Mapping and monitoring of the land use/cover changes in the wider area of Itanos, Crete, using very high resolution EO imagery with specific interest in archaeological sites
- 49 Downloads
Archaeological site mapping is important for both understanding the history and protecting the sites from excavation during developmental activities. As archaeological sites are generally spread over a large area, use of high spatial resolution remote sensing imagery is becoming increasingly applicable in the world. The main objective of this study is to map the land cover of the Itanos area of Crete and of its changes, with specific focus on the detection of the landscape’s archaeological features. Six satellite images were acquired from the Pleiades and WorldView-2 satellites over a period of 3 years. In addition, digital imagery of two known archaeological sites was used for validation. An object-based image analysis classification was subsequently developed using the five acquired satellite images. Two rule sets were created, one using the standard four bands which both satellites have and another for the two WorldView-2 images with their four extra bands included. Validation of the thematic maps produced from the classification scenarios confirmed a difference in accuracy amongst the five images. Comparing the results of a 4-band rule set versus the 8-band rule set showed a slight increase in classification accuracy using extra bands. The resultant classifications showed a good level of accuracy exceeding 70%. Yet, separating the archaeological sites from the open spaces with little or no vegetation proved to be challenging. This was mainly due to the high spectral similarity between rocks and the archaeological ruins. The high resolution of the satellite data allowed for the accuracy in defining larger archaeological sites, but still there was difficulty in distinguishing smaller areas of interest. The digital image data provided a very good 3D representation for the archaeological sites, assisting as well as in validating the satellite-derived classification maps. To conclude, our study provides further evidence that use of high resolution imagery may allow for archaeological sites to be located, but only where the archaelogical features are of an adequate size.
Keywords3D modelling Archaeology Land cover mapping OBIA Remote sensing GIS
The authors would like to thank European Space Agency (ESA) and Digital Globe for their prompt provision of satellite imagery. GPP’s contribution to this work has been supported by the EU Marie Curie Project ENViSIon-EO (project contract ID 752094).
ARB conducted the research described in this study under the supervision and guidance of GPP and GPP together with LT and PKS prepared this manuscript for submission to the journal.
- Banerjee, R., & Srivastava, P. K. (2013). Reconstruction of contested landscape: Detecting land cover transformation hosting cultural heritage sites from Central India using remote sensing. Land Use Policy, 34(2013), 193–203.Google Scholar
- Banerjee, R., & Srivastava, P. K. (2014). Remote sensing based identification of painted rock shelter sites: Appraisal using advanced wide field sensor, neural network and field observations. In P. Srivastava, S. Mukherjee, M. Gupta, & T. Islam (Eds.), Remote sensing applications in environmental research. Springer, Cham: Society of Earth Scientists Series.Google Scholar
- Barker, P. (1986). Understanding archaeological excavation (p. 190). London: Batsford.Google Scholar
- Bassani, C., et al. (2009). Specific spectral bands for different land cover contexts to improve the efficiency of remote sensing archaeological prospection: The Arpi case study. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 10(1), 41–48.Google Scholar
- Bernard, M., Decluseau, D., Gabet, L., & Nonin, P. (2012). 3D capabilities of Pleiades satellite. In International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B3, 2012 XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August–01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
- Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
- Cetin, M. (2015). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 22(5), 420–424.Google Scholar
- Fowler, M. (2004). Archaeology through the keyhole: The serendipity effect of aerial reconnaissance revisited. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29, 118–134.Google Scholar
- Gordon, M., Loveland, E., & Cureton, E. (1952). An extended table of Chi square for two degrees of freedom, for use in combining probabilities from independent samples. Psychometrika, 17(3), 311–316.Google Scholar
- Grossiet, C., Brimblecombe, P., & Harris, L. (2007). Predicting long term freeze-thaw risks on Europe built heritage and archaeological sites in a changing climate. Science of the Total Environment, 377(2–3), 81–273.Google Scholar
- Hong, Y., et al. (2008). Discussion on UAV remote sensing image capture and disposal. Remote Sensing Technology and Application. Available at: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-YGJS200804020.htm [Accessed December 9th, 2018).
- Jacobsen, K., & Topan, H. (2015). DEM generation with short base length Pleiades triplet. In The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-3/W2, 2015 PIA15 + HRIGI15—Joint ISPRS Conference 2015, 25–27 March 2015, Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
- Karydas, C., Sekuloska, T., & Silleos, G. (2009). Quantification and site-specification of the support practice factor when mapping soil erosion risk associated with olive plantations in the Mediterranean island of Crete. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 149(1–4), 19–28.Google Scholar
- Kersten, T., & Lindstaedt, M. (2012). Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. In Euro-Mediterranean Conference. EuroMed 2012: Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation, pp. 1–10 Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_1 [Accessed December, 9th, 2018].
- Kim, M., Madden, M., & Warner, T. (2008). Estimation of optimal image object size for the segmentation of forest stands with multispectral IKONOS imagery. In T. Blaschke, S. Lang, & G. J. Hay (Eds.), Object-based image analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77058-9_16.Google Scholar
- Laben, C., & Brower, B. (2000). Process for enhancing the spatial resolution of multispectral imagery using pan-sharpening. US Patent 6,011,875. Available at: https://www.google.com/patents/US6011875 [Accessed September 24, 2018).
- Lafarge, F., Descombes, X., & Zerubia, J., (2006). Automatic 3D building reconstruction from DEMs: An application to PLEIADES simulations. In Proceedings of the ISPRS. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/download/30678958/T07-32.pdf [Accessed September 20, 2018].
- Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2006). Identification of archaeological buried remains based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from Quickbird satellite data. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 3(3), 325–328.Google Scholar
- Lasaponara, R., & Masini, N. (2012). Satellite remote sensing: A new tool for archaeology. Berlin: Springer. ISBN 978-90-481-8800-0.Google Scholar
- Lasaponara, R., et al. (2013). Remote sensing in archaeology: An overview. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 6(1), 7–17.Google Scholar
- Parcak, S. (2009). Satellite remote sensing for archaeology. Handbook, Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=bMQga28QMIUC&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=EO+technology+archaeology+application+review&ots=LWEmTFUjZe&sig=jFOMGbhmNFYgdUwTSGafTeSTATM [Accessed September 5, 2018].
- Pendlebury, J. (1969). The archaeology of Crete, Available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hi=en&lr=&id=Yv3MklpeJSQC&o=ifnd&pg=PR23&dq=crete+itanos+minoan&ots=ArFpUKaJ9u&sig=390LOg8HG05JVaZXVxdRQUuvTi4 [Accessed August 25, 2016].
- Rinaudo, F., Chiabrando, F., & Lingua, A. (2012). Archaeological site monitoring: UAV photogrammetry can be an answer. In ISPRS—International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XXXIX-B5, 2012, pp. 583–588.Google Scholar
- Schneider, E. (1982). Plunder or excavation? Observations and suggestions on the regulation of ownership and trade in the evidence of cultural patrimony. Syracuse Journal of International Law. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1938574 [Accessed September 19, 2018].
- Sturdy Colls C., & Colls, K. (2013). Reconstructing a painful past: A non-invasive approach to reconstructing lager norderney in alderney, the channel islands. In E. Ch’ng, V. Gaffney, & H. Chapman (Eds.), Visual heritage in the digital age. Springer, London: Springer Series on Cultural Computing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5535-5_7.Google Scholar
- Tite, M. (2002). Archaeological collections: invasive sampling versus object integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. Available at:http://www.piajournal.co.uk/articles/10.5334/pia.189/galley/246/download/ [Accessed September 20, 2018].