Using social–ecological inventory and group model building for resilience assessment to climate change in a network governance setting: a case study from Ikel watershed in Moldova

  • Natalia CiobanuEmail author
  • Ali Kerem Saysel
Case study


Climate change risks threaten social–ecological systems (SESs) across the globe. Efforts are increasingly focusing on reducing vulnerabilities of SES to climate change. Scientists and practitioners of resilience assessment have been developing frameworks to conduct integrated analyses of social–ecological systems. Such frameworks would ideally lead to a stronger commitment of various groups of stakeholders to act toward building the resilience of the system in focus. In this context, we explore and present in this paper how two sequential processes: social–ecological inventory (SEI) and group model building (GMB) have been employed to assess the resilience to climate change of Ikel watershed in the Republic of Moldova. The two processes come from two related fields: resilience and system dynamics. They have many things in common, but have not been combined much in the literature thus far. The methodology is being applied in two stages: for identifying vulnerabilities and for building the conceptual model. We find that SEI and GMB can be used together smoothly, adding value to both system dynamicists and resilience practitioners. We conclude that SEI is a valuable addition to GMB by enhancing stakeholder engagement for resilience building in a network governance setting. Similarly, employment of the GMB practice and vocabulary added value to resilience assessment by providing a conceptual dynamic feedback model. This conceptual model can be further built upon to develop a computer simulation model for testing of various policy options. The paper offers resilience practitioners an approach for participatory resilience assessment and the system dynamicists an approach for GMB practice in network governance settings.


Social–ecological inventory Resilience assessment System dynamics Group model building Stakeholder engagement Network governance 



We gratefully acknowledge the Boğaziçi University Research Fund Project No: 11925, and the Climate Forum East II program for funding parts of this work. We are especially thankful to the many SEI and GMB participants, local organizations, institutions, and individuals from the Republic of Moldova for their pioneering spirit, tireless support, and dedication to help advance this research. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers for valuable comments.


  1. Abbott, P. (2007). Cultural trauma and social quality in Post—Soviet Moldova and Belarus. East European Politics and Societies, 21(2), 219–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen, D., & Richardson, G. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review,13(2), 107–129.;2-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen, D., Richardson, G., & Vennix, J. (1997). Group model building: adding more science to the craft. System Dynamics Review,13(2), 187–201.;2-O.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bahauddin, K., Rahman, N., & Hasnine, M. (2016). Environmental reviews and case studies: Public perception, knowledge, and participation in climate change adaptation governance in the coastal region of Bangladesh using the social ecological inventory (SEI) tool. Environmental Practice,18(1), 32–43. Scholar
  5. Baird, J., Plummer, R., & Pickering, K. (2014). Priming the governance system for climate change adaptation: the application of a social-ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society,19(1), 3. Scholar
  6. Baird, J., Plummer, R., Schultz, L., Armitage, D., & Bodin, Ӧ. (2018). Integrating conservation and sustainable development through adaptive Co-management in UNESCO biosphere reserves. Conservation and Society 16(4), 409–419. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  7. Barnett, J. (2001). Adapting to climate change in Pacific Island countries: the problem of uncertainty. World Development,29(6), 977–993. Scholar
  8. Barnett, J., & O’Neill, S. (2010). Maladaptation. Global Environmental Change,20, 211–213. Scholar
  9. Biggs, R., Gordon, L. J., Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Schlüter, M., & Walker, B. (2015). Principle 3 manage slow variables and feedbacks. In R. Biggs, M. Schlüter, & M. L. Schoon (Eds.), Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems (pp. 105–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd, E., Nykvist, B., Borgström, S., & Stacewicz, I. A. (2015). Anticipatory governance for social-ecological resilience. Ambio,44(S1), 149–161. Scholar
  11. Carlsson, L., & Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons 2(1), 33–54. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  12. Carpenter, S. R., & Scheffer, M. (2009). Critical transitions and regime shifts in ecosystems: Consolidating recent advances. In R. J. Hobbs & K. N. Suding (Eds.), New models for ecosystem dynamics and restoration (pp. 22–32). Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ciobanu, N. (2016). Local climate change adaptation plan for Ichel watershed 2020. Millenium Training and Development Institute and Climate Forum East II. Accessed 15 May 2017.
  14. Clark, J. B., & McArthur, D. (2014). The Political and Economic Transition from Communism and the Global Sex Trafficking Crisis: A Case Study of Moldova. Journal of Intercultural Studies,35(2), 128–144. Scholar
  15. Duelli, P., & Obrist, M. K. (2003). Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,98(1–3), 87–98. Scholar
  16. Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance 21(3), 311–335. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  17. Ecological Society BIOTICA. (2017). Empowering communities to adapt to climate change. Case studies. Climate Forum East II and Moldova National Network on Climate Change. Accessed 5 March 2018.
  18. Enfors, E. (2013). Social–ecological traps and transformations in dryland agro-ecosystems: Using water system innovations to change the trajectory of development. Global Environmental Change,23(1), 51–60. Scholar
  19. Enfors-Kautsky, E., Järnberg, L., Quinlan, A., & Ryan, P. (2018). Wayfinder: A resilience guide for navigating towards sustainable futures. GRAID programme, Stockholm Resilience Center. Accessed 29 December 2018.
  20. Ernstson, H., Barthel, S., Andersson, E., & Borgström, S.T. (2010). Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15(4), 28. Accessed on 2 January 2019.
  21. Fidrmuc, J. (2003). Economic reform, democracy and growth during post-communist transition. European Journal of Political Economy,19, 583–604. Scholar
  22. Giest, S., & Howlett, M. (2014). Understanding the pre-conditions of commons governance: The role of network management. Environmental Science & Policy,36, 37–47. Scholar
  23. Gordon, L.J., & Enfors, E.I. (2008). Land degradation, ecosystem services and resilience of smallholder farmers in Makanya catchment, Tanzania. IWMI Books. Reports. No H041592. International Water Management Institute. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  24. Groesser, S., & Schwaninger, M. (2012). Contributions to model validation: hierarchy, process, and cessation. System Dynamics Review,28(2), 157–181. Scholar
  25. Hamm, P., King, L. P., & Stuckler, D. (2012). Mass privatization, state capacity, and economic growth in post-communist countries. American Sociological Review,77(2), 295–324. Scholar
  26. Herrera, H. (2017). From metaphor to practice: Operationalizing the analysis of resilience using system dynamics modelling. Systems Research and Behavioral Science,34(4), 444–462. Scholar
  27. Herrera, H., & Kopainsky, B. (2015) Rethinking agriculture in a shrinking world: Operationalization of resilience with a system dynamics perspective. In Proceedings of the 33rd international conference of the system dynamics society, Cambridge, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Hovmand, P. S., Rouwette, E., Andersen, D.F., Richardson, G.P., Calhoun, A., Rux, K., & Hower, T. (2011). Scriptapedia 3.04. Accessed 5 March 2015.
  29. Ikel Watershed Committee. (2016). Minutes of the Ikel Watershed Committee held on August 18, 2016. Accessed 15 September 2016.
  30. Inam, A., Adamowski, J., Halbe, J., & Prasher, J. (2015). Using causal loop diagrams for the initialization of stakeholder engagement in soil salinity management in agricultural watersheds in developing countries: A case study in the Rechna Doab watershed, Pakistan. Journal of Environmental Management,152, 251–267. Scholar
  31. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 911–945. Scholar
  32. Juhola, S., & Westerhoff, L. (2011). Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environmental Science & Policy,14(3), 239–247. Scholar
  33. Korhonen, J., & Seager, T. P. (2008). Beyond eco-efficiency: A resilience perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment,17(7), 411–419. Scholar
  34. Lyashevska, O., & Farnsworth, K. D. (2012). How many dimensions of biodiversity do we need? Ecological Indicators,18, 485–492. Scholar
  35. Maru, Y., O’Connell, D., Grigg, N., Abel, N., Cowie, A., Stone-Jovicich, S., Butler, J., Wise, R., Walker, B., Million, A.B., Fleming, A., Meharg, S., & Meyers, J. (2017). Making ‘resilience’, ‘adaptation’ and ‘transformation’ real for the design of sustainable development projects: piloting the Resilience, Adaptation Pathways and Transformation Assessment (RAPTA) framework in Ethiopia.
  36. McEvoy, J., & Wilder, M. (2012). Discourse and desalination: Potential impacts of proposed climate change adaptation interventions in the Arizona-Sonora border region. Global Environmental Change,22(2), 353–363. Scholar
  37. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry. (2013). Moldova’s Agriculture and Rural Development Strategy for 2014–2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Food Industry of the Republic of Moldova. Chisinau, R. Moldova. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  38. Ministry of Environment. (2013). Third National Communication of the Republic of Moldova under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Environment Programme. Chisinau, R. Moldova. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  39. Ministry of Environment. (2014). The Republic of Moldova’s Climate Change Adaptation Strategy by 2020. Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Moldova. Chisinau, R. Moldova. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  40. Moldovan National Bank. (2019). 2018 Annual Report. Accessed 29 October 2019.
  41. Moser, D., Zechmeister, H. G., Plutzar, C., Sauberer, N., Wrbka, T., & Grabherr, G. (2002). Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecology,17, 657–669. Scholar
  42. Nabavi, E., Daniell, K. A., & Najafi, H. (2017). Boundary matters: The potential of system dynamics to support sustainability? Journal of Cleaner Production,140, 312–323. Scholar
  43. National Environmental Centre. (2015). Recent a fost constituit Comitetul subbazinal al rîului Ichel. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  44. Neuwirth, C., Peck, A., & Simonović, S. P. (2015). Modeling structural change in spatial system dynamics: A Daisyworld example. Environmental Modelling and Software,65, 30–40. Scholar
  45. O’Connel, D., Walker, B., Abel, N., & Grigg, N. (2015) The resilience, adaptation and transformation assessment framework: From theory to application. Australia: CSIRO. Accessed 23 May 2018.
  46. Ostadtaghizadeh, A., Ardalan, A., Paton, D., Jabbari, H., & Khankeh, H. R. (2015). Community disaster resilience: A systematic review on assessment models and tools. PLoS Currents. Scholar
  47. Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review,100(3), 641–672. Scholar
  48. Ouborg, M. J. (2015) Formalizing group model building. The next step in supporting Group Decision Making. Bachelor Thesis. Nijmegen: Radboud University Institute for Computing and Information Sciences.Google Scholar
  49. Pittman, J., & Aritage, D. (2017). How does network governance affect social-ecological fit across the land–sea interface? An empirical assessment from the Lesser Antilles. Ecology and Society,22(4), 5. Scholar
  50. Renaud, F. G., Birkmann, J., Damm, M., & Callopín, G. C. (2010). Understanding multiple thresholds of coupled social–ecological systems exposed to natural hazards as external shocks. Natural Hazards,55(3), 749–763. Scholar
  51. Resilience Alliance. (2007). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: A workbook for scientists. Version 1.1. Resilience Alliance, Stockholm, Sweden. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  52. Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: workbook for practitioners. Revised version 2.0. Resilience Alliance, Stockholm, Sweden. Accessed 5 May 2015.
  53. Resilience Alliance. (2019). Resilience. Accessed 29 October 2019.
  54. Rouwette, E. (2003). Group model building as mutual persuasion. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Rouwette, E., Vennix, J., & van Mullekom, T. (2002). Group model building effectiveness: A review of assessment studies. System Dynamics Review,18(1), 5–45. Scholar
  56. Sârbu, O. (2013). Economic and social aspects of the demographic ageing process in the Republic of Moldova. Scientific Papers, UASVM Bucharest. Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development,13(1), 352–360.Google Scholar
  57. Saysel, A. K., Barlas, Y., & Yenigün, O. (2002). Environmental sustainability in an agricultural development project: A system dynamics approach. Journal of Environmental Management,64(3), 247–260. Scholar
  58. Scarlett, L., & McKinney, M. (2016). Connecting people and places: The emerging role of network governance in large landscape conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,14(3), 116–125. Scholar
  59. Schultz, L., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation,34, 140–152. Scholar
  60. Schultz, L., Plummer, R., & Purdy, S. (2011). Applying a social-ecological inventory: A workbook for finding the key actors and engaging them. Resilience Alliance. Accessed 10 February 2018.
  61. Schwaninger, M., & Groesser, S. (2018). System dynamics modeling: Validation for quality assurance. In R. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Berlin: Springer. Scholar
  62. Scott, R. J. (2019). Explaining how group model building supports enduring agreement. Journal of Management and Organization,25(6), 783–806. Scholar
  63. Scott, R. J., Cavana, R. Y., & Cameron, D. (2016). Recent evidence on the effectiveness of group model building. European Journal of Operational Research,249(3), 908–918. Scholar
  64. Sellberg, M. M., Borgström, S. T., Norström, A. V., & Peterson, G. D. (2017). Improving participatory resilience assessment by cross-fertilizing the resilience alliance and transition movement approaches. Ecology and Society,22(1), 28. Scholar
  65. Sellberg, M. M., Wilkinson, C., & Peterson, G. D. (2015). Resilience assessment: A useful approach to navigate urban sustainability challenges. Ecology and Society,20(1), 43. Scholar
  66. Sharifi, A. (2016). A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience. Ecological Indicators,69, 629–647. Scholar
  67. Stave, K. A. (2003). A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. Journal of Environmental Management,67(4), 303–313. Scholar
  68. Stemmer, A. (2011) The Republic of Moldova and the migration: Migration and its risks and opportunities for the European Union. Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung International Reports. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  69. Stephens, P. A., Pettorelli, N., Barlow, J., Whittingham, M. J., & Cadotte, M. W. (2015). Management by proxy? The use of indices in applied ecology. Journal of Applied Ecology,52(1), 1–6. Scholar
  70. Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review,10(2–3), 291–330. Scholar
  71. Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Boston: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  72. Sterman, J. D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review,43(4), 8–25. Scholar
  73. Stockholm Resilience Centre. (2017). Resilience dictionary. Stockholm: Stockholm Resilience Centre. Accessed 20 December 2017.
  74. Suding, K. N., & Hobbs, R. J. (2009). Models of ecosystem dynamics as frameworks for restoration ecology. In R. J. Hobbs & K. N. Suding (Eds.), New models for ecosystem dynamics and restoration (pp. 3–21). Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  75. Tenza, A., Pérez, I., Martínez-Fernández, J., & Giménez, A. (2017). Understanding the decline and resilience loss of a long-lived social-ecological system: Insights from system dynamics. Ecology and Society,22(2), 15. Scholar
  76. Thomsen, D., Smith, T. F., & Keys, N. (2012). Adaptation or manipulation? Unpacking climate change response strategies. Ecology and Society,17(3), 20. Scholar
  77. Turner, B. L., Menendez, H. M., Gates, R., Tedeschi, L. O., & Atzori, A. S. (2016). System dynamics modeling for agricultural and natural resource management issues: Review of some past cases and forecasting future roles. Resources,5(40), 1–24. Scholar
  78. Underdal, A. (2010). Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Global Environmental Change. Scholar
  79. United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Human development report 2016: Human Development for Everyone. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  80. United Nations Development Programme in Moldova. (2009). Schimbările climatice în Republica Moldova: Impactul socio-economic şi opţiunile de politici pentru adaptare. Accessed 3 January 2019.
  81. United Nations University Institute for the Advanced Study of Sustainability, Bioversity International, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies and United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Toolkit for the Indicators of Resilience in Socio-ecological Production Landscapes and Seascapes (SEPLS). Bioversity International/Dunja Mijatovic. Accessed 15 June 2016.
  82. Ursu, L. (2014). Structura Peisagistica a Bazinului Riului Ichel. Master Thesis. Chisinau: University of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova, Faculty of Natural Sciences.Google Scholar
  83. van den Belt, M. (2004). Mediated modeling: A system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar
  84. Vennix, J. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Vennix, J. (1999). Group model-building: Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review,15, 379–401.;2-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vennix, J. (2009). Group model building. In Y. Barlas (Ed.), System dynamics (Vol. II). Oxford: EOLSS Publications/UNESCO.Google Scholar
  87. Walker, B., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Environmental SciencesBoğaziçi UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations