Advertisement

Detecting and understanding co-benefits generated in tackling climate change and environmental degradation in China

  • Shuo Gao
  • Ping JiangEmail author
Article

Abstract

China is facing the challenge of climate change and environmental protection in line with the promotion of sustainable development goals. Climate, environmental, and economic policy can each individually impact the effectiveness of other policies in the process of implementation. Understanding synergies among policy measures and identifying the co-benefits of environmental sustainable development generated by them is the focus of the paper. Because of existing restrictions in current research methods, the research community lacks the capacity to detect the interrelation among environmental, economic, and social development. Co-benefit research has gradually become an important area on sustainable development. Based on endogenous economic growth theory, we build a modified endogenous growth model to determine the optimal rates of economic growth, environmental pollution, energy input, and other factors in the context of co-benefits. Further empirical analysis is given which is missing in previous studies in this field. The empirical analysis reveals that China’s actual GDP, consumption, energy input, and physical capital growth rates are much higher than the optimal growth rate. However, the human capital and environmental pollution control growth rates are slower than the optimal values. Although China has a rapid growth in economy, the optimal level of comprehensive co-benefits has not been reached yet.

Keywords

Co-benefits Climate change Environmental protection Endogenous economic growth China 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71774033) and Fudan Tyndall Centre (No. JIH6286001).

References

  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, D., & Canestrelli, E. (2005). Dynamic portfolio optimization: Time decomposition using the Maximum Principle with a scenario approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 163(1), 217–229.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bils, M., & Klenow, P. J. (2000). Does schooling cause growth. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1160–1183.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, J., Guay, B., Jamet, S., & Corfee-Morlot, J. (2009a). Co-benefits of climate change mitigation policies: Literature review and new results. OECD Economics Department Working Papers.Google Scholar
  6. Bollen, J., van der Zwaan, B., Brink, C., & Eerens, H. (2009b). Local air pollution and global climate change: A combined cost-benefit analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 31(3), 161–181.Google Scholar
  7. Bovenberg, A. L., & Smulders, S. (1995). Environmental quality and pollution saving technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 369–391.Google Scholar
  8. BP. (2014). BP statistical review of world energy. http://www.bp.com/zh_cn/china/reports-and-publications/bp_2014. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
  9. Broome, J. (1992). Counting the cost of global warming. Cambridge: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
  10. Byrne, M. M. (1997). Is growth a dirty word? Pollution, abatement and endogenous growth’. Journal of Development Economics, 54(2), 261–284.Google Scholar
  11. Chow, G. C. (1993). Capital formation and economic growth in China. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 809–842.Google Scholar
  12. Cifuentes, L., Borja-Aburto, V. H., Gouveia, N., et al. (2001). Assessing the health benefits of urban air pollution reductions associated with climate change mitigation (2000–2020): Santiago, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, and New York City. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(suppl 3(2)), 419–425.Google Scholar
  13. Dasgupta, P., & Heal, G. (1974). The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 3–28.Google Scholar
  14. Dasgupta, P., & Heal, G. (1979). Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  15. David, F., & Hendry, S. (1995). Dynamic econometrics (p. 68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Den Butter, F. A. G., & Hofkes, M. W. (1995). Sustainable development with extractive and non-extractive use of the environment in production. Environmental & Resource Economics, 6(4), 341–358.Google Scholar
  17. Dong, K., & Sun, R. (2017). A review of China’s energy consumption structure and outlook based on a long-range energy alternatives modeling tool. Petroleum Science, 1(14), 214–227.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, D. J. (2006). Social discount rates for the European Union. Departmental Working Paper. 2006-20Google Scholar
  19. Gu, X. (2004). Two statistical methods for estimating the inter-temporal consumption elasticity of substitution of China. Tongji Yanjiu (Statistical Research), 9, 8–11.Google Scholar
  20. He, J. (1992). Estimation of assets in China. Shuliang Jingji Yu Jishu Jingji Yanjiu (Studies on Quantitative and Technological Economics), 8, 24–27.Google Scholar
  21. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 4, 682–690.Google Scholar
  22. Kula, E. (1985). An empirical investigation on the social time preference rate for the UK. Environment and Planning, 17, 199–217.Google Scholar
  23. López, R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. Journal of Environment Economics and Management, 27(2), 163–184.Google Scholar
  24. Mehra, R., & Prescott, E. C. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(2), 145–161.Google Scholar
  25. Michael, P., & Rotillon, G. (1996). Disutility of pollution and endogenous growth. University of Aix Marseille and Modem. Paris: University of Paris, Greoam, pp. 144–156.Google Scholar
  26. National Bureau of Statistics of China. (2014). China statistical yearbook 2013. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  27. Panayotou, T. (2000). Globalization and environment. CID Working Paper No. 53. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/content/download/69302/1250018/version/1/file/053.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019
  28. Pearce, D. W., & Ulph, D. (1999). A social discount rate for the United Kingdom. CSERGE Working Paper (Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 59–80).Google Scholar
  29. Pigou, A. C. (1932). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Price, C. (1989). The theory and applications of forest economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Rafaj, P., Schopp, W., Russ, P., et al. (2013). Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18(6), 801–824.Google Scholar
  32. Ramsey, F. P. (1928). A mathematical theory of saving. Economic Journal, 38, 543–559.Google Scholar
  33. Rive, N. (2010). Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control. Economic Modelling, 27(1), 103–115.Google Scholar
  34. Robson, A. J. (1980). Costly innovation and natural resources. International Economics Review, 21(1), 17–30.Google Scholar
  35. Romer, D. (2001). Advanced macroeconomics (pp. 1–5). Shanghai: Shanghai University of Finance & Economics Press.Google Scholar
  36. Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.Google Scholar
  37. Rypdal, K., Rive, N., Astrom, S., et al. (2007). Nordic air quality co-benefits from European post-2012 climate policies. Energy Policy, 35(12), 6309–6322.Google Scholar
  38. Scholz, C. M., & Ziemes, G. (1999). Exhaustible resources, monopolistic competition, and endogenous growth. Environmental & Resource Economics, 13(2), 169–185.Google Scholar
  39. Schou, P. A. (1996). Growth model with technological progress and non-renewable resources. Mimeo: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  40. Schultz, T. (1961). Investment in human capita. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  41. Scott, M. F. G. (1989). A new view of economic growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Shrestha, R. M., & Pradhan, S. (2010). Co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction in a developing country. Energy Policy, 38(5), 2586–2597.Google Scholar
  43. Smulders, S., & Gradus, R. (1996). Pollution abatement and long-term growth. European Journal of Political Economics, 12(3), 505–532.Google Scholar
  44. Solow, R. M. (2008). The economics of resources or the resources of economics. Journal of Natural Resources and Policy Research, 1, 69–82.Google Scholar
  45. Stiglitz, J. (1974). Growth with exhaustible natural resources: Efficient and optimal growth paths. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 123–137.Google Scholar
  46. Stokey, N. L. (1998). Are there limits to growth? International Economic Review, 39(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  47. Tang, X. J. (2006). Capital deepening, human capital accumulation, and sustainable economic growth of China. Shijie Jingji (The Journal of World Economy), 8, 57–64.Google Scholar
  48. Treasury, H. M. (2003). Appraisal and evaluation in central government (The Green Book). London: HMSO Press.Google Scholar
  49. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2015). Annual energy outlook 2015. https://www.eia.gov/pressroom/presentations/sieminski_05042015.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
  50. Uzawa, H. (1965). Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth. International Economics Review, 6(1), 18–31.Google Scholar
  51. Vuuren, D. P., Cofala, J., Eerens, H. E., et al. (2006). Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto Protocol for air pollution in Europe. Energy Policy, 34(4), 444–460.Google Scholar
  52. Wang, J. Y. (2001). Economic theory and empirical research of human capital (pp. 81–83). Beijing: Chinese Financial & Economic Publishing House.Google Scholar
  53. Wang, Y., & Yao, Y. (2003). Sources of China’s economic growth 1952–1999: Incorporating human capital accumulation. China Economic Review, 14(2), 32–52.Google Scholar
  54. Weitzman, M. (2007). Subjective expectations and asset-return puzzles. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1102–1130.Google Scholar
  55. Worrell, E., & Price, L. (2001). Policy scenarios for energy efficiency improvement in industry. Energy Policy, 29(14), 1223–1241.Google Scholar
  56. Zhang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Recalculating the capital of China and a review of Li and Tang’s article. Jingji Yanjiu (Journal of Economic Research), 7, 35–43.Google Scholar
  57. Zhang, L. (1991). Systemic analysis of economic efficiency during the 5th five year plan. Jingji Yanjiu (Journal of Economic Research), 4, 8–17.Google Scholar
  58. Zheng, S., Yi, H., & Li, H. (2015). The impacts of provincial energy and environmental policies on air pollution control in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 49, 386–394.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City University of New York Graduate CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and EngineeringFudan UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations