Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 2773–2792 | Cite as

Assessing the role of preparation for reuse in waste-prevention strategies by analytical hierarchical process: suggestions for an optimal implementation in waste management supply chain

  • Natalia M. Gusmerotti
  • Filippo CorsiniEmail author
  • Alessandra Borghini
  • Marco Frey
Article

Abstract

Reuse is one of the most important waste-prevention strategies. Although the importance of preparation for reuse is clear, preparation centres for reuse are not common in the traditional waste management supply chain. An analysis of their contribution in waste-prevention strategies is therefore needed. Our research evaluates three preparations for reuse scenarios in municipal solid waste management with an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). These alternatives were assessed with three criteria: economic, social and environmental. Sensitivity analyses were performed to study the impact on the final ranking of changes in various parameters. Results highlight that the best alternative is to include the preparation for reuse in the waste management supply chain, with a moderate recourse to it. The study sheds light on how managers can better plan preparation for reuse activities and provides new trajectories for future research.

Keywords

Reuse Circular economy Waste prevention Waste management Reverse supply chain 

References

  1. Antonopoulos, I. S., Perkoulidis, G., Logothetis, D., & Karkanias, C. (2014). Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,86, 149–159.Google Scholar
  2. Ardente, F., & Mathieux, F. (2014). Environmental assessment of the durability of energy-using products: method and application. Journal of Cleaner Production,74, 62–73.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, C., Wang, F., Huisman, J., & den Hollander, M. (2014). Products that go round: Exploring product life extension through design. Journal of Cleaner Production,69, 10–16.Google Scholar
  4. Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research,200, 198–215.Google Scholar
  5. Brent, A. C., Rogers, D. E., Ramabitsa-Siimane, T. S., & Rohwer, M. B. (2007). Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimise infection risks in developing countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 181(1), 403–424.Google Scholar
  6. Castellani, V., Sala, S., & Mirabella, N. (2015). Beyond the throwaway society: A life cycle-based assessment of the environmental benefit of reuse. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management,11, 373–382.Google Scholar
  7. Cole, C., Osmani, M., Quddus, M., Wheatley, A., & Kay, K. (2014). Towards a zero waste strategy for an English local authority. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,89, 64–75.Google Scholar
  8. Corsini, F., Gusmerotti, N. M., & Frey, M. (2018). Assessing WtE technologies by way of an analytic hierarchy process. In H. H. G. Post (Ed.), From waste to energy: Technology. The environment and the implications under EU law. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Cox, J., Giorgi, S., & Sharp, V. (2010). Household waste prevention—a review of evidence. Waste Management and Research,28, 193–219.Google Scholar
  10. Demesouka, O. E., Vavatsikos, A. P., & Anagnostopoulos, K. P. (2013). Suitability analysis for siting MSW landfills and its multicriteria spatial decision support system: method, implementation and case study. Waste management, 33(5), 1190–1206.Google Scholar
  11. Den Boer, E., den Boer, J., & Jager, J. (2005). Handbook for municipal waste prognosis and sustainability assessment of waste management systems. Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Den Boer, J., Den Boer, E., & Jager, J. (2007). LCA-IWM: a decision support tool for sustainability assessment of waste management systems. Waste management, 27(8), 1032–1045.Google Scholar
  13. Devoldere, T., Willems, B., Duflou, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2009). The eco-efficiency of reuse centres critically explored—the washing machine case. International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing,1(3), 265–285.Google Scholar
  14. EC (European Commission). (2008). Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives (Waste Framework Directive). Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  15. EC (European Commission). (2009). Waste prevention overview on indicators. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  16. EC (European Commission). (2012a). Guidance on the interpretation of key provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  17. EC (European Commission). (2012b). Preparing a waste prevention programme. Guidance document. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  18. EEA, European Environment Agency. (2013). Managing municipal solid waste—a review of achievements in 32 European countries report no. 2/2013.Google Scholar
  19. El Hanandeh, A., & El-Zein, A. (2007). A new stochastic multi-criteria decision analysis tool based on ELECTRE III method. In The ANZSEE conference: re-inventing sustainability: a climate for change; 3e6 July.Google Scholar
  20. El Hanandeh, A., & El-Zein, A. (2010). The development and application of multi-criteria decision-making tool with consideration of uncertainty: The selection of a management strategy for the bio-degradable fraction in the municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology,101, 555–561.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2011). COM(2011) 571 European Commission—communication: Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe doi:COM (2011) 571 final.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. (2015). COM(2015) 614 Final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Closing the Loop—an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission. (2017). COM(2017) 33 Final report from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Implementation of the Circular Economy Action Plan.Google Scholar
  24. EUROSTAT. (2015). Waste statistics. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Waste_statistics.
  25. Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy—a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production,143, 757–768.Google Scholar
  26. Gelbmann, U., & Hammerl, B. (2015). Integrative re-use systems as innovative business models for devising sustainable product–service-systems. Journal of Cleaner Production,97, 50–60.Google Scholar
  27. Gharfalkar, M., Court, R., Campbell, C., Ali, Z., & Hillier, G. (2015). Analysis of waste hierarchy in the European waste directive 2008/98/EC. Waste Management,39, 305–313.Google Scholar
  28. González, X. M., Rodríguez, M., & Pena-Boquete, Y. (2017). The social benefits of WEEE re-use schemes. A cost benefit analysis for PCs in Spain. Waste Management,64, 202–213.Google Scholar
  29. Gorsevski, P. V., Donevska, K. R., Mitrovski, C. D., & Frizado, J. P. (2012). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: a case study using ordered weighted average. Waste management, 32(2), 287–296.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, B. (2012). SPMT12_002: The market potential and demand for product re-use introduction. Collaborative waste, resources and sustainable consumption evidence programme, Defra. United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  31. Hofmann, P. (2013). Wasted waste—Disappearing reuse at the peri-urban interface. Environmental Science & Policy,31, 13–22.Google Scholar
  32. ISPRA. (2015). Rapporto Rifiuti Urbani—Edizione 2015.Google Scholar
  33. ISTAT. (2015). Indicatori demografici—Anno 2014.Google Scholar
  34. Kahhat, R., & Williams, E. (2009). Product or waste? Importation and end-of-life processing of computers in Peru. Environmental Science and Technology,43(15), 6010–6016.Google Scholar
  35. Kissling, R., Coughlan, D., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., et al. (2013). Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,80, 21–31.Google Scholar
  36. Kissling, R., Fitzpatrick, C., Boeni, H., Luepschen, C., Andrew, S., & Dickenson, J. (2012). Definition of generic re-use operating models for electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,65, 85–99.Google Scholar
  37. Kondili, L., Bartzis, I., Kapsali, M., & Kaldellis, J. K. (2012). Multicriteria analysis of municipal solid waste energy recovery technologies in Greece. Global NEST Journal,14(2), 225–234.Google Scholar
  38. Luger, T., & Herrmann, P. D. I. C. (2010). Referenzprozessbasierte Gestaltung und Bewertung von Reverse Supply Chains. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum,18(2), 91–99.Google Scholar
  39. Mahjouri, M., Ishak, M. B., Torabian, A., Manaf, L. A., & Halimoon, N. (2017). The application of a hybrid model for identifying and ranking indicators for assessing the sustainability of wastewater treatment systems. Sustainable Production and Consumption,10, 21–37.Google Scholar
  40. McCollough, J. (2009). Factors impacting the demand for repair services of household products: The disappearing repair trades and the throwaway society. International Journal of Consumer Studies,33, 619–626.Google Scholar
  41. Michelini, G., Moraes, R. N., Cunha, R. N., Costa, J. M. H., & Ometto, A. R. (2017). From linear to circular economy: PSS conducting the transition. Procedia CIRP,64, 2–6.Google Scholar
  42. Milovantseva, N., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2015). Barriers to electronics reuse of transboundary e-waste shipment regulations: An evaluation based on industry experiences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,102, 170–177.Google Scholar
  43. Milutinović, B., Stefanović, G., Dassisti, M., Marković, D., & Vučković, G. (2014). Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model. Energy,74, 190–201.Google Scholar
  44. Nixon, D. J., Dey, P. K., Gosh, S. K., & Davies, P. A. (2013). Evaluation of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India using the hierarchical analytical network process. Energy,59, 215–223.Google Scholar
  45. O’Connell, M., Fitzpatrick, C., & Hickey, S. (2010). Investigating reuse of B2C WEEE in Ireland. In Sustainable systems and technology (ISSST), 2010 IEEE international symposium on (pp. 1–6). IEEE.Google Scholar
  46. O’Connell, M., Hickey, S., Besiou, M., Fitzpatrick, C., & Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Feasibility of using radio frequency identification to facilitate individual producer responsibility for waste electrical and electronic equipment. Journal of industrial ecology, 17(2), 213–223.Google Scholar
  47. OECD. (2000). Working Party on Pollution Prevention and Control; STRATEGIC WASTE PREVENTION; OECD Reference Manual. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=env/epoc/ppc(2000)5/final.
  48. OECD. (2016). Municipal waste. OECD Environment Statistics (database).  https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00601-en. (Accessed on 01 February 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Östlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2009). Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production,17(11), 999–1009.Google Scholar
  50. Ouyang, X., & Guo, F. (2016). Paradigms of mangroves in treatment of anthropogenic wastewater pollution. Science of the Total Environment,544, 971–979.Google Scholar
  51. Ouyang, X., Guo, F., Shan, D., Yu, H., & Wang, J. (2015). Development of the integrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process with multidimensional scaling in selection of natural wastewater treatment alternatives. Ecological Engineering,74, 438–447.Google Scholar
  52. Pabule, J., Blumberga, A., Romagnoli, F., & Blumberga, D. (2015). Finding an optimal solution for biowaste management in the Baltic States. Journal of Cleaner Production,88, 214–223.Google Scholar
  53. Parajuly, K., & Wenzel, H. (2017). Potential for circular economy in household WEEE management. Journal of Cleaner Production,151, 272–285.Google Scholar
  54. Pires, A., Chang, N. B., & Martinho, G. (2011). An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,56(1), 7–21.Google Scholar
  55. Pochampally, K. K., & Gupta, S. M. (2003). A multi-phase mathematical programming approach to strategic planning of an efficient reverse supply chain network. In Electronics and the environment, 2003. IEEE international symposium on (pp. 72–78). IEEE.Google Scholar
  56. Polanec, B., Aberšek, B., & Glodež, S. (2013). Informal education and awareness of the public in the field of waste management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,83, 107–111.Google Scholar
  57. Prisca. (2015). FINAL report. Available at http://www.progettoprisca.eu/it/doc/viewcategory/8-deliverables. Accessed on 10/1/16.
  58. Ramanathan, R. (2001). A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management,63(1), 27–35.Google Scholar
  59. Read, M., Gregory, M. K., & Phillips, P. S. (2009). An evaluation of four key methods for monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,54(1), 9–20.Google Scholar
  60. Roussat, N., Dujet, C., & Mehu, J. (2009). Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis. Waste Management,29, 12–20.Google Scholar
  61. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York, NY: McGraw.Google Scholar
  62. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9–26Google Scholar
  63. Saaty, T. L. (2000). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process, Analytic Hierarchy Process Series (vol. 6). Pittsburg: Auflage.Google Scholar
  64. San Martin, D., Orive, M., Martínez, E., Iñarra, B., Ramos, S., González, N., et al. (2017). Decision making supporting tool combining AHP method with GIS for implementing food waste valorisation strategies. Waste and Biomass Valorization,8(5), 1555–1567.Google Scholar
  65. Sauve, S., Bernard, S., & Sloan, P. (2016). Environmental sciences, sustainable development and circular economy: alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environment, Development,17, 48–56.Google Scholar
  66. Sharp, V., Giorgi, S., & Wilson, D. C. (2010). Methods to monitor and evaluate household waste prevention. Waste Management and Research,28(3), 269–280.Google Scholar
  67. Singh, J., & Ordoñez, I. (2016). Resource recovery from post-consumer waste: Important lessons for the upcoming circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134 (Part A), 342–353.Google Scholar
  68. Soltani, A., Hewage, K., Reza, B., & Sadiq, R. (2015). Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of Municipal Solid Waste Management: A review. Waste Management,35, 318–328.Google Scholar
  69. Stahel, W. R. (2013). Policy for material efficiency—sustainable taxation as a departure from the throwaway society. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20110567.Google Scholar
  70. Streicher-Porte, M., Marthaler, C., Böni, H., Schluep, M., Camacho, A., & Hilty, L. M. (2009). One laptop per child, local refurbishment or overseas donations? Sustainability assessment of computer supply scenarios for schools in Colombia. Journal of Environmental Management,90, 3498–3511.Google Scholar
  71. Tavares, G., Zsigraiova, Z., Semiao, V., & da Graça Carvalho, M. (2008). A case study of fuel savings through optimisation of MSW transportation routes. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 19(4), 444–454.Google Scholar
  72. Tecchio, P., McAlister, C., Mathieux, F., & Ardente, F. (2017). In search of standards to support circularity in product policies: A systematic approach. Journal of Cleaner Production,168, 1533–1546.Google Scholar
  73. Truttmann, N., & Rechberger, H. (2006). Contribution to resource conservation by reuse of electrical and electronic household appliances. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,48(3), 249–262.Google Scholar
  74. Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research,48(1), 2–8.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, E., Kahhat, R., Allenby, B., Kavazanjian, E., Kim, J., & Xu, M. (2008). Environmental, social, and economic implications of global reuse and recycling of personal computers. Environmental Science and Technology,42(17), 6446–6454.Google Scholar
  76. Yap, H. Y., & Nixon, J. D. (2015). A multi-criteria analysis of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India and the UK. Waste Management,46, 265–277.Google Scholar
  77. Zeng, Y., & Trauth, K. M. (2005). Internet-based fuzzy multicriteria decision support system for planning integrated solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Informatics,6(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  78. Zorpas, A. A., & Lasaridi, K. (2013). Measuring waste prevention. Waste Management,33(5), 1047–1056.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia M. Gusmerotti
    • 1
  • Filippo Corsini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandra Borghini
    • 1
  • Marco Frey
    • 1
  1. 1.Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna – Istituto di ManagementPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations