Advertisement

Transformation of social environment in the application of alternative energy sources

  • Ivan A. KapitonovEmail author
Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Alternative energy in the social environment changes several parameters that can be interpreted as a process of changing the social and economic environment. In the article, the authors define indicator parameters that show the dynamics of changing the social and economic formation on the example of accompanying changes. The authors identify that alternative energy not only determines the change of social and behavioral patterns, but also completely reformats methods and forms of applying technologies in the social environment. The article describes the changes that various markets experience when applying alternative energy methods to determine the criteria for variability. The novelty of the research is determined by the fact that for the first time in the scientific environment, a modeling method is applied affecting not only the forecast of changes in the state of a regional or local market. It also shows the possibilities of technology transfer in the nonindustrial sector related to the social environment. In particular, the labor market is socially oriented, which in the process of applying the alternative energy sector not only will be changed according to principles of applying socially oriented technologies, but uses modern methods of technological development for evolution of the social environment. The practical application of the developed technology for monitoring the social environment can be represented in programs of social and economic forecasting of territories where alternative energy is used.

Keywords

Alternative energy Use of technology Market Transfer Social environment 

Notes

References

  1. Annicchiarico, B., & Cesaroni, C. (2018). Tax reforms and the underground economy: A simulation-based analysis. International Tax and Public Finance,25(2), 458–518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9450-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antipova, E. A., Zhigalskaya, L. O., Rodionova, I. A., & Chernyaev, M. V. (2017). Spatio-temporal dynamics of the electric power industry development in European countries. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism,8(5), 1101–1114.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, O. J., Jaumotte, F., & Loungani, P. (2014). Labor market policies and IMF advice in advanced economies during the great recession. IZA Journal of Labor Policy,3(1), 2.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-3-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondar, O. (2018). Public administration in the field of land use and protection and state land policy in Ukraine: problems of correlation. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(3), 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardi, O., & Restout, R. (2014). Unanticipated vs. anticipated tax reforms in a two-sector open economy. Open Economies Review,25(2), 373–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-013-9285-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, J. (2016). Liberalize or not? Societal conflict, plural political competition, and the political economy of FDI liberalization. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences,9(1), 147–175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0104-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delogu, M., Docquier, F., & Machado, J. (2018). Globalizing labor and the world economy: The role of human capital. Journal of Economic Growth,23(2), 223–258.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-017-9153-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fedchyshyn, D., & Ignatenko, I. (2018). Protection of land ownership of foreigners in Ukraine. Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Jurídica, 8, 27–38.Google Scholar
  9. Furman, J. (2017). What is the potential growth rate of the US Economy, and how might policy affect it? Business Economics,52(3), 158–167.  https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-017-0041-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishioro, B. (2018). Energy consumption and performance of sectoral outputs: Results from an energy-impoverished economy. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism,9(7), 1539–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaeck, L., & Sehjeong, K. (2018). FDI deregulation versus labor market reform: A political economy approach. Atlantic Economic Journal,46(1), 73–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-018-9570-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jayanth, M. (2015). Human rights and labor solidarity: Trade unions in the global economy by Susan L. Kang. Human Rights Review,16(3), 313–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-015-0367-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuznetsova, E. L., & Makarenko, A. V. (2018). Mathematic simulation of energy-efficient power supply sources for mechatronic modules of promising mobile objects. Periodico Tche Quimica,15(Special Issue 1), 330–338.Google Scholar
  14. Lebon, I., & Rebière, T. (2018). How many educated workers for your economy? European targets, optimal public spending, and labor market impact. Portuguese Economic Journal,17(1), 1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-018-0142-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McKeehan, M. K., & Zodrow, G. R. (2017). Balancing act: Weighing the factors affecting the taxation of capital income in a small open economy. International Tax and Public Finance,24(1), 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-016-9414-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Milovanovich, E. V., & Maksimova, S. N. (2017). Modelling of microbiological method of oil recovery improvement. Periodico Tche Quimica,14(27), 56–62.Google Scholar
  17. Pirogov, S. P., & Cherentsov, D. A. (2018). Scientific research using the application software package MATLAB. Periodico Tche Quimica,15(30), 556–562.Google Scholar
  18. Pogosov, I. A., & Sokolovskaya, E. A. (2015). Factors of long-term economic growth: Ratio of capital and labor in the increase in the gross income of the economy, number of employed individuals, and labor productivity. Studies on Russian Economic Development,26(6), 525–533.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700715060088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosa, M. S. L., Nunes, L. A. O., Silva, I. B. C. L., Figueiredo, F. C., & Santos Junior, J. R. D. (2017). Biorremediation of emerging pollutants with the use of structured materials. Periodico Tche Quimica,14(28), 88–104.Google Scholar
  20. Russ, M. (2017). The trifurcation of the labor markets in the networked, knowledge-driven, global economy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,8(2), 672–703.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-016-0434-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Son, C.-B., Jang, W.-S., & Lee, D.-E. (2014). Effect of changes in the construction economy on worker’s operating rates and productivity. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering,18(2), 419–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0125-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Strobel, T. (2014). Directed technological change, skill complementarities and sectoral productivity growth: Evidence from industrialized countries during the new economy. Journal of Productivity Analysis,42(3), 255–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-014-0405-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Syed, I. U. (2016). Labor exploitation and health inequities among market migrants: A political economy perspective. Journal of International Migration and Integration,17(2), 449–465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-015-0427-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tyrowicz, J., Makarski, K., & Bielecki, M. (2016). Reforming retirement age in DB and DC pension systems in an aging OLG economy with heterogenous agents. IZA Journal of Labor Policy,5(1), 8.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40173-016-0067-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Uzyakova, E. S. (2015). Analysis and forecasting of employment and labor costs on the Russian economy. Studies on Russian Economic Development,26(4), 359–367.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700715040127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vollrath, D. (2013). Measuring aggregate agricultural labor effort in dual economies. Eurasian Economic Review,3(1), 39–58.  https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, Z., & Youn, H. (2017). Repress or respect? Precarious leadership, poor economy and labor protection. Human Rights Review,18(1), 21–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-016-0428-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yanase, A., & Tawada, M. (2017). Public infrastructure for production and international trade in a small open economy: A dynamic analysis. Journal of Economics,121(1), 51–73.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-016-0519-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre of Tariff Regulation in the Energy SectorPlekhanov Russian University of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation
  2. 2.Department of Energy PolicyInstitute of Economics of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations