisions. Truecost PLC white paperGoogle Scholar
  59. Vilches A, Garcia-Martinez A, Sanchez-Montañes B (2017) Life cycle assessment (LCA) of building refurbishment: a literature review. Energy Build 135:286–301.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.11.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Viscusi WK (2005) Monetizing the benefits of risk and environmental regulation. Fordham Urban Law J 33(4):1003Google Scholar
  61. Wilkinson SJ, James K, Reed R (2009) Using building adaptation to deliver sustainability in Australia. Struct Surv 27(1):46–61.  https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800910941683 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson C (2010) Adaptive reuse of industrial buildings in Toronto, Ontario: evaluating criteria for determining building selection. Master dissertation, School of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen’s UniversityGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu W, Issa RRA (2015) An integrated green BIM process model (IGBPM) for BIM execution planning in green building projects. In: Issa RRA, Olbina S (eds) Building information modeling: applications and practices. American society of civil engineers (ASCE), Reston, p 135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yeung J (2016) Development of Analysis Tools for the Facilitation of Increased Structural Steel Reuse. Doctoral dissertation, UWSpaceGoogle Scholar
  65. Yeung J, Walbridge S, Haas C et al (2017) Understanding the total life cycle cost implications of reusing structural steel. Environ Syst Decis 37(1):101–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9621-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yudelson J (2009) Greening existing buildings. New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  67. Yung EHK, Chan EHW (2012) Implementation challenges to the adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: towards the goals of sustainable, low carbon cities. Habitat Int 36(3):352–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zabalza Bribian I, Aranda Uson A, Scarpellini S (2009) Life cycle assessment in buildings: state-of-the-art and simplified LCA methodology as a complement for building certification. Build Environ 44(12):2510–2520.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.05.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations