Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 2793–2809 | Cite as

Effects of urban green spaces on residents’ well-being

  • Ben Ma
  • Tiantian Zhou
  • Shuo Lei
  • Yali WenEmail author
  • Theint Theint Htun
Article
First Online:
  • 467 Downloads

Abstract

Beijing is undergoing continuous urbanization, and considering the individual availability of urban green spaces is essential for alleviating the ecological problems created by this urbanization, especially in relation to improving residents’ well-being. To prove this effect, this article analyzed the social, mental, and physical well-being of current Beijing residents to determine their level of satisfaction, then applied the seemingly unrelated regression model to study how Beijing’s urban green spaces impact this well-being. The result showed that the higher the degree of resident participation with green spaces, the higher their well-being. Such participation includes actions like the frequency at which residents visit a park or green space. A significant inverted U-shaped effect was found between residents’ well-being and their distance from a park or public green space, indicating that residents with the highest well-being live between 1 and 5 km away, and residents with the lowest well-being live over 10 km away. Further, age, education, career status, marital status, years of residence in Beijing, residential area, and average income per month also have a significant impact on residents’ well-being. This study shows that green spaces can have a very positive effect on people’s welfare and provides support for their further promotion.

Keywords

Urban land use Utilization Well-being Urban planning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry entrusted project (20170619) and Natural Science Foundation of China (71373024) supported this research. We would also like to express our gratitude to the anonymous reviewers and editor. Any remaining errors are solely our own.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ambrey, C. (2012). Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia. Urban Studies,51(6), 1290–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrey, C. L., & Fleming, C. M. (2012). Public greenspace and life satisfaction in urban Australia (pp. 1290–1321). Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.Google Scholar
  3. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry. (2017). Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape an Forestry work points in 2017. http://www.bjyl.gov.cn/zwgk/fgwj/qtwj/201702/t20170206_188290.shtml. February 6, 2017. (Chinese version).
  4. Beijing Municipal Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Beijing Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  5. Beijing Municipal Environment Protection Bureau. (2017). The city’s PM2.5 annual average concentration decreased by 9.9% in 2016. Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau. http://www.bjepb.gov.cn/bjhrb/xxgk/jgzn/jgsz/jjgjgszjzz/xcjyc/xwfb/803842/index.html. Accessed on January 2017. (Chinese version).
  6. Bell, S., Hamilton, V., Montarzino, A., Rothnie, H., Travlou, P., & Alves, S. (2008). Greenspace and quality of life: A critical literature review. Stirling: Greenspace Scotland.Google Scholar
  7. Bertram, C., & Rehdanz, K. (2015). The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecological Economics,120, 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, F., Magnusson, J., Klemera, E., Chester, K., Spencer, N., & Smeeton, N. (2015). HBSC England National Report 2014. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire.Google Scholar
  9. Cao, C., & Han, L. Y. (2015). The assessment on the social health costs caused by fog and haze. Statistical Research J.,7, 19–23. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  10. Chen, Q. (2014). Advanced econometrics and stata application. Beijing: Higher Education Press. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  11. Dzhambov, A. M., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2014). Urban green spaces’ effectiveness as a psychological buffer for the negative health impact of noise pollution: A systematic review. Noise and Health,16(70), 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ekkel, E. D., & Vries, S. D. (2016). Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning,157, 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferreira, S., Akay, A., Brereton, F., et al. (2013). Life satisfaction and air quality in Europe. Ecological Economics,88(88), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferreira, S., & Moro, M. (2010). On the use of subjective well-being data for environmental valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics,46(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrer-i-carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ J.,114(497), 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleming, C. M., Manning, M., & Ambrey, C. L. (2016). Crime; Greenspace and life satisfaction: An evaluation of the New Zealand experience. Landscape and Urban Planning,149, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gidlöf, G. A., & Öhrström, E. (2007). Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning,83(2–3), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huynh, Q., Craig, W., Janssen, I., & Pickett, W. (2013). Exposure to public natural space as a protective factor for emotional well-being among young people in Canada. BMC Public Health,13(1), 407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kabisch, N., Qureshi, S., & Haase, D. (2015). Human–environment interactions in urban green spaces—A systematic review of contemporary issues and prospects for future research. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,50, 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. (2004). Toward national well-being accounts. American Economic Review,94(2), 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krekel, C., Kolbe, J., & Wüstemann, H. (2016). The greener, the happier? The effect of urban land use on residential well-being. Ecological Economics,121, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuo, F., Sullivan, W., Coley, R., & Brunson, L. (1998). Fertile ground for community: Inner-city neighborhood common spaces. American Journal of Community Psychology,26(6), 823–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Larson, L. R., Jennings, V., & Cloutier, S. A. (2016). Public parks and well-being in urban areas of the united states. PLoS ONE,11(4), e0153211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Owen, A. L., & Phillips, A. (2016). How does the life satisfaction of the poor; Least educated; and least satisfied change as average life satisfaction increases? Journal of Happiness Studies,17, 2389–2406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Puhakka, R., Pitkänen, K., & Siikamäki, P. (2016). The health and well-being impacts of protected areas in Finland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism,25(12), 1830–1847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Richardson, E., & Mitchell, R. (2010). Gender differences in relationships between urban green space and health in the United Kingdom. Social Science and Medicine,71, 568–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Russell, R., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Gould, R. K., Basurto, X., Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2013). Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annual Review of Environment and Resources,38, 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Song, B., Mu, Y. Y., & Hou, L. L. (2016). A study on the impact of farmers’ specialization on low carbonization in agriculture—Evidence from vegetable growers in Beijing. Journal of Natural Resources,31(03), 468–476. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  29. Tie, Z., & Lun, X. X. (2017). Six districts of Beijing Landscape Plants lag nearly ten thousand tons of dust. China Green Times. http://www.greentimes.com/green/news/yaowen/zhxw/content/2017-02/07/content_355546.htm. February 2, 2017. (Chinese version).
  30. Tsurumi, T., & Managi, S. (2015). Environmental value of green spaces in Japan: An application of the life satisfaction approach. Ecological Economics,120, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van den Berg, A. E., Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., et al. (2010). Green space as a buffer between stressful life events and health. Social Science and Medicine,70(8), 1203–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wagner, G., Frick, J., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel study (SOEP)—Evolution, scope and enhancements. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research,127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  33. Ward, J. S., Duncan, J. S., Jarden, A., & Stewart, T. (2016). The impact of children’s exposure to greenspace on physical activity, cognitive development, emotional wellbeing, and ability to appraise risk. Health & Place,40, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior,35(3), 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Using happiness data for environmental valuation: Issues and applications. Journal of Economic Surveys,23(2), 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. White, M. P., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science,24(6), 920–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu, D. C., Yu, S. H., & Qu, J. Y. (2014). Investigation on life satisfaction of new citizens community. Urban Problems,10, 96–100. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  38. Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology,42, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao Y.H., Strauss, J., & Yang G.H. (2015). China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2013 National Tracking). Peking University Open Research Data, V1. (Chinese version).Google Scholar
  40. Zhou, C. X., Zheng, F., Feng, D., et al. (2015). Research on promoting public health by forest therapy in Beijing. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science),14(02), 13–16. (Chinese version).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Ma
    • 1
  • Tiantian Zhou
    • 1
  • Shuo Lei
    • 1
  • Yali Wen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Theint Theint Htun
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementBeijing Forestry UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options