Advertisement

Environment, Development and Sustainability

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 303–329 | Cite as

Design principles for protected area certificates: a case study on strategic investor groups

  • Nathalie MeißnerEmail author
  • Etti Winter
Article
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Biological capacity of earth is limited. While it is obvious at first glance, it has been ignored for decades. Policy makers attempt to overcome the persistent depletion of the human livelihood base through the establishment of protected areas. However, the financial means to sustainably manage a representative network of protected areas on a global scale do not yet exist, and particularly, private sector investment is extremely modest. One option for increasing private investment flows is the development of a market place for protected area certificates (PACs) issued for geographical areas managed according to social and environmental best practices. This paper utilizes semi-structured expert interviews with 39 German companies to analyze major product and market requirements for the sound implementation of an international certification scheme for PACs. Based on a triangulation approach that combines quantitative and qualitative evaluations with the two-step clustering procedure for strategic investor groups, seven design principles are determined that might encourage voluntary investment funds from the private sector, and thus support the sustainable management of protected areas. Having a look at existing markets for protected areas, one scheme provides a good foundation for the defined design principles: the LifeWeb initiative—an online clearing house for protected area developers and potential investors.

Keywords

Biodiversity Certification Cluster analysis Ecosystem services LifeWeb Private sector investment Protected area Sustainable finance 

References

  1. Adams, W. M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., et al. (2004). Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science, 306, 1146–1149.Google Scholar
  2. Albers, H., Maloney, M., & Robinson, E. (2017). Economics in systematic conservation planning for lower-income countries: A literature review and assessment. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 10(2), 145–182.Google Scholar
  3. Altieri, M., & Toledo, V. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty, and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38, 587–612.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarado-Quesada, I., Hein, L., & Weikard, H. P. (2014). Market-based mechanisms for biodiversity conservation: A review of existing schemes and an outline for a global mechanism. Biodiversity Conservation, 23, 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s10531-013-0598-x.Google Scholar
  5. Anders, S., Souza-Monteiro, D., & Rouviere, E. (2010). Competition and credibility of private third-party certification in international food supply. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 22, 328–341. doi: 10.1080/08974431003641554.Google Scholar
  6. Angelsen, A. (2017). REDD+ as result-based aid: General lessons and bilateral agreements of Norway. Review of Development Economics, 21(2), 237–264. doi: 10.1111/rode.12271.Google Scholar
  7. Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A., Larson, A., Martius, C., Sunderlin, W., et al. (2017). Learning from REDD+: A response to Fletcher et al. Conservation Biology, 31(3), 718–720. doi: 10.1111/cobi.1293.Google Scholar
  8. Atmosfair. (2012). Holiday with atmosfair. Atmosfair gGmbH. https://www.atmosfair.de/en/travel-climate-friendly/holiday-with-atmosfair/. Accessed July 2012.
  9. Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2003). Multivariate Analysemethoden. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Barrett, C. B. (2008). Poverty traps and resource dynamics in smallholder agrarian systems. In R. B. Dellink & A. Ruijs (Eds.), Economics of poverty, environment and natural-resource use (pp. 17–40). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith, C., Fisher, R., & Bray, D. (2015). Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 35, 226–238. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011.Google Scholar
  12. Bayon, R. (2004). Making environmental markets work: Lessons from early experience with sulfur, carbon, wetlands, and other related markets. Forest Trends. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_629.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  13. BBOP. (2012). Standard & guidelines. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP), Forest Trends. http://bbop.foresttrends.org/pages/guidelines. Accessed July 2015.
  14. BBOP. (2016). Biodiversity offsets. Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP), Forest Trends. http://bbop.forest-trends.org/pages/biodiversity_offsets. Accessed February 2016.
  15. Bellyer-Domingo, A., Hernandez-Sancho, F., & Molinos-Senante, M. (2016). A review of Payment for Ecosystem Services for the economic internalization of environmental externalities: A water perspective. Geoforum, 70, 115–118. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.02.018.Google Scholar
  16. Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001.Google Scholar
  17. Bernard, F., McFatridge, S., & Minang, P. A. (2012). The private sector in the REDD+ supply chain: Trends, challenges and opportunities. The International Institute for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2012/redd_private_sector_report.pdf. Accessed July 2015.
  18. Bertzky, B., Corrigan, C., Kemsey, J., Kenney, S., Ravilious, C., Besançon, C., & Burgess, N. (2012). Protected planet report 2012: Tracking progress towards global targets for protected areas. IUCN and UNEP-WCMC. https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/protected_planet_report.pdf. Accessed October 2013.
  19. Bishop, J., Kapila, S., Hicks, F., Mitchell, P., & Vorhies, F. (2008). Building biodiversity business. Shell International Limited and IUCN. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2008-002.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
  20. Blom, M., Bergsma, G., & Korteland, M. (2008). Economic instruments for biodiversity. Setting up a biodiversity trading system in Europe. CE Delft. http://www.ce.nl/art/uploads/file/7638_finalreportMB.pdf. Accessed February 2016.
  21. Bratrich, C., Truffer, B., Jorde, K., Markard, J., Meier, W., Peter, A., et al. (2004). Green hydropower: A new assessment procedure for river management. River Research and Applications, 20(7), 865–882. doi: 10.1002/rra.788.Google Scholar
  22. Bräuer, I., Müssner, R., Marsden, K., Oosterhuis, F., Rayment, M., Miller, C., & Dodoková, A. (2006). The use of market incentives to preserve biodiversity. Final report. A project under the framework contract for economic analysis. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/biodiversity/pdf/mbi.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  23. Carius, F. (Ed.) (2012). Payments for ecosystem services: Towards an implementation strategy. Federal Agency for Nature Conservation. http://www.bfn.de/fileadmin/MDB/documents/service/Skript_326.pdf. Accessed August 2013.
  24. Castka, P., Leaman, D., Shand, D., Cellarius, D., Healy, T., Mead, A., De Franco, M., & Timoshyna, A. (2016). Certification and biodiversity: How voluntary certification standards impact biodiversity and human livelihoods. Policy Matters, Issue 21. Gland: CEESP and IUCN.Google Scholar
  25. CBD. (1992). Convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  26. CBD. (2012). The LifeWeb initiative: A review of progress and options for the future. In Conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity, 11th meeting, Hyderabad, India. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-11/information/cop-11-inf-48-en.pdf. Accessed September 2013.
  27. CBD. (2014a). Private sector funding. https://www.cbd.int/financial/privatefunding/. Accessed May 2014.
  28. CBD. (2014b). LifeWeb—Partnerships for financing biodiversity. http://lifeweb.cbd.int/. Accessed March 2014.
  29. CCBA. (2012). Study on the demand for smallholder- and community-led land-based carbon projects. The Climate, Community and Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA) and Conservation International. https://s3.amazonaws.com/CCBA/Upload/Revision+and+small/CCB+Standards+for+Smallholders+Demand+Side+Interviews+September+2012.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  30. CCBA. (2017). New sustainable landscapes rating tool. http://www.climate-standards.org/2017/06/01/new-sustainable-landscapes-rating-tool/ Accessed September 2017.
  31. Clenaghan, S., Morenos, J. L., & Thomas, A. (2009). Stimulating private capital investment to achieve REDD+. In Forest investment review (pp. 73–94). London: Forum for the Future. https://www.forumforthefuture.org/sites/default/files/images/Forum/Projects/Forest-Investment-Review/Chapter3_FIR.pdf. Accessed July 2015.
  32. Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N. (2007). The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Development and Change, 38(4), 587–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x.Google Scholar
  33. Corbera, E., & Pascual, U. (2012). Ecosystem services: Heed social goals. Science, 335, 655–656. doi: 10.1126/science.335.6069.655-c.Google Scholar
  34. Cormack, R. M. (1971). A review of classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 134(3), 321–367.Google Scholar
  35. Corsin, F., Funge-Smith, S., & Clausen, J. (2007). A qualitative assessment of standards and certification schemes applicable to aquaculture in the Asia–Pacific region. FAO regional office for Asia and the Pacific. ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/010/ai388e/ai388e00.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  36. Cortex Consultants. (2009). Voluntary biodiversity offsets: Improving the environmental management toolbox. Cortex Consultants Inc. http://www.cortex.ca/BiodiversityOffsets-12Sep09.pdf. Accessed March 2013.
  37. Credit Suisse, WWF, & Mc Kinsey & Company. (2014). Conservation finance—Moving beyond donor funding toward an investor-driven approach. https://www.credit-suisse.com/responsibility/doc/conservation_finance_en.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  38. Crona, B., Gelcich, S., & Bodin, Ö. (2017). The importance of interplay between leadership and social capital in shaping outcomes of rights-based fisheries governance. World Development, 91, 70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.10.006.Google Scholar
  39. Deal, R. L., Cochran, B., & LaRocco, G. (2012). Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 17, 69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.12.007.Google Scholar
  40. Denier, L., Scherr, S., Shames, S., Chatterton, P., Hovani, L., Stam, N., et al. (2015). The little sustainable landscapes book. Oxford: Global Canopy Programme.Google Scholar
  41. Dudley, N. (Ed.) (2008). Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/guidelines_for_applying_protected_area_management_categories.pdf. Accessed September 2013.
  42. DuPont, C., Levitt, J., & Bilmes, L. (2015). Green bonds and land conservation: The evolution of a new financing tool. Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper Series, RWP15-072.Google Scholar
  43. Duraiappah, A. K., & Naeem, S. (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, World Resources Institute. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/guidelines_for_applying_protected_area_management_categories.pdf. Accessed September 2013.
  44. Ecosystem Marketplace. (2013). Innovative markets and market-like instruments for ecosystem services. The matrix 2013. Forest Trends. www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/. Accessed February 2016.
  45. Eden, S. (2009). The work of environmental governance networks: Traceability, credibility and certification by the Forest Stewardship Council. Geoforum, 40(3), 383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.01.001.Google Scholar
  46. Emerton, L., Bishop, J., & Thomas, L. (2006). Sustainable financing of protected areas: A global Review of challenges and options. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series No. 13. IUCN. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/emerton_et_al_2006.pdf. Accessed June 2013.
  47. Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011.Google Scholar
  48. European Commission. (2010). EU best practice guidelines for voluntary certification schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs. Communication (2010/C 341/04), Official Journal of the European Union 53. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:341:0005:0011:en:PDF. Accessed October 2013.
  49. Ewing, B., Moore, D., Goldfinger, S., Oursler, A., Reed, A., & Wackernagel, M. (2010). The ecological footprint Atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/images/uploads/Ecological_Footprint_Atlas_2010.pdf. Accessed April 2012.
  50. Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Wunder, S., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Moreno-Sanchez, R. (2016). Global patterns in the implementation of payments for environmental services. PLoS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149847.Google Scholar
  51. Farley, J., & Costanza, R. (2010). Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics, 69, 2060–2068.Google Scholar
  52. Fletcher, R., & Büscher, B. (2017). The PES conceit: Revisiting the relationship between payments for environmental services and neoliberal conservation. Ecological Economics, 132, 224–231.Google Scholar
  53. Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Anderson, Z., et al. (2017). Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al. Conservation Biology, 31(3), 721–723. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12934.Google Scholar
  54. Foli, S., Ros-Tonen, M., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2017). Natural resource management schemes as entry points for integrated landscape approaches: Evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso. Environmental Management. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0866-8.Google Scholar
  55. Formann, A. K. (1984). Die latent-class-analyse: Einführung in die Theorie und Anwendung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  56. Fry, B. P. (2011). Community forest monitoring in REDD+: The ‘M’ in MRV? Environmental Science & Policy, 14(2), 181–187. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.004.Google Scholar
  57. Garson, G. D. (2012). Cluster analysis—Blue book series. Asheboro: Statistical Associates Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Gebra, M., & Agrawal, A. (2017). Beyond rewards and punishments in the Brazilian Amazon: Practical implications of the REDD+ discourse. Forests. doi: 10.3390/f8030066.Google Scholar
  59. Ghazoul, J., Garcia, C., & Kushalappa, C. (2011). Landscape labelling approaches to PES: Bundling services, products and stewards. In D. Ottaviani & N. Scialabba (Eds.), Payment for ecosystem services and food security (pp. 171–189). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  60. Giovannucci, D., & Ponte, S. (2005). Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry. Food Policy, 30(3), 284–301. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2005.05.007.Google Scholar
  61. Githiru, M., King, M. W., Bauche, P., Simon, C., Boles, J., Rindt, C., et al. (2015). Should biodiversity offsets help finance underfunded protected areas? Biological Conservation, 191, 819–826. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.07.033.Google Scholar
  62. GNF, DUH. (2014). Markets for natural capital. Status quo and prospects. http://www.globalnature.org/bausteine.net/f/8088/MarketsforNaturalCapital-StatusQuoandProspects.pdf?fd=2. Accessed July 2015.
  63. Gray, C. L. (2011). Soil quality and human migration in Kenya and Uganda. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 421–430. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.02.004.Google Scholar
  64. Gronau, S., Winter, E., & Grote, U. (2017). Modelling nature-based tourism impacts on rural development and conservation in Sikunga Conservancy, Namibia. Development Southern Africa, 34(3), 276–294. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2016.1269638.Google Scholar
  65. Hamrick, K. (2014). Verified conservation areas: A real-estate market for biodiversity? http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=10492&section=news_articles&eod=1. Accessed July 2015.
  66. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.Google Scholar
  67. Huwleyer, F., Käppeli, J., & Tobin, J. (2016). Conservation finance. From Niche to Mainstream: The building of an institutional asset class. Credite Suisse & Mc Kinsey. https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20160121144045/conservation-finance-en.pdf. Accessed April 2017.
  68. IIED. (2007). Guatemala—Sierra de las Minas. http://www.watershedmarkets.org/casestudies/Guatemala_Sierra_Minas.html. Accessed May 2014.
  69. ISEAL. (2013). Principles for credible and effective sustainability standards systems. ISEAL credibility principles. ISEAL alliance. http://www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/ISEAL%20Credibility%20Principles%20v0.3%20-%20Final%20for%20Consultation%20%28March%202013%29.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  70. Ishihara, H., & Pascual, U. (2012). Social capital, and collective action in environmental governance. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, P. Jouvet, & M. Willinger (Eds.), Global environmental commons, analytical and political challenges in building governance mechanisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Jahn, G., Schramm, M., & Spiller, A. (2005). The reliability of certification: Quality labels as a consumer policy tool. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(1), 53–73. doi: 10.1007/s10603-004-7298-6.Google Scholar
  72. Jax, K. (2010). Ecosystem functioning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Kaimowitz, D., & Sheil, D. (2007). Conserving what and for whom? Why conservation should help meet basic human needs in the tropics. Biotropica, 39(5), 567–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00332.x.Google Scholar
  74. Karousakis, K., & Brooke, Q. (Eds.). (2010). Paying for biodiversity—Enhancing the cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  75. Karpowicz, Z., Foxall, J., & Day, M. (2009). Handbook for developing and implementing pro-biodiversity business projects. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). https://www.cbd.int/doc/case-studies/inc/cs-inc-eur-pbbhandbook-workshop2009-en.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  76. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  77. KfW. (2015). Green bonds made by KfW. KfW Entwicklungsbank. https://www.kfw.de/KfW-Group/Investor-Relations/KfW-Green-Bonds. Accessed December 2015.
  78. Klewes, J., & Wreschniok, R. (Eds.). (2010). Reputation capital: Building and maintaining trust in the 21st century. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Kusters, K. (2015). Climate-smart landscapes and the landscape approach: An exploration of the concepts and their practical implications. Wageningen: Tropenbos International.Google Scholar
  80. Laing, T., Taschini, T., & Palmer, C. (2016). Understanding the demand for REDD+ credits. Environmental Conservation, 43(4), 389–396. doi: 10.1017/S0376892916000187.Google Scholar
  81. Lambooy, T., & Levashova, Y. (2011). Opportunities and challenges for private sector entrepreneurship and investment in biodiversity, ecosystem services and nature conservation. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 7(4), 301–318. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2011.629632.Google Scholar
  82. Landell-Mills, N., & Porras, I. T. (2002). Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor. IIED. http://www.cbd.int/doc/external/iied/iied-silver-report-2002-en.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  83. LZ. (2012). Top 100 Lieferanten Deutschland 2012. LZnet. http://www.lebensmittelzeitung.net/business/daten-fakten/rankings/Top-100-Lieferanten-Deutschland-2012_338.html. Accessed November 2012.
  84. Madsen, B., Carroll, N., Kandy, D., & Bennett, G. (2011). Update: state of biodiversity markets. Forest Trends. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/reports/2011_update_sbdm. Accessed February 2016.
  85. Mallet, P., Maireles, E., Kennedy, E., & Devisscher, M (2016). ISEAL Report: How sustainability standards can contribute to landscape approaches and zero deforestation. https://www.isealalliance.org/sites/default/files/ISEAL_Standards%20_Contributions_to_Landscape_Approaches_April16_Final.pdf. Accessed April 2017.
  86. Mandel, J. T., Donlan, C. J., & Armstrong, J. (2010). A derivative approach to endangered species conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(1), 44–49. doi: 10.1890/070170.Google Scholar
  87. McMillan, J. (2002). Reinventing the bazaar: A natural history of markets. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
  88. Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Guariguata, M. R., Nasi, R., Sunderland, T., & Putzel, L. (2011). Ecosystem services certification: Opportunities and constraints. Occasional Paper 66, CIFOR. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-66.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  89. Meißner, N., & Grote, U. (2017). Motives, opportunities, and risks for private sector investment in protected areas with international importance: Evidence from German companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 19(1), 199–219. doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9722-2.Google Scholar
  90. Milder, J. C., Scherr, S. J., & Bracer, C. (2010). Trends and future potential of payment for ecosystem services to alleviate rural poverty in developing countries. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 4 [online]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art4/.
  91. Mwangi, S. (2008). Payments for ecosystem services (PES) in East and Southern Africa: Assessing prospects & pathways forward. Nairobi: Katoomba Group.Google Scholar
  92. Namirembe, S., Leimona, B., van Noordwijk, M., Bernard, F., & Bacwayo, K. (2014). Co-investment paradigms as alternatives to payments for tree-based ecosystem services in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.016.Google Scholar
  93. NatureVest, & EKO Asset Management Partners. (2014). Investing in Conservation. A landscape assessment of an emerging market. http://www.naturevesttnc.org/Reports/info.html. Accessed May 2015.
  94. Pagiola, S., Arcenas, A., & Platais, G. (2005). Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development, 33(2), 237–253. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.011.Google Scholar
  95. Parker, C., Cranford, M., Oakes, N., & Leggett, M. (2012). The little biodiversity finance book. Global Canopy Programme. http://www.globalcanopy.org/sites/default/files/LittleBiodiversityFinanceBook_3rd%20edition.pdf. Accessed July 2015.
  96. Parker, C., Mitchell, A., Trivedi, M., & Mardas, N. (2009). The little REDD+ book. Global Canopy Programme. http://www.globalcanopy.org/sites/default/files/lrb_en_0.pdf. Accessed April 2012.
  97. Perrot-Maître, D. (2006). The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: A ‘‘perfect’’ PES case?. London: IIED, DFID.Google Scholar
  98. Peters-Stanley, M., Gonzalez, G., & Yin, D. (2013). Covering new ground state of the forest carbon markets 2013. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/SOFCMfull-report.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  99. Pilgrim, J. D., & Bennun, L. (2014). Will biodiversity offsets save or sink protected areas? Conservation Letters, 7(5), 423–424. doi: 10.1111/conl.12145.Google Scholar
  100. Reed, J., Van Vianen, J., Deakin, E., Barlow, J., & Sunderland, T. (2016). Integrated landscape approaches to managing social and environmental issues in the tropics: Learning from the past to guide the future. Global Change Biology, 22, 2540–2554.Google Scholar
  101. Robertson, N., & Wunder, S. (2005). Fresh tracks in the forest: Assessing incipient payments for environmental services initiatives in Bolivia. CIFOR. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BRobertson0501.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  102. Roe, D., & Elliott, J. (2006). Pro-poor conservation: The elusive win-win for conservation and poverty reduction? Policy Matters, 14, 53–63.Google Scholar
  103. Roe, D., Nelson, F., & Sandbrook, C. (2009). Community management of natural resources in Africa: Impacts, experience and future directions. Natural Resources Institute Issue No. 18, International Institute for Environment and Development. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17503IIED.pdf. Accessed February 2015.
  104. Sachs, J. D., & Reid, W. V. (2006). Investments toward sustainable development. Science, 312, 1002. doi: 10.1126/science.1124822.Google Scholar
  105. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.Google Scholar
  106. Smit, H., Mcnally, R., & Gijsenbergh, A. (2015). Implementing Deforestation-free supply chains—Certification and beyond. http://www.snv.org/public/cms/sites/default/files/explore/download/implementing_deforestation-free_supply_chains.pdf. Accessed April 2017.
  107. Sperling, F., & de Kock, M. (2010). Protecting forests for the benefit of climate, nature and people: Integrating lessons from Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) into Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+). WWF Norway. http://awsassets.wwf.no/downloads/wwf_norway_report_protecting_forests_for_the_benefit_of_climate_nature_and_people_fns_md.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  108. Stanton, T., Echavarria, M., Hamilton, K., & Ott, C. (2010). State of watershed payments: An emerging marketplace. http://www.forest-trends.org/documents/files/doc_2438.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  109. Supply Change. (2016). Supply Change—Commitments that count. http://supply-change.org/. Accessed February 2016.
  110. SZ. (2011). Top 100 in Deutschland. Süddeutsche Zeitung (186), 13./14./15. August 2011. München: Süddeutscher.Google Scholar
  111. Tayleur, C., Balmford, A., Buchanan, G., Butchard, S., Ducharme, H., Green, R., et al. (2016). Global coverage of agricultural sustainability standards, and their role in conserving biodiversity. Conservation Letters, 00, 1–8.Google Scholar
  112. ten Kate, K., Bishop, J., & Bayon, R. (2004). Biodiversity offsets: Views, experience, and the business case. IUCN and Insight Investment. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/bdoffsets.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  113. The REDD Desk. (2017). Additionality. http://theredddesk.org/markets-standards/design-features/additionality. Accessed August 2017.
  114. TourCert. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in tourism—Certified companies at a glance. TourCert. http://www.tourcert.org/index.php?id= zertifizierte-unternehmen1. Accessed July 2012.
  115. Travers, H., Clements, T., & Milner-Gulland, E. (2016). Predicting responses to conservation interventions through scenarios: A Cambodian case study. Biological Conservation, 204, 403–410.Google Scholar
  116. Turpie, J. K., Marais, C., & Blignaut, J. N. (2008). The working for water programme: Evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 788–798. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.024.Google Scholar
  117. Tweddle, D., Cowx, I., Peel, R., & Weyl, O. (2015). Challenges in fisheries management in the Zambezi, one of the great rivers of Africa. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 22, 99–111. doi: 10.1111/fme.12107.Google Scholar
  118. Ugarte, S., van Dam, J., & Spijkers, S. (2013). Recognition of private certification schemes for public regulation: Lessons learned from the renewable energy directive. GIZ. http://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/Publikationen-PDF/BiofuelsWorkshop_GIZ_RecognitionOf_PrivateCertificationSchemes.pdf. Accessed October 2013.
  119. Umwelt Partnerschaft. (2012). Liste der Umweltpartner, Stand 26.03.2012. Hamburg: Geschäftsstelle UmweltPartnerschaft, Behörde für Stadtentwicklung und Umwelt.Google Scholar
  120. UN PRI, & UNEP FI. (2011). Universal ownership: Why environmental externalities matter to institutional investors. http://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/documents/universal_ownership_full.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  121. UNDP. (2016). The 2016 BioFin workbook: Mobilizing resources for biodiversity and sustainable development. The Biodiversity Finance Initiative, UNDP. http://www.biodiversityfinance.net/sites/default/files/content/publications/undp-biofin-web_0.pdf. Accessed April 2017.
  122. Valbuena, D. F., Groot, J. C. J., Mukalama, J., Gerard, B., & Tittonell, P. A. (2014). Improving rural livelihoods as a ‘moving target’: Trajectories of change in smallholder farming systems of Western Kenya. Regional Environmental Change, 15(7), 1395–1407. doi: 10.1007/s10113-014-0702-0.Google Scholar
  123. Valtin, G. (2011). Forests and carbon: A review of additionality, Forestry Commission Research Report. https://www.forestry.gov.uk/pdf/fcrp013.pdf/$file/fcrp013.pdf. Accessed August 2017.
  124. Vatn, A., Barton, D. N., Lindhjem, H., Movik, S., Ring, I., & Santos, R. (2011). Can markets protect biodiversity? An evaluation of different financial mechanisms. Noragric Report No. 60, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, UMB. http://www.umb.no/statisk/noragric/publications/reports/2011_nor_rep_60.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  125. VCA. (2015). VCA registry. http://v-c-a.org/registry/. Accessed July 2015.
  126. WBCSD. (2010). Effective biodiversity and ecosystem policy and regulation. Business input to the COP 10 of the Convention on Biological Diversity, World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). http://www.cbd.int/business/doc/WBCSD_Biodiversity_Ecosystem_Policy_Paper_COP%2010%20.pdf. Accessed April 2012.
  127. WEF. (2013). From the margins to the mainstream. Assessment of the impact investment sector and opportunities to engage mainstream investors. A report by the World Economic Forum Investors Industries. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_II_FromMarginsMainstream_Report_2013.pdf. Accessed May 2014.
  128. Wegner, G. (2016). Payments for ecosystem services (PES): A flexible, participatory, and integrated approach for improved conservation and equity outcomes. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2016(18), 617–644. doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9673-7.Google Scholar
  129. Wendland, K. J., Honzák, M., Portela, R., Vitale, B., Rubinoff, S., & Randrianarisoa, J. (2010). Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar. Ecological Economics, 69(11), 2093–2107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.01.002.Google Scholar
  130. Whelpton, L., & Ferri, A. (2017). Private capital for working lands conservation—A market development framework. The conservation finance network. http://www.conservationfinancenetwork.org/sites/default/files/Private_Capital_for_Working_Lands_Conservation.pdf. Accessed April 2017.
  131. World Bank. (2015). What are green bonds? http://treasury.worldbank.org/cmd/htm/WorldBankGreenBonds.html. Accessed December 2015.
  132. Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. Occasional Paper No. 42. CIFOR, Bogor. http://theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/resources/pdf/2012/payment-ecosystem-services-02.pdf. Accessed August 2013.
  133. Wunder, S. (2007). The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00559.x.Google Scholar
  134. Wunder, S. (2008). Payments for environmental services and the poor: Concepts and preliminary evidence. Environment and Development Economics, 13(3), 279–297. doi: 10.1017/S1355770X08004282.Google Scholar
  135. Wunder, S., & Börner, J. (2013). Payments for environmental services: Conservation with pro-poor benefits. In D. Roe, J. Elliott, C. Sandbrook, & M. Walpole (Eds.), Biodiversity conservation and poverty alleviation: Exploring the evidence for a link (pp. 225–238). Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar
  136. WWF. (2006). Forest certification assessment guide. WWF International and World Bank Global Forest Alliance. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTFORESTS/Resources/FCAG_WB_English.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  137. Zadek, S., Polacow, F., & Forstater, M. (2012). Win-win-win? Testing an approach to catalysing climate, community and economic sustainability at the core of the Amazon. Amazonas Sustainable Foundation. http://fas-amazonas.org/versao/2012/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/winwinwin_case_study.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Environmental Economics and World TradeLeibniz University HannoverHannoverGermany

Personalised recommendations