Measuring and comparing the sustainability of coastal tourism destinations in Germany, Lithuania, and Indonesia

  • Johanna SchumacherEmail author
  • Gerald Schernewski
  • Donalda Karnauskaitė
  • Marija Kataržytė
  • Stefanie Pakleppa
  • Kathrin Pape
  • Silke Schönwald
  • Matthias Völzke


An important aim of the European Sustainable Development Strategy is to measure the state of sustainability in coastal communities. While numerous indicators have been developed to estimate a regions sustainability, they go largely unused, due to the difficulty in applying them over a broad region. In an effort to improve upon this situation, we have improved the indicator set developed within the SUSTAIN project and merged these indicators with the QualityCoast label for sustainable tourism destinations, creating a joint methodology and developing an applicable self-assessment spreadsheet tool. The tool includes six categories, subdivided into 117 single indicators. We then tested the tool by applying it to ten contrasting tourism destinations in Germany, Lithuania, and Indonesia. In total, 17 unique applications were run, with the objective being to test the tools applicability, reproducibility, and utility for coastal communities. The applications showed that results can be biased, stemming from an evaluators’ perception of a given site or ecosystem. Thus, results are not easily reproducible, which negatively affects comparability with other destinations. However, results indicate that the tool can be used to categorize the sustainability of a region, helping to raise community awareness and guide future planning. Furthermore, communities benefit from the fact that a positive assessment will easily enable them to apply for the QualityCoast label. With clear guidelines and reference values, repeated applications can help communities evaluate whether their efforts are contributing to a sustainable coastal development.


Indicators ICM QualityCoast Sustainable development Self-assessment tool Coastal destinations 



The work was partly funded by the BONUS BALTCOAST project. BONUS BALTCOAST has received funding from BONUS (Art 185) funded jointly from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration and from Baltic Sea national funding institutions (BMBF 03F0717A). We would also like to express special thanks to Albert Salman (QualityCoast Programme) as well as Xenia Loizidou and Michalis Loizides (ISOTECH Ltd, Cyprus) for providing their knowledge and expertise. Furthermore, we would also like to thank all anonymous reviewers for their critical input to the manuscript and Râna Campbell and Mark Nepf for their English revisions. Finally, we extend our thanks to the students of the universities of Klaipeda and Rostock, who supported the indicator applications and to the experts that supported the data collections for the in-depth applications.

Supplementary material

10668_2018_301_MOESM1_ESM.docx (16.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 17085 kb)


  1. Agostini, V. N., Grantham, H. S., Wilson, J., et al. (2012). Achieving fisheries and conservation objectives within marine protected areas: Zoning the Raja Ampat network. Report no. 2/12 (The Nature Conservancy, Indo-Pacific Division, Denpasar).Google Scholar
  2. Agyeiwaah, E., McKercher, B., & Suntikul, W. (2017). Identifying core indicators of sustainable tourism: A path forward? Tourism Management Perspectives, 24, 26–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardiwidjaja, R. (2008). Strategi pengembangan Raja Ampat warisan di ujung timur Indonesia. Journal of Kepariwisataan Indonesia, 3(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  4. Blancas, F. J., Lozano-Oyola, M., & González, M. (2015). A European sustainable tourism labels proposal using a composite indicator. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 54, 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blue Flag Programme. (2017). Blue Flag Beach Criteria and explanatory notes 2017. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  6. Buckley, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), 528–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burbridge, P. R. (1997). A generic framework for measuring success in integrated coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 37(2), 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coastal and Marine Union (EUCC). (2015). QualityCoast programme manual 2015, version 2015/2.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities (CEC). (2005). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament. Draft declaration on guiding principles for sustainable development, COM (2005) 218 final. Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, A. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehler, C. N. (2003). Indicators to measure governance performance in integrated coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46(3–4), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Council. (2006). Current sustainable development strategy. DOC 10917/06.Google Scholar
  13. European Union (EU). (2016). The European tourism indicator system (ETIS) toolkit 2016, Luxemburg.
  14. Fontalvo-Herazo, M. L., Glaser, M., & Lobato-Ribeiro, A. (2007). A method for the participatory design of an indicator system as a tool for local coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50(10), 779–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graymore, M. L., Sipe, N. G., & Rickson, R. E. (2008). Regional sustainability: how useful are current tools of sustainability assessment at the regional scale? Ecological Economics, 67(3), 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansestadt Rostock. (2014). Statistisches Jahrbuch der Hansestadt Rostock 2014.Google Scholar
  18. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henocque, Y. (2003). Development of process indicators for coastal zone management assessment in France. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46(3–4), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffmann, J. (2009). Indicators for an ICZM. Experience with a problem-oriented approach. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 13(2), 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holden, E., Linnerud, K., & Banister, D. (2014). Sustainable development: our common future revisited. Global Environmental Change, 26, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Karnauskaite, D., Schernewski, G., Schumacher, J., Grunert, R., & Povilanskas, R. (2018). Assessing coastal management case studies around Europe using an indicator based tool. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 22(3), 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klaipeda City Municipality. (2018). Accessed November 18, 2018.
  25. Klaipeda Tourism and Culture Information Center. (2018). Accessed November 20, 2018.
  26. Landeshauptstadt Kiel. (2014). Kieler Zahlen 2013. Statistischer Bericht Nr. 232. Landesamt Kiel, Amt für Wirtschaft, Abteilung Statistik.Google Scholar
  27. Loizidou, X. I., & Loizides, M. I. (2012). DeCyDe: A participatory method for “measuring” sustainability through a friendly, flexible and adjustable self-assessment tool. In K. Belpaeme et al. (Eds.), Book of abstracts. International conference littoral 2012: Coasts of tomorrow. Kursaal, Oostende, 27–29 November 2012 (Vol. 61, pp. 41–44). VLIZ Special Publication.Google Scholar
  28. Lozano-Oyola, M., Blancas, F. J., González, M., & Caballero, R. (2012). Sustainable tourism indicators as planning tools in cultural destinations. Ecological Indicators, 18, 659–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mariani, M. M., Buhalis, D., Longhi, C., & Vitouladiti, O. (2014). Managing change in tourism destinations: Key issues and current trends. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 2(4), 269–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mascarenhas, A., Coelho, P., Subtil, E., & Ramos, T. B. (2010). The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment. Ecological Indicators, 10(3), 646–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mascarenhas, A., Nunes, L. M., & Ramos, T. B. (2014). Exploring the self-assessment of sustainability indicators by different stakeholders. Ecological Indicators, 39, 75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLaughlin, S., McKenna, J., & Cooper, J. A. G. (2002). Socio-economic data in coastal vulnerability indices: Constraints and opportunities. Journal of Coastal Research, 36(sp1), 487–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Möllers, D. S. (2013). The benefits of QualityCoast to European tourism destinations. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  34. Official Statistics Portal. (2018). Accessed November 20, 2018.
  35. Olsen, S. B. (2003). Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean and Coastal Management, 46(3–4), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Mahony, C., Ferreira, M., Fernandez-Palacios, Y., Cummins, V., & Haroun, R. (2009). Data availability and accessibility for sustainable tourism: An assessment involving different European coastal tourism destinations. Journal of Coastal Research, 56, 1135–1139.Google Scholar
  37. Ostseebad Kühlungsborn. (2014). Kühlungsborn – Fakten und Zahlen. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  38. Palangos Turizmo Informacijos Centras. (2018). Accessed November 18, 2018.
  39. Pan, S. Y., Gao, M., Kim, H., Shah, K. J., Pei, S. L., & Chiang, P. C. (2018). Advances and challenges in sustainable tourism toward a green economy. Science of the Total Environment, 635, 452–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pemerintah Kabupaten Bantul. (2014a). Accessed November 19, 2018.
  41. Pemerintah Kabupaten Bantul. (2014b). Accessed November 19, 2018.
  42. Pemerintah Kabupaten Bantul. (2012). Accessed November 19, 2018.
  43. Pemerintah Kabupaten Raja Ampat. (2014). Accessed November 19, 2018.
  44. Pickaver, A. H. (2009). Further testing of the approved EU indicator to measure the progress in the implementation of integrated coastal zone management in Europe. In E. Dahl, E. Moksness, & J. Støttrup (Eds.), Integrated coastal zone management. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Pickaver, A. H., Gilbert, C., & Breton, F. (2004). An indicator set to measure the progress in the implementation of integrated coastal zone management in Europe. Ocean and Coastal Management, 47(9–10), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pires, S. M., Fidélis, T., & Ramos, T. B. (2014). Measuring and comparing local sustainable development through common indicators: Constraints and achievements in practice. Cities, 39, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Port of Kiel. (2018). Accessed November 20, 2018.
  48. Portrait of the Regions of Lithuania. (2018). Accessed November 20, 2018.
  49. Pupphachai, U., & Zuidema, C. (2017). Sustainability indicators: A tool to generate learning and adaptation in sustainable urban development. Ecological Indicators, 72, 784–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. QualityCoast. (2015). Accessed November 19, 2015.
  51. Reed, M. S., Fraser, E. D., & Dougill, A. J. (2006). An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics, 59(4), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reed, M., Fraser, E. D., Morse, S., & Dougill, A. J. (2005). Integrating methods for developing sustainability indicators to facilitate learning and action. Ecology and society, 10(1), r3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sarda, R., Avila, C., & Mora, J. (2005). A methodological approach to be used in integrated coastal zone management processes: the case of the Catalan Coast (Catalonia, Spain). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 62(3), 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schernewski, G., Schönwald, S., & Kataržytė, M. (2014). Application and evaluation of an indicator set to measure and promote sustainable development in coastal areas. Ocean and Coastal Management, 101, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schumacher, J., Schernewski, G., Bielecka, M., Loizides, M. I., & Loizidou, X. I. (2018). Methodologies to support coastal management: A stakeholder preference and planning tool and its application. Marine Policy, 94, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shields, D. J., Šolar, S. V., & Martin, W. E. (2002). The role of values and objectives in communicating indicators of sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 2(1–2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2012). An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators, 15(1), 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. SIS-Online. (2015). Daten in Tourismus. Statistisches Informationssystem. Accessed February 14, 2015.
  59. Song, H., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Evaluation of sustainable tourism development of the hotel industry in Hainan, China by earth check. Open Access Library Journal, 1(09), 1.Google Scholar
  60. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2015). Städte (Alle Gemeinden mit Stadtrecht) nach Fläche, Bevölkerung und Bevölkerungsdichte am 31.12.2015. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  61. SUSTAIN Partnership. (2012a). The SUSTAIN indicator set. A set of easily measurable sustainability indicators. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  62. SUSTAIN Partnership. (2012b). Measuring coastal sustainability. A guide for the self-assessment of sustainability using indicators and a means of scoring them. Accessed November 20, 2018.
  63. Tepelus, C. M., & Cordoba, R. C. (2005). Recognition schemes in tourism: From ‘eco’ to ‘sustainability’? Journal of Cleaner Production, 13(2), 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Torres-Delgado, A., & Palomeque, F. L. (2014). Measuring sustainable tourism at the municipal level. Annals of Tourism Research, 49, 122–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vikipedija. (2018). Šventoji (gyvenvietė). Accessed November 18, 2018.
  66. Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., & Verbruggen, A. (2014). Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development. Sustainability, 6(9), 5512–5534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Weisner, E., & Schernewski, G. (2013). Adaptation to climate change: A combined coastal protection and re-alignment scheme in a Baltic tourism region. Journal of Coastal Research, 65(sp2), 1963–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Coastal and Marine Management GroupLeibniz-Institute for Baltic Sea Research WarnemündeRostockGermany
  2. 2.Marine Research InstituteKlaipeda UniversityKlaipedaLithuania
  3. 3.University of Rostock, Wissenschaftliche WeiterbildungRostockGermany
  4. 4.Hochschule Konstanz University of Applied Sciences (HTWG) HTWG KonstanzConstanceGermany

Personalised recommendations