Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model

  • 467 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

The recent decades have witnessed an alarmingly phenomenal rise in population and economic growth, increasing the global resource demand and environmental degradation. The main objective of this study is to investigate the relationships between population, industrialization, affluence, technology, and sustainability. Approaching sustainability, a couple of viewpoints including weak and strong sustainability establish two different priorities, albeit with possibly the same factors as in the IPAT and STIRPAT models. This paper employs STIRPAT equation to estimate the relationships between population, industrialization, affluence, technology, and sustainability in MENA and OECD countries during 1975–2015. The results suggest that weak and strong sustainability, albeit slightly, is affected negatively by population and industrialization, and positively by technology and international agreements on environment, in MENA and OECD countries during 1975–2015. Therefore, the policy-makers in sustainability are advised to develop preventive and qualitative strategies for population and industrial activities, but inflationary ones for technology; besides the governments are suggested to confirm, join, and sign the international treaties on environmental conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

Source: Cato (2009) (The original design of this figure, Cato (2009), has three elements including economy, environment, and society, while we add other elements, technology, and industrialization, to show the sustainability in a quintuple-layer form.)

Fig. 2

Source: Cato (2009)

Fig. 3

Source: research findings

References

  1. Abdallh, A. A., & Abugamos, H. (2017). A semi-parametric panel data analysis on the urbanisation-carbon emissions nexus for the MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainability Energy Reviews,78(C), 1350–1356.

  2. Antoci, A., Galeotti, M., & Sordi, S. (2018). Environmental pollution as engine of industrialization. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,58, 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.06.016.

  3. Appiah, K., Du, J., Musah, A. I., & Afriyie, S. (2017). Investigation of the relationship between economic growth and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions as economic structure changes: Evidence from China. Resources and Environment,7(6), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.re.20170706.02.

  4. Ayres, R. U., Turton, H., & Casten, T. (2007). Energy efficiency, sustainability and economic growth. Energy,32, 634–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.06.005.

  5. Bonevac, D. (2010). Is sustainability sustainable? Academic Questions,23(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12129-009-9152-4.

  6. Cabeza-Gutes, M. (1996). The concept of weak sustainability. Ecological Economics,17, 147–156.

  7. Carvalho, N., Chaim, C., Cazarini, E., & Gerolamo, M. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in sustainable manufacturing. In Procedia manufacturing, 15th global conference on sustainable manufacturing (Vol. 21, pp. 671–678). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.02.170.

  8. Cato, M. S. (2009). Green economics: An introduction to theory, policy and practice (p. 37). London: Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-571-3.

  9. Costanza, R., & Daly, H. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology,6(1), 37–46.

  10. Dietz, S., & Neumayer, E. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics,61(4), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007.

  11. Dietz, T., & Rosa, E. A. (1994). Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review,1, 277–300.

  12. Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impacts of population growth. Science,171(3977), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212.

  13. Elgin, C., & Tumen, S. (2012). Can sustained economic growth and declining population coexist? Economic Modelling,29, 1899–1908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.004.

  14. Garmendia, E., Prellezo, R., Murillas, A., Escapa, M., & Gallastegui, M. (2010). Weak and strong sustainability assessment in fisheries. Ecological Economics,70, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.08.001.

  15. Georgiev, E., & Mihaylov, E. (2015). Economic growth and the environment: Reassessing the environmental Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions in OECD countries. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences,8(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-014-0114-2.

  16. Gowdy, J., & Ohara, S. (1997). Weak sustainability and viable technologies. Ecological Economics,22, 239–247.

  17. Greene, W. H. (2011). Chapter 11: Models for panels data. In R. Banister, P. J. Boardman & G. Soto (Eds.), Econometric analysis (pp 379–385, 7th ed.). New York: Pearson Education Limited.

  18. Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.

  19. Hamilton, K. (2000). Genuine saving as a sustainability indicator, Environment department papers; No. 77. Environmental Economics Series. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/908161468740713285/Genuine-saving-as-a-sustainability-indicator.

  20. Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6), 1251–1271. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.

  21. Li, L. B., Hu, J. L., & Xia, N. C. (2016). Industrial energy–pollution performance of regions in China based on a unified framework combining static and dynamic indexes. Journal of Cleaner Production,131, 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.025.

  22. Li, B., Liu, X., & Li, Z. (2015). Using the STIRPAT model to explore the factors driving regional CO2 emissions: A case of Tianjin, China. Natural Hazards,76, 1667–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1574-9.

  23. Liddle, B. (2015). What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates. Global Environmental Change,31, 62–73.

  24. Liddle, B., & Lung, S. (2010). Age structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: Revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts. Population and Environment,31(5), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-010-0101-5.

  25. Lin, S., Zhao, D., & Marinova, D. (2009). Analysis of the environmental impact of China based on STIRPAT model. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,29, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.009.

  26. Lindmark, M., Thu, H. N., & Stage, J. (2018). Weak support for weak sustainability: Genuine savings and long-term wellbeing in Sweden, 1850–2000. Ecological Economics,145, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.015.

  27. Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat International,68, 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.005.

  28. Malthus, T. T. (1798). An essay on the principle of population, J. Johonson. London: Library of Economics and Liberty. Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Malthus/malPop.html.

  29. Marsiglio, S. (2011). On the relationship between population change and sustainable development. Research in Economics,65, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2011.01.007.

  30. Martins, N. O. (2016). Ecosystems, strong sustainability and the classical circular economy. Ecological Economics,129, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.003.

  31. Moutinho, V., Varum, C., & Madaleno, M. (2017). How economic growth affects emission? An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in Portuguese and Spanish economic activity sectors. Energy Policy,106, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.069.

  32. OECD. (2016). OECD website. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/about/membersandpartners/.

  33. Saleh, I., Abedi, S., & Abedi, S. (2014). A panel data approach for investigation of gross domestic product (GDP) and CO2 causality relationship. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,16, 947–956.

  34. Salim, R. A., & Shafiei, S. (2014). Urbanization and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: An empirical analysis. Economic Modelling,38, 581–591.

  35. Schulze, P. (2002). I = PAT. Ecological Economics,40(2), 149–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00249-X.

  36. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1, 65–94.

  37. Solow, R. M. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. The Review of Economic Studies,41, 29–45.

  38. Taghvaee, V. M., Aloo, A. S., & Shirazi, J. K. (2016). Energy environment, and economy interaction in Iran with cointegrated and ECM simultaneous model. Procedia Economics and Finance,36, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30056-9.

  39. Taghvaee, V. M., & Hajiani, P. (2016). Environment, energy and environmental productivity of energy: a decomposition analysis in China and the US. International Review of Research in Emerging Markets and the Global Economy,1(1), 722–742.

  40. Taghvaee, V. M., Mavuka, M., & Shirazi, J. K. (2017). Economic growth and energy consumption in Iran: An ARDL approach including renewable and non-renewable energies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9862-z.

  41. Taghvaee, V. M., & Parsa, H. (2015). Economic growth and environmental pollution in Iran: Evidence from manufacturing and services sectors. Custos e Agronegocio,11(1), 115–127.

  42. Tehrani, S. M. J. H., Asghari, M. R., & Sarraf, F. (2016). The relationship between return on equity and return on assets with management remuneration for companies listed in the Tehran stock exchange (TSE). ICP Business, Economics and Finance,3(1), 29–35.

  43. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2016). Kyoto protocol. Available from: http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php.

  44. Wang, M., Liu, J., Wang, J., & Zhao, G. (2010). Ecological footprint and major driving forces in West Jilin province, Northeast China. Chinese Geographical Science,20(5), 434–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0417-1.

  45. Wei, T. (2011). What STIRPAT tells about effects of population and affluence on the environment? Ecological Economics,72, 70–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.015.

  46. World Bank Database. (2016). World Development Indicators. Available from: http://www.data.worldbank.org.

  47. World Health Organization. (2016). Ambient air pollution: A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease, Geneva. Available at: http://www.who.int/airpollution/NCD_AP_2_pager_draft_v1_4_March_2018.pdf?ua=1.

  48. York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2003). STIRPPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytic tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics,46, 351–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00188-5.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Mohadeseh-sadat Hashemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nasrollahi, Z., Hashemi, M., Bameri, S. et al. Environmental pollution, economic growth, population, industrialization, and technology in weak and strong sustainability: using STIRPAT model. Environ Dev Sustain 22, 1105–1122 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0237-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Weak sustainability
  • Strong sustainability
  • Environmental pollution
  • Economic growth
  • International agreements