Building sustainability in the Eastern Himalaya: linking evidence to action
- 40 Downloads
Operating at the science, policy, practice interface (SPPI) is often contentious, as knowledge creators and end-users seldom engage, preferring to operate in their own worlds. The application of science to solve sustainability challenges has not received the desired attention, especially in developing countries. How to strengthen the credibility, relevance and legitimacy of research so as to enhance the chances of uptake in decision making? How to generate knowledge differently, so that it is more likely to bring about change and benefit society? The purpose of this research is to examine these questions in the context of three sustainability case studies that were able to transcend the knowledge action barrier. These case studies are from the global biodiversity hot spot of Eastern Himalaya, India, and cover the themes of sustainability of pastoral systems, promoting sustainable livelihoods for the poor and co-designing a Himalayan spring revival initiative. The findings are structured to highlight how the demand for science arose, findings of the research and how the knowledge generated was translated into action. The results show that firstly relevance of science increases manifold when aligned to prominent policy decisions and real-world problems. Secondly, trans-disciplinary studies that synthesize social, economic and ecological aspects have a greater chance of influencing policy makers. Thirdly, mediation by science stewards holds lot of promise in connecting the worlds of academicians and policy makers. The study provides practical guidance on bridging the SPPI and contributes to the growing body of the literature on sustainability science.
KeywordsSustainability science Science stewards Co-production Synthesis Boundary work
We gratefully acknowledge the support received from Indian Institute of Forest Management, Wildlife Institute of India, Rural Management and Development Department, Government of Sikkim (RMDD), German Technical Cooperation (GIZ) and MGNREGA–National flagship programme of the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India. We gratefully acknowledge the role of RMDD support staff as well. The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments, which helped to strengthen the paper significantly.
- Aakella, K. V., & Kidambi, S. (2007). Challenging corruption with social audits. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(5), 345–347.Google Scholar
- Australian Public Service Commission. (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra: APSCGoogle Scholar
- Bhagwati, J. N., & Panagariya, A. (2012). India’s tryst with destiny: Debunking myths that undermine progress and addressing new challenges. Noida: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
- Boyd, J., & Kramer, J. (2017). Science and federal environmental decisions: A survey of interactions, successes, and difficulties (No. dp-17-02). Resources for the Future Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
- Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., Van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., et al. (2016). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4615–4622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Drèze, J. (2017). Economics among the road scholars, (vol. 113, p. 2). OPHI working paper.Google Scholar
- FSI [Forest Survey of India]. (2017). Forest survey of India. In: FSI. Indian State of Forest Report (ISFR) 2011 (pp. 278–283). Dehradun, India: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.Google Scholar
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). (2007). Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. Parry, et al. (Eds.), Contribution of Working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 470–506). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Kumar, V., & Sen, S. (2018). Analysis of spring discharge in the lesser Himalayas: A case study of Mathamali Spring, Aglar Watershed, Uttarakhand. In V. Singh, S. Yadav, R. Yadava (Eds.), Water resources Management. Water science and technology library (Vol. 78). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Lachungpa, U., Tambe, S., Arrawatia, M. L., & Poudyal, T. R. (2003). Biodiversity strategy and action plan: Sikkim State (p. 78). Gangtok: Department of Forest, Environment and Wildlife, Government of Sikkim, National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP).Google Scholar
- Lillesand, T. M., & Kiefer, R. W. (2000). Remote sensing and image interpretation (4th ed., p. 724). Singapore: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Maity, D., & Maiti, G. G. (2007). The Wild flowers of Kanchenjunga biosphere reserve (p. 174). Kolkata: Sikkim, Noya Udyog.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD), Government of India. (2016). Website of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005. http://nrega.nic.in/netnrega/home.aspx. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.
- Mittermeier, R. A., Gils, P. R., Hoffman, M., Pilgrim, J., Brooks, T., Mittermeier, C. G., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Hotspots Revisited. Earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial ecoregions. Mexico City, Washington, DC: CEMEX, Conservation International.Google Scholar
- Mittermeier, R. A., Turner, W. R., Larsen, F. W., Brooks, T. M., & Gascon, C. (2011). Global biodiversity conservation: the critical role of hotspots. In Biodiversity hotspots (pp. 3–22). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
- NASA Landsat Program. (1977). Landsat MSS scene p149r41_2m19770123, Orthorectified, GeoCover. USGS, Sioux Falls, SD, 01/23/1977.Google Scholar
- NASA Landsat Program. (2000). Landsat ETMþ scene p139r041_7t20001226, Orthorectified, GeoCover. USGS, Sioux Falls, SD, 12/26/2000.Google Scholar
- Negi, G. C. S., & Joshi, V. (1996). Geohydrology of springs in a mountain watershed: The need for problem solving research. Current Science, 71(10), 772–776.Google Scholar
- Negi, G. C. S., Kumar, K., Panda, Y. S., & Satyal, G. S. (2001). Water yield and water quality of some aquifers in the Himalaya. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 27, 55–59.Google Scholar
- NITI Aayog. (2018). Inventory and revival of springs in the Himalayas for water security. National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog, Government of India, August 2018.Google Scholar
- Rai, A. (2018). A ‘successful’ spring rejuvenation scheme lacks data to back the claim. Down To Earth, 23 June 2018.Google Scholar
- Rural Management and Development Department (RMDD), Government of Sikkim. (2016). Sikkim State Website of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act 2005. www.mgnregasikkim.org. Accessed 5 Nov 2017.
- SAARC. (2013). Success stories in mountain ecosystem management. Thimpu: SAARC Forestry Centre.Google Scholar
- Sathyakumar, S., Bashir, T., Bhattacharya, T., & Poudyal, K. (2011) Mammals of the Khangchendzonga Biosphere Reserve, Sikkim, India. In: M. L. Arrawatia & S. Tambe (Eds.), Biodiversity of Sikkim—Exploring and conserving a global hotspot (pp. 327–350). Information and Public Relations Department. http://sikkimforest.gov.in/Biodiversity-of-Sikkim.htm. Accessed 9 Aug 2019.
- Shah, M. (2009). Multiplier accelerator synergy in NREGA. The Hindu, April 30.Google Scholar
- Sikkim HDR. (2014). Sikkim Human Development Report, Sikkim Human Development Report Cell, Government of Sikkim, Gangtok, 2014.Google Scholar
- Singh, J. S. (2006). Sustainable development of the Indian Himalayan region: Linking ecological and economic concerns. Current Science, 90(6), 784–788.Google Scholar
- Strydom, W. F., Funke, N., Nienaber, S., Nortje, K., & Steyn, M. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: A review. South African Journal of Science, 106(5–6), 17–24.Google Scholar
- Tambe, S., Bhutia, N. T., & Arrawatia, M. L. (2005). People’s opinion on the Impacts of “Ban on Grazing” in Barsey Rhododendron Sanctuary, Sikkim, India. Sikkim 2005. The Mountain Institute, Forest Environment and Wildlife Management Department and WWF India. pp. 22. http://www.sikkimforest.gov.in/docs/Wildlife/wwfbarsey.pdf. Accessed 9 Aug 2019.
- Tambe, S., Kharel, G., Arrawatia, M. L., Kulkarni, H., Mahamuni, K., & Ganeriwala, A. (2012). Reviving dying springs: Climate change adaptation experiments from the Sikkim Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development, 32(1), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-11-00079.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tambe, S., Subba, A. B., Basi, J., Pradhan, S., & Rai, B. B. (2016). Decentralising accountability—Anti-corruption experiment from Sikkim. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(52), 95.Google Scholar
- TISS (Tata Institute of Social Sciences). (2017). A report on impact assessment on technical quality and economic assessment of the category B (individual assets for vulnerable sections) under MGNREGA and their impact on improving income status of the beneficiary household. New Delhi.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (2012). Greening rural development in India (Vol. I). Delhi: UNDP-India.Google Scholar
- UNDP. (2015). Social sector service delivery, good practices resource book. Delhi: UNDP-India.Google Scholar
- VDAP. (2011). Village development action plan (VDAP): Perspective plans at gram panchayat level. Gangtok, Sikkim: Rural Management and Development Department, Government of Sikkim.Google Scholar
- Verma, S., & Shah, T. (2018). Beyond digging and filling holes: Maximizing the net positive impact of MGNREGA. In M. Bhattarai, P. K. Viswanathan, R. N. Mishra, & C. Bantilan (Eds.), Employment guarantee programme and dynamics of rural transformation in India (pp. 103–130)., India studies in business and economics Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar