Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing use-values and relative importance of trees for livelihood values and their potentials for environmental protection in Southern Burkina Faso

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical ethnobotanical studies in Burkina Faso and the Sahel apply unmodified use-value methods, which often fail to capture uses of plants within and across categories. These methods mask both the relative uses and local people’s ‘true’ knowledge of plant species. This study addresses these methodological weaknesses by assessing plant use-values within and across eight use categories for livelihood values and their potentials for environmental protection among 48 informants, selected through a stratified random technique. The research is twofold: (1) to document and identify the conservation status of plant species and (2) to assess local knowledge and perceived importance of the most easily found plant species in relation to informant’s age, gender, ethnicity, and location. Seventy-three plant species belonging to 24 families were recorded on fields, fallows, and forests. The most easily found 30 species belonged to 14 families of which Combretaceae, Mimosodeae, Caesalpinioideae, and Anacardiaceae dominated. Results show that Adansonia digitata, Parkia biglobosa, Vitellaria paradoxa, and Balanites aegyptiaca were more valued for livelihood benefits, while A. digitata, Tamarindus indica, and Ficus thonningii received more value for their potentials in environmental protection. Local knowledge was unevenly distributed and showed significant differences at the 0.01 % level among gender, age, ethnicity, and study village. The relative importance of plant uses goes beyond nutrition and potentials in environmental protection and can provide valuable information for creating local markets for such goods. Three species belonging to different families were identified as vulnerable and considered priority for conservation. The design of conservation and development projects should consider creating opportunities for knowledge sharing that will not only improve knowledge but provide better understanding of local priorities based on sociocultural and economic factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiott, J. (2003). Investigating the convention on biological diversity’s protections for traditional knowledge. Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review, 11(3), 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayantunde, A. A., Briejer, M., Hiernaux, H., Henk, M., Udo, J., & Tabo, R. (2008). Botanical knowledge and its differentiation by age, gender and ethnicity in southwestern Niger. Human Ecology, 36, 881–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayantunde, A. A., Hiernaux, H., Briejer, M., Henk, U., & Tabo, R. (2009). Uses of local plant species by agropastoralists in South-western Niger. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 7, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belem, B., Nacoulma, B. M., Gbangou, R., Kambou, S., Hansen, H. H., & Gausset, Q. (2007). Use of non wood forest products by local people bordering the ‘Parc National Kaboré Tambi’, Burkina Faso. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 6, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10, 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2002). Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. Pages 121–146 in Gunderson. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington DC, USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byg, A., & Balslev, H. (2001). Diversity and use of palms in Zahamena, eastern Madagascar. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10, 951–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). (1992). Text of the convention on biological diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/text/default.shtml. Accessed December 27, 2014.

  • Charnley, S., Fischer, A. P., & Jones, E. T. (2007). Integrating traditional and local ecological knowledge into forest biodiversity conservation in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management, 246, 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2001). Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resource management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications, 11, 584–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lucena, R. F. P., de Medeiros, P. M., de Lima Araújo, E., Alves, A. G. C., & de Albuquerque, U. P. (2012). The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: An assessment based on use value. Journal of Environmental Management, 96, 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dovie, D. B. K., Witkowski, E. T. F., & Shackleton, C. M. (2008). Knowledge of plant resource use based on location, gender and generation. Applied Geography, 28, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, P., Deckers, J., & Spaargaren, O. (2001). Lectures notes on the Major Soils of the World.

  • FAO. World soil resources, report-94. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Faso (West Africa): A national-scale analysis with focus on traditional medicine. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, 9. http://www.ethnobiomed.com/content/11/1/9.

  • Faye, M. D., Weber, J. C., Mounkoro, B., & Dakouo, J. M. (2010). Contribution of parkland trees to village livelihoods—A case study from Mali. Development in Practice, 20, 428–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Biodiversity: Ecology Economics, Policy, 22, 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi, A., & Turner, N. (2004). Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1.

  • Ghimire, S. K., McKey, D., & Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y. (2004). Heterogeneity in ethnoecological knowledge and management of medicinal plants in the Himalayas of Nepal: Implications for conservation. Ecology and Society, 9(3), 6. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art6/.

  • Gouwakinnou, G. N., Lykke, A. M., Assogbadjo, A. E., & Sinsin, B. (2011). Local knowledge, pattern and diversity of use of Sclerocarya birrea. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 7, 8. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-7-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn-Hadjali, K., & Thiombiano, A. (2000). Perception des espèces en voie de disparition en milieu gourmantché: Causes et solutions. Berichte des Sonderforschungsbereichs 268, Bd. 14 (pp. 285–297). Frankfurt, Germany.

  • Hamilton, A. C., Shengji, P., Kessy, J., Khan, A. A., Lagos-Witte, S., & Shinwari, Z. K. (2003). The purposes and teaching of applied ethnobotany. People and plants working paper no. 11. WWF-US, Surrey.

  • Hanazaki, N., Tamashiro, J. Y., Leitão-Filho, H. F., & Begossi, A. (2000). Diversity of plant uses in two Caiçara communities from the Atlantic forest coast, Brazil. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 597–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B., & Gallaher, T. (2007). Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, F. L. (2005). The Catch-22 of conservation: Indigenous peoples, biologists, and cultural change. Human Ecology, 33, 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, H. P. (2000). Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: Methods and applications. Ecological Applications, 10, 1270–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INSD. (2007). Résultats préliminaires du recensement général de la population et de l’habitat de 2006. Institut National des Statistiques et de la Demographie (INSD), Direction de la Demographie: Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

  • Jama, B. A., Mohamed, A. M., Mulatya, J., & Njui, A. N. (2008). Comparing the ‘Big Five’: A framework for the sustainable management of indigenous fruit trees in the drylands of East and Central Africa. Ecological Indicators, 8, 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. P., Andriamarovololona, M. M., & Hockley, N. (2008). The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 22(4), 976–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepe, T. (2008). Beyond the numbers: Understanding the value of vegetation to rural livelihoods in Africa. Geoforum, 39, 958–968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, M., & Balslev, H. (2003). Perceptions, use and availability of woody plants among the Gourounsi in Burkina Faso. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1715–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, M., & Lykke, A. M. (2003). Informant-based valuation of use and conservation preferences of savanna trees in Burkina Faso. Economic Botany, 57(2), 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucena, R. F., Araùjo, P. E. L., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2007). Does the local availability of woody Caatinga plants (Northeastern Brazil) explain their use value? Economic Botany, 61, 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoga, E. J., Witkowski, E. T. F., & Balkwill, K. (2000). Differential utilization and ethnobotany of trees in Kitulanghalo forest reserve and surrounding communal lands, eastern Tanzania. Economic Botany, 54, 328–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, A. M. (2000a). Local perceptions of vegetation change and priorities for conservation of woody savanna vegetation in Senegal. Journal of Environmental Management, 59, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, A. M. (2000b). Refining the ecological aspects of disequilibrium theories for Africa’s pastoral drylands. Desertification Control Bulletin, 36, 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lykke, A. M., Kristensen, M. K., & Ganaba, S. (2004). Valuation of local use and dynamics of 56 woody species in the Sahel. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13, 1961–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadembega, P., Boussim, J. I., Nikiema, J. B., Poli, F., & Antognoni, F. (2011). Medicinal plants in Baskoure, Kourittenga Province, Burkina Faso: An ethnobotanical study. Journal Ethnopharmacol, 133, 378–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikiema, A. (2005). Agroforestry parkland species diversity: Uses and management in Semi-Arid West Africa (Burkina Faso). Ph.D. thesis. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

  • Nyong, A., Adesina, F., & Elasha, B. O. (2007). The value of indigenous knowledge in climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies in the African Sahel. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 12, 787–797. doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9099-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, P., & Folke, C. (2001). Local ecological knowledge and institutional dynamics for ecosystem management: A case study of Lake Racken watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems, 4, 85–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouedraogo, I., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M., Cole, R., Odén, P. C., & Ouadba, J. M. (2009). Is rural migration a threat to environmental sustainability in Southern Burkina Faso? Land Degradation and Development, 20(2), 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, S., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M., Ouadba, J. M., & Odén, P. C. (2010). Consumptive values and local perception of dry forest decline in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 12, 277–295. doi:10.1007/s10668-009-9194-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paré, S., Söderberg, U., Sandewall, M., & Ouadba, J. M. (2008). Land use analysis from spatial and field data capture in Southern Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127(3–4), 277–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., & Gentry, A. H. (1993). The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: 2. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany, 47, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ræbild, A., Hansen, H. H., Dartell, J., Kiléa Ky, J.-M., & Sanou, L. (2007). Ethnicity, land use and woody vegetation: A case study from south-western Burkina Faso. Agroforestry Systems, 70, 157–167. doi:10.1007/s10457-007-9043-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricker, I. (2002). Legume diversity and ethnobotanical surveys in the northern Guinea savannah of Nigeria. M.Sc. Thesis. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Hohenheim.

  • Rim-Rukeh, A., Irerhievwie, G., & Agbozu, E. (2013). Traditional beliefs and conservation of natural resources: Evidences from selected communities in Delta State, Nigeria. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 5(7), 426–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossato, S. C., Leitão-Filho, H. F., & Begossi, A. (1999). Ethnobotany of Caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Economic Botany, 53, 387–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, V. A., & Albuquerque, U. P. (2004). Técnicas para análise de dados ethnobotânicos.

  • Sop, T. K., Oldeland, J., Bognounou, F., Schmiedel, U., & Thiombiano, A. (2012). Ethnobotanical knowledge and valuation of woody plants species: A comparative analysis of three ethnic groups from the sub-Sahel of Burkina Faso. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 627–649. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9345-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taïta, P. (2003). Use of woody plants by locals in Mare aux Hippopotames Biosphere Reserve in Western Burkina Faso. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1205–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teklehaimanot, Z. (2004). Exploiting the potential of indigenous agroforestry trees: Parkia biglobosa and Vitellaria paradoxa in sub-Saharan Africa. Agroforestry Systems, 61–62, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theilade, I., Hansen, H. H., Krog, M., & Ruffo, C. K. (2007). Estimating use-values and relative importance of trees to the Kaguru people in semi-arid Tanzania: Part II woodland species. Forest, Trees and Livelihoods, 17, 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tougiani, A., Guero, C., & Rinaudo, T. (2009). Community mobilization for improved livelihoods through tree crop management in Niger. GeoJournal, 74, 377–389. doi:10.1007/s10708-008-9228-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A. (2004). Local knowledge of vegetation changes in Sahelian Africa—Implications for local resource management. In Proceeding of the 16th Danish Sahel workshop, January 5–6, 2004. Aarhus, Denmark. SEREIN occasional paper (Vol. 17, pp. 37–52).

  • Wezel, A., & Haigis, J. (2000). Farmers’ perception of vegetation changes in semiarid Niger. Land Degradation and Development, 11, 523–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., & Lykke, A. M. (2006). Woody vegetation change in Sahelian West Africa: Evidence from local knowledge. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 8, 553–567. doi:10.1007/s10668-006-9055-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiersema, A. (2003). Sharing common ground: A cautionary tale on the rights of indigenous peoples and the protection of biological diversity. In R. Picolotti & J. D. Taillant (Eds.), Linking human rights and the environment. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.

  • Zizka, A., Thiombiano, A., Dressler, S., Nacoulma, B. M. I., Ouédraogo, A., Ouédraogo, I., et al. (2015). Traditional plant use in Burkina Faso (West Africa): A national-scale analysis with focus on traditional medicine. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 11, 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest Sciences, Viikki Tropical Resources Institute, University of Helsinki, Latokartanonkaari 7, P.O. Box 27, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Daniel Etongo & Markku Kanninen

  2. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) – West Africa Regional Office (WARO), 06 P.O. Box 9478, Ouagadougou 06, Burkina Faso

    Ida Nadia S. Djenontin

  3. Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, 00014, Helsinki, Finland

    Edinam K. Glover

Authors
  1. Daniel Etongo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ida Nadia S. Djenontin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markku Kanninen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edinam K. Glover
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Etongo.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.

Table 3 List of species identified on fields, fallows, and forests in the study villages
Full size table
Table 4 Thirty most common plant species and their conservation status based on IUCN classification
Full size table
Table 5 Use-value results of the 30 selected plant species
Full size table
Table 6 Differences in local knowledge (use-value) of all species among gender, ethnicity, age groups, and “study villages”
Full size table
Table 7 Multiple comparison Scheffe tests for variable “UV” among, ethnicity, study villages, and age groups
Full size table
Table 8 Multiple comparison Games and Howell test for variable “UV” among age groups and gender
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etongo, D., Djenontin, I.N.S., Kanninen, M. et al. Assessing use-values and relative importance of trees for livelihood values and their potentials for environmental protection in Southern Burkina Faso. Environ Dev Sustain 19, 1141–1166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9787-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9787-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation